The Washington State Department of Ecology
L o a d i n g
The Washington State Department of Ecology is the state of Washington's environmental regulatory agency. Created in February 1970, it was the first environmental regulation agency in the U.S. predating the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency by several months.
Available DatasetsShowing 1179 of 1179 results
- An overview into Washington State’s Environmental Information Management System - EIM12 years ago
- Lakes Environmental Data is a web based map application developed for both Ecology staff and external users to obtain information about lakes in Washington State. It incorporates many lake focused environmental datasets into one searchable tool. Washington State lake data includes: aquatic plants, toxic algae, herbicide use, grants and loans, and fish management.12 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) buildings. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description - Area Maintenance FacilityPrimary maintenance facility centrally located to serve a designated Area within a Region. Typically includes auto mechanic shop, fuel service, and storage for vehicles and consumable inventory (e.g., gravel, sand, salt, paint).83 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) buildings. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description - Headquarters/Region Headquarters FacilityStatewide or regionwide headquarters facility. Regionwide HQ typically includes auto, welding, carpentry, fabrication shops and supporting ancillary storage buildings as well as office space for project engineering and administrative functions.83 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) sites. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description - Headquarters/Region Headquarters FacilityStatewide or regionwide headquarters facility. Regionwide HQ typically includes auto, welding, carpentry, fabrication shops and supporting ancillary storage buildings as well as office space for project engineering and administrative functions.83 years ago
- 3 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.This evolutionarily significant unit, or ESU, includes all naturally spawned populations of Chinook salmon from rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound, including the Strait of Juan De Fuca from the Elwha River, eastward, including rivers and streams flowing into Hood Canal, South Sound, North Sound and the Strait of Georgia in Washington, and 26 artificial propagation programs.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.This evolutionarily significant unit, or ESU, includes all naturally spawned populations of Chinook salmon from rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound, including the Strait of Juan De Fuca from the Elwha River, eastward, including rivers and streams flowing into Hood Canal, South Sound, North Sound and the Strait of Georgia in Washington, and 26 artificial propagation programs.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.This evolutionarily significant unit, or ESU, includes all naturally spawned populations of Chinook salmon from rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound, including the Strait of Juan De Fuca from the Elwha River, eastward, including rivers and streams flowing into Hood Canal, South Sound, North Sound and the Strait of Georgia in Washington, and 26 artificial propagation programs.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.This evolutionarily significant unit, or ESU, includes all naturally spawned populations of Chinook salmon from rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound, including the Strait of Juan De Fuca from the Elwha River, eastward, including rivers and streams flowing into Hood Canal, South Sound, North Sound and the Strait of Georgia in Washington, and 26 artificial propagation programs.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, two species of chum salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover chum by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, two species of chum salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover chum by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, four species of coho salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover coho by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, two species of sockeye salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover sockeye by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, two species of sockeye salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover sockeye by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, two species of sockeye salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover sockeye by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, two species of sockeye salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover sockeye by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, 11 species of steelhead are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover steelhead by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, 11 species of steelhead are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover steelhead by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, 11 species of steelhead are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover steelhead by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, 11 species of steelhead are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover steelhead by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- Use this web map to link to other geospatial datasets available through county and city sites (Not comprehensive). May need to zoom in to see the participating cities. The county boundaries and city points were published by Washington State agencies and downloaded from geo.wa.gov. Locations are approximate, and no warranties are made regarding this data. The canvas basemap has been compiled by Esri and the ArcGIS user community from a variety of best available sources. Want to have your data site listed? Contact the Geospatial Program Office.13 years ago
- High Resolution Change Detection (HRCD) data shows changes in land cover over time – specifically new development and/or tree loss in an area. We use high resolution imagery (1-meter) from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to extract information about changes in land cover for areas across Washington. This includes polygons which show the locations of change and attribute tables with details about causes (Change Agents) and types of changes observed (e.g. canopy loss, impervious surface gain). 23 years ago
- For large areas, like Washington State, download as a file geodatabase. Large data sets like this one, for the State of Washington, may exceed the limits for downloading as shape files, excel files, or KML files. For areas less than a county, you may use the map to zoom to your area and download as shape file, excel or KML, if that format is desired.Information for SOILS data layer was derived from the Private Forest Land Grading system (PFLG) and subsequent soil surveys. PFLG was a five-year mapping program completed in 1980 for the purpose of forestland taxation. It was funded by the Washington State Department of Revenue. The Department of Natural Resources, Soil Conservation Service (now known as the Natural Resources Conservation Service or NRCS), USDA Forest Service and Washington State University conducted soil mapping cooperatively following national soil survey standards. Private lands having the potential of supporting commercial forests were surveyed along with interspersed small areas of State lands, Indian tribal lands, and federal lands. Because this was a cooperative soil survey project, agricultural and non-commercial forestlands were included within some survey areas. After the Department of Natural Resources originally developed its geographic information system, digitized soil map unit delineations and a few soil attributes were transferred to the system. Remaining PFLG soil attributes were later added and are now available through associated lookup tables. SCS (NRCS) soils data on agricultural lands also have been subsequently added to this data layer. The SOILS data layer includes approximately 1,100 townships with wholly or partially digitized soils data. State and private lands which have the potential of supporting commercial forest stands were surveyed. Some Indian tribal and federal lands were surveyed. Because this was a cooperative soils survey project, agricultural and non-commercial forestlands were also included within some survey areas. After the Department of Natural Resources originally developed its geographic information system, digitized soils delineations and a few soil attributes were transferred to the system. Remaining PFLG soil attributes were added at a later time and are now available through associated lookup tables. SCS soils data on agricultural lands also have subsequently been added to this data layer. This layer includes approximately 1, 100 townships with wholly or partially digitized soils data (2,101 townships would provide complete coverage of the state of Washington).- The soils_sv resolves one to many relationships and as such is one of those special "DNR" spatial views ( ie. is implemented similar to a feature class). Column names may not match between SOILS_SV and the originating datasets. Use limitations This Spatial View is available to Washingotn DNR users and those with access to the Washington State Uplands IMS site. The following cautions only apply to one-to-many and many-to-many spatial views! Use these in the metadata only if the SV is one-to-many or many-to-many. CAUTIONS: Area and Length Calculations: Use care when summarizing or totaling area or length calculations from spatial views with one-to-many or many-to-many relationships. One-to-many or many-to-many relationships between tabular and spatial data create multiple features in the same geometry. In other words, if there are two or more records in the table that correspond to the same feature (a single polygon, line or point), the spatial view will contain an identical copy of that feature's geometry for every corresponding record in the table. Area and length calculations should be performed carefully, to ensure they are not being exaggerated by including copies of the same feature's geometry. Symbolizing Spatial Features: Use care when symbolizing data in one-to-many or many-to-many spatial views. If there are multiple attributes tied to the same feature, symbolizing with a solid fill may mask other important features within the spatial view. This can be most commonly seen when symbolizing features based on a field with multiple table records. Labeling Spatial Features: Spatial views with one-to-many or many-to-many relationships may present duplicate labels for those features with multiple table records. This is because there are multiple features in the same geometry, and each one receives a label.Soils Metadata113 years ago
- DSHS Regions defines three geographic areas within the State of Washington, USA for the purposes of administering services to customers and coordinating with partners and stakeholders. Attribute fields include the Region number, a Hub field naming the primary and secondary population centers within the region, and a Counties field naming the counties within the region. These boundaries were derived by DSHS staff based on the US Census Bureau's Census 2010 Washington County boundaries.Lifecycle status: ProductionPurpose: enable open access to DSHS dataDSHS Data Security: Category 1 - PublicLast Update: 2/7/2011Update Cycle: as neededData Sources: DSHSFGDC Metadata: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/DSHS_Region.xmlAre you a DSHS employee? Get more - sign up for your GIS Pass!Important: DSHS reserves the right to alter, suspend, re-host, or retire this service at any time and without notice. This is a map service that you can use in custom web applications and software products. Your use of this map service in these types of tools forms a dependency on the service definition (available fields, layers, etc.). If you form any dependency on this service, be aware of this significant risk to your purposes. You might consider mitigating your risk by extracting the source data and using it to host your own service in an environment under your control. Typically, DSHS Enterprise GIS staff will provide notification of changes via the "Comments" RSS capability in ArcGIS Online. You may subscribe to the RSS feed that publishes comments to monitor any planned and notified changes.63 years ago
- The Wildland Urban InterfaceThis layer represents the Washington Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) as mapped in 2019 by WA State Dept. of Natural Resources - Wildfire and Forest Health & Resiliency divisions under consultation from the USFS Rocky Mtn Research Station. The Dept. was prompted by ESSB 6109 to map the WUI in WA State for the purpose of county-based building code adoptions. The WUI depicts areas of WA where structures and wildland meet or intermingle. Specific structure densities and wildland cover are necessary to meet the definitions for WA State's WUI. For more information about the WUI, please contact: ashley.blazina@dnr.wa.gov23 years ago
- Ecology created SMA_Jurisdiction_Streams (also known as SMA_Arcs_Adopt) by selecting appropriate flowlines from the National Hydrographic Dataset "NHDFlowline.lyr" as maintained by the Department of Ecology in conjunction with the USGS. This dataset can be used with linear referencing and is synchronized with the March 2019 version of NHD.The original official list of streams that meet the 20 cubic feet per second (cfs) mean annual flow criteria found in state rule at WAC 173-18 HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED by lists contained in Ecology-approved shoreline master programs.Each local government master program shall include a list of streams constituting shorelines of the state within the jurisdiction of the master program that complies with the requirements of RCW 90.58.030 (2)(d). When such master program is approved by the department, subsequent to the effective date of this provision, the list within the master program shall be the official list for that jurisdiction and shall supersede the list contained herein. Streams and rivers westof the Cascades crest with a mean annual flow of 1,000 cfs or greater, and eastof the Cascades crest with either a mean annual flow or 200 cfs or more orthe portion downstream from the first 300 square miles of drainage areas are classified as shorelines of statewide significance.63 years ago
- The Channel Migration Potential (CHAMP) layer contains stream networks of Western Washington (and much of Western Oregon) with associated data and information important for assessing channel migration activity. It also features information on channel characteristics such as stream flow and physical dimensions. This data layer’s main feature is a classification of channel migration potential based on channel confinement and erosion potential. The layer was derived from existing statewide geospatial datasets and classified according to channel migration measurements by the High Resolution Change Detection (HRCD) project for the Puget Sound Region (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2014). While the layer identifies the potential for channel migration, it does not predict channel migration rates. Thus, this data layer should be used to screen and prioritize stream reaches for further channel migration evaluation. The tool helps plan and prioritize floodplain management actions such as Channel Migration Zone mapping, erosion risk reduction, and floodplain restoration. The background, use, and development of the CHAMP layer are fully described in Ecology Publication 15-06-003 (full report citation and URL below). That report also describes visual assessment techniques that should be used along with the CHAMP layer to assess channel migration potential. Legg, N.T. and Olson, P.L., 2015, Screening Tools for Identifying Migrating Stream Channels in Western Washington: Geospatial Data Layers and Visual Assessments: Washington State Department of Ecology Publication 15-06-003, 40 p. https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/SummaryPages/1506003.htmlThe tool developers would like to thank the following people for their contribution to this work: • Brian D. Collins (University of Washington) • Jerry Franklin (Washington Department of Ecology) • Christina Kellum (Washington Department of Ecology) • Matt Muller (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife) • Hugh Shipman (Washington Department of Ecology) • Terry Swanson (Washington Department of Ecology) This project has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under Puget Sound Ecosystem Restoration and Protection Cooperative Agreement Grant PC-00J27601 with Washington Department of Ecology. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.Generally, this data layer should be used to screen and prioritize stream reaches for further channel migration evaluation. The data resolution does not allow one to predict channel migration. The classification identifies stream segments for further examination, and those that likely require limited attention or analysis. The potential uncertainty involved in the classification approach is a reason for the visual assessment techniques (described below in Ecology Publication 15-06-003) being described along with the CHAMP data layer.23 years ago
- Streams and rivers published in Chapter 173-18-WAC. This layer will not be updated. It is slowly becoming outdated as cities and counties update their list of Shoreline Management Act streams in their shoreline master program. See WAC 173-18-044 posted at http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=173-18-044.The upstream points where SMA jurisdiction begins were originally compiled for Ecology in 1972 by the US Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Tacoma, WA, and released in STREAMS OF WASHINGTON UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971. Points were determined using multiple-regression techniques based on streamflow and basin precipitation records. Ecology has occasionally updated those points and added and subtracted SMA streams and portions of SMA streams since 1972.23 years ago
- The Functional Classification Map Application allows users to view the Federal Functional Classifications for Washington State as defined and approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The map is updated periodically. Changes in the functional classification system may be officially approved and not yet reflected on this site.Please refer to the Functional Classification Change Request Status (pdf 44kb) document to determine whether approved requests have been included in this map.What is Functional Classification?FHWA Directive 23 CFR 470 states that the State transportation agency has the primary responsibility for developing and updating a statewide highway functional classification in rural and urban areas to determine functional usage of the existing roads and streets. The State transportation agency is to cooperate with responsible local officials, or appropriate Federal agency in the case of areas under Federal jurisdiction, in developing and updating the functional classification. The results of the functional classification is to be mapped and submitted to FHWA for approval and when approved serve as the official record for Federal-aid highways and the basis for designation of the National Highway System.Functional classification is the grouping of highways, roads and streets by the character of service they provide and was developed for transportation planning purposes. Basic to this process is the recognition that individual routes do not serve travel independently in any major way. Rather, most travel involves movement through a network of roads. Comprehensive transportation planning, an integral part of total economic and social development, uses functional classification to determine how travel can be channelized within the network in a logical and efficient manner. Functional classification defines the part that any particular route should play in serving the flow of trips through a highway network.The Washington State Legislature in RCW 47.05.021 and the Federal-Aid Highway Act direct the WSDOT to analyze the entire state highway system to "subdivide", classify, and sub-classify all designated state highways according to their function and importance. For more information on federal guidelines please visit the FHWA website, Functional Classification Guidelines (Concepts, Criteria, and Procedures).23 years ago
- Municipal Stormwater Permit jurisdiction areas for Phase I and Phase II permits, issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology. The Phase I permit regulates discharges from municipal separate storm sewers owned or operated by Clark, King, Pierce and Snohomish Counties, and the cities of Seattle and Tacoma. The Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit rule extends the coverage of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program to certain "small" municipal separate stormwater sewer systems (MS4s). These permit areas incorporate 2019 updates to incorporated City boundaries and unincorporated Urban Growth Areas (UGA) as defined by the Growth Management Act, as well as 2010 Census extents for urbanized areas adjacent to permitted cities and UGAs. This dataset was last updated in 2019. The current permit is effective Aug. 1, 2019, and expires on July 31, 2024.63 years ago
- The Shoreline Public Access Project is a geographic information systems (GIS) project to identify the location, length, and degree of public access to Washington State's marine shoreline. Before the project, it was unknown how much of Washington's 3066 miles of shoreline was public. The information was scattered throughout various government agencies and the data quality was variable. Through the Shoreline Public Access Project, the best available information has been summarized into a single data set, used to answer questions about our shoreline's ownership and public accessibility.For more information, contact Christina Kellum, Washington State Department of Ecology GIS Manager, gis@ecy.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This dataset contains spatial and attribute information of the Surface Water Quality Standards for the State of Washington, Chapter 173-201A WAC. Four views of the WQ Standard are contained in this dataset, Freshwater Beneficial Uses, Seasonal Supplemental Spawning and Egg Incubation Temperature Standards, rules designated in Table 602, and exceptions to Table 602 listed in the footnotes. If any discrepancies are found between GIS layers and the published rule, the published rule takes precedence. Updated April 2018.63 years ago
- Ambient monitoring measures the status of air quality throughout the state to assess trends, compliance with federal and state air quality standards, effectiveness of control strategies and attainment plans, health effects and environmental damage; respond to citizen complaints; evaluate specific geographic or hot-spot air quality concerns; and create environmental indicators. Emission inventory is the cataloging of sources of air pollution and the emissions from those sources. Inventory data are critical to the understanding of the causes of air pollution problems and creation of appropriate solutions. Meteorological forecasting and dispersion modeling of air pollutants are essential to understanding the movement and buildup of air pollution; the carrying capacity of airsheds; the interaction of pollutants; and the location of maximum impact of sources of pollution. As of September 26, 2005 there are no longer any areas of Washington designated as "NONATTAINMENT."63 years ago
- Drought Areas data description: This data layer is derived from copying the designated WRIAs. WRIAs data description: Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA) for Washington State at 1:24,000 scale. WRIAs were formalized under WAC 173-500-040 and authorized under the Water Resources Act of 1971, RCW 90.54. Ecology was given the responsibility for the development and management of these administrative and planning boundaries. These boundaries represent the administrative under pinning of this agency's business activities. The original WRIA boundary agreements and judgments were reached jointly by Washington's natural resource agencies (Ecology, Natural Resources, Fish and Wildlife) in 1970.63 years ago
- These polygon features represent Water Quality Improvement (WQI) projects managed by the Washington State Department of Ecology. WQI projects can be TMDLs, Straight To Implementation (STI) plans, 4b projects and TMDL Alternatives. The boundaries show where the WQI project applies and is being implemented. TMDL Boundaries identified as "In Development" are considered draft and are subject to change when the project has been approved by the U.S. EPA. U.S. EPA only approves TMDLs and 4b projects. Boundaries are representations of each particular project and does not replace the official version of the approved TMDL report. Please see the TMDL Project webpage for specific information about that project. TMDL projects are required by the Federal Clean Water Act to identify pollution sources and pollution load reductions needed for water bodies to meet water quality standards. Once a TMDL project has been approved by the U.S. EPA, it enters an implementation phase where both point source and non-point source pollution is reduced through permit limits regulated under the NPDES system and through best management practices for land uses that contribute to non-point source pollution. Ecology’s water quality program works with permittees, local governments, watershed stakeholders, and residents to reduce sources of pollution to protect our aquatic resources and public health.63 years ago
- This map displays the most recent summary streamflow values within the state of Washington from gages maintained by the Washington State Department of Ecology and the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The streamflow symbols reflect the magnitude of the most recent estimated flows relative to historic flows that occurred in past years on the current date at that particular stream gaging station. Generally, streamflows greater than the 75th percentile are considered above normal. Flows between the 25th and 75th percentiles are considered normal, and flow less than the 25th percentile are considered low.Differences exist in Ecology’s and USGS’ presentation of their respective flow information. The flow data displayed for the Ecology gaging stations are calculated overnight from statistics measured from the previous day’s flow so that all streamflow data displayed for the Ecology gaging stations are relative to the previous day’s flow.USGS reports flow in near real-time meaning the reported flow estimates are updated several times a day and are no more than 6 hours old. The flow data displayed for the USGS gaging stations reflects the near real-time flows relative to the historic record of flows on the current date.For more information on the Department of Ecology River and Stream Flow Monitoring program, visit http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/eap/flow/index.html.For more information on the USGS Water Watch program, visit http://waterwatch.usgs.gov/.Questions or concerns about the map and data displayed should be directed to gis@ecy.wa.gov.All data displayed are provisional and subject to significant change.13 years ago
- Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA) for Washington State at 1:24,000 scale. WRIAs were formalized under WAC 173-500-040 and authorized under the Water Resources Act of 1971, RCW 90.54. Ecology was given the responsibility for the development and management of these administrative and planning boundaries. These boundaries represent the administrative under pinning of this agency's business activities. The original WRIA boundary agreements and judgments were reached jointly by Washington's natural resource agencies (Ecology, Natural Resources, Fish and Wildlife) in 1970.63 years ago
- Applicants for grant funding through Ecology's Water Quality Financial Assistance programs should use the information in this map as the default minimum riparian buffer that will be funded for best management practice (BMP) implementation in a TMDL or other water quality improvement project. The buffer width information presented in this map is based on the 2013 Distribution of Anadromous and ESA listed fish species, and the most recent published flowlines from the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). Anadromous and ESA listed fish distribution data was compiled by the Northwest Indian Fish Commission (NWIFC) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and combined with the NHD flowlines so that minimum buffer widths could be associated with the different NHD FCodes and fish presence as outlined in Table L-1 of the 2015 Funding Guidelines (Ecology publication no. 13-10-041).Stream flowlines will only draw on the map at certain scales; if you don't see the blue and green stream lines (drawn over the basemap), then zoom in a little farther so they show up. 13 years ago
- This layer displays the toxicity-weighted concentrations of chemical releases to air from facility emissions and off-site incineration averaged over a three-year period (2012-2014). Communities living near areas of routine chemical releases may bear a disproportionate burden to the pollution being released into the environment. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=473263 years ago
- This layer represents the percent householders spend on housing costs. It uses ACS table DP04 Housing Characteristics. There are three categories under " Selected Monthly Costs as as percentage of household income" for households with mortgages, without mortgages and rentals. Percentages are presented for households spending great than 30 percent of their income on housing costs. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=474263 years ago
- The National Highway Freight Network (NHFN) consists of four components: 1. Primary Highway Freight System (PHFS): This is a network of highways identified as the most critical highway portions of the U.S. freight transportation system determined by measurable and objective national data.2. Other Interstate portions not on the PHFS: These highways consist of the remaining portion of Interstate roads not included in the PHFS. These routes provide important continuity and access to freight transportation facilities.3.Critical Rural Freight Corridors (CRFCs): These are public roads not in an urbanized area which provide access and connection to the PHFS and the Interstate with other important ports, public transportation facilities, or other intermodal freight facilities.4. Critical Urban Freight Corridors (CUFCs): These are public roads in urbanized areas which provide access and connection to the PHFS and the Interstate with other ports, public transportation facilities, or other intermodal transportation facilities.States and in certain cases, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), are responsible for designating public roads for the CRFCs and CUFCs in accordance with section 1116 of the FAST Act. This GIS dataset includes the last two components of NHFN network, Critical Urban Freight Corridors and Critical Rural Freight Corridors. Another GIS dataset is also available and published for the NHFN PHFS and Non-PHFS Interstates. The data source is FHWA and original GIS shapefiles were acquired through FHWA’s National Highway Freight Network Tool in December 2019: https://usdot.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=c4c0fdef029a4093b169e493e188398883 years ago
- The Washington State Freight and Goods Transportation System (FGTS) classifies freight corridors by modes in Washington state based on annual freight tonnage moved, including truck, rail, and waterway freight corridors. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) designates and updates the FGTS every two years. This dataset depicts the waterway freight corridors classified under FGTS system, and provides information on waterway name, link name, annual freight tonnage moved, and corridor classifications in tiers based on 2019 data.The data source for creating waterway freight corridors is the US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources: https://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/About/Technical-Centers/WCSC-Waterborne-Commerce-Statistics-Center/Data from Waterborne Commerce of the United States 2019, Part 4 report was used to extract cargo tonnage data by waterways in Washington state, and the GIS data of the National Waterway Network was used for mapping purpose. This GIS data is published for 2021 FGTS update. Two other GIS datasets are also available and published for 2021 FGTS update, including FGTS Truck Corridors, and FGTS Waterway Corridors. For more information about FGTS system, please visit https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/freight/fgts83 years ago
- This layer contains information on where there are permanent access restrictions to bicycles on Washington state routes. This does not include temporary restrictions which are sometimes associated with projects around the state. Please refer to WSDOT Projects webpagehttps://www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/ and Projects Interactive Maphttps//www.transinfo.state.wa.us/projects/gis/mapping/interactivemap.asp to determine if restrictions are in place. WSDOT contact staff, identified on project pages, can provide more information regarding possible access restrictions for a given project. Please note that the I-90 Snoqualmie Pass East project is associated with long-term travel restrictions. The 2019 travel restrictions for that project are detailed on the I-90 Corridor - North Bend to Vantage Bike Detour maphttps://www.wsdot.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2019/08/02/I90BikeDetour-Map-NorthBend to Vantage.pdf (pdf 814 kb) and additional information can be found on the project websitehttps://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/I90/SnoqualmiePassEast/Default.htm.83 years ago
- Points in the general location of recreational activity opportunities within state parks.Attribute Definitions: PARK_ID - Name of the State Park or State Parks property the point is in.NAME - Category of recreation represented by the point.Notes - Further specification of what the point represents, or miscellaneous notes about the activity.Long - Longitude of the point.Lat - Latitude of the point. To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- For large areas, like Washington State, download as a file geodatabase. Large data sets like this one, for the State of Washington, may exceed the limits for downloading as shape files, excel files, or KML files. For areas less than a county, you may use the map to zoom to your area and download as shape file, excel or KML, if that format is desired.DNR Water Bodies (WB) and DNR Watercourses (WC) collectively known as DNR Hydro, contain water feature location and water type that is used by the Forest Practices program to determine the amount and pattern of riparian buffer protection required during forest practices activities. The water type is a Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) classification system of streams and water bodies that identifies whether or not streams/water bodies have potential fish habitat, and whether or not streams experience perennial or seasonal flow. WC Hydro represents water courses as arcs or lines. These occur alone as single arcs representing streams, ditches, or pipelines, or as centerlines through water body polygons such as double-banked streams, lakes, impoundments, reservoirs, wet areas, or glaciers. WB represents water bodies as polygonal features. WB Hydro includes features such as Puget Sound, lakes, wet areas, reservoirs, impoundments, glaciers, islands, and dams. WS represents shorelines as polygon perimeter arcs and are edited coincidentally with WB. WC and WB are edited daily and simultaneously; updates are posted weekly for internal DNR use and monthly for external use. Routes can be built on the WC by using the whole stream identifier (WC_LLID_NR). DNR HYDRO is continually updated through the DNR Forest Practices Water Type Modification Form process. DNR HYDRO is mixed scale. The nominal scale is considered 1:24,000, but some data at larger scales are included.Watercourses Layer Metadata93 years ago
- * Data last updated July 21, 2020. * Walkways are sidewalks and other forms of pedestrian access that are not recreational trails, but rather provide non-vehicular access to park facilities. Development of this dataset is ongoing. To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- The Point layer covers the State of Washington with a variety of different types of locations. The great majority of Points, point type 1, Corner Point, are located at the corners, or angle points, of Legal Description and Parcel areas. (See the metadata for Legal Description and Parcel.) Corner Points can represent differing types of locations such as surveyed monuments, locations calculated by survey, locations digitized from various maps like US Geological Survey quadrangles, and locations that serve no other purpose than to stabilize the endpoint of a Boundary or angle point of a Legal Description or Parcel. Points are the only features in the upland Cadastre that have attributes regarding the source and accuracy of the data. The known accuracy of the data varies dramatically from place to place. The attributes also indicate whether there is a known physical object to look for on the ground. The second type of Point, Geodetic Control Point, point type 2, is not currently populated. The third type of Point, Significant Coordinated Location, point type 3, can be used to store any type of point location that has cadastral significance. At present, the only Significant Coordinated Points in Cadastre are those points along the Washington Pacific Ocean coast which were used by the US Minerals Management Service to calculate the boundary of the State at one marine league from the coast.WA Public Land Survey Points MetadataClick to download93 years ago
- PLS Township. In the Public Land Survey System a Township refers to a unit of land, that is nominally six miles on a side, usually containing 36 sections, some of which are designed to correct for the convergence of meridians or range lines, with boundaries conforming to meridians and parallels within established limits.WA Public Land Survey Townships MetadataClick for downloadService URL: https://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/arcgisext/weba_ext_prod4/rest/services/Cadastre/WADNR_Cadastre_OpenData/MapServer/893 years ago
- This layer depicts areas within WA State Parks where metal detection activity is allowed. Features were compiled from various previous metal detection area layers. Features were reviewed to ensure they match the metal detection areas as depicted on the metal detection area maps posted on the WA State Parks website at https://parks.state.wa.us/127/Metal-detecting as of January 13, 2018. Local park management considerations may impact areas currently available for metal detection activity. For further information, including registration forms, see https://parks.state.wa.us/127/Metal-detecting. Reviewed March 2022.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to https://geo.wa.gov/datasets?q=wsprcand search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- This measure represents exposure to diesel emissions (NOx). This data is from the Washington State Department of Ecology's 2014 Comprehensive Emissions Inventory. The basis of the diesel NOx data is Washington State's Department of Ecology’s 2014 Comprehensive Emissions Inventory. A detailed description can be found here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=363263 years ago
- Washington State county boundaries from Washington Department of Natural Resources. Acres of distribution calculated from following maps published by the Washington State Department of Agriculture in 2011: Knotweed, Bohemian, “Polygonum bohemicum” Distribution 2011. Giant, “Polygonum sachalinense” Distribution 2011. Himalayan, “Polygonum polystachyum” Distribution 2011. Knotweed, Japanese, “Polygonum cuspidatum” Distribution 2011. PRISM projects extracted from PRISM website Project Search @ https://secure.rco.wa.gov/PRISM/search/ProjectSearch.aspx in 2015.63 years ago
- WSDOT's Corridor Sketch Initiative is a set of planning activities that engages the agency's partners to determine the context and performance of state highway corridors and identify high-level strategies for addressing performance gaps. The initiative complements and supports regional planning processes around the state and serves as the foundation for practical solutions and integrated scoping. WSDOT uses the results of the Corridor Sketch Initiative to determine where the agency should do more in depth planning and analysis. For more information on the Corridor Sketch Initiative, go to https://wsdot.wa.gov/engineering-standards/planning-guidance/planning-study-guidance/corridor-sketch-initiative. WSDOT divided the state's highway system into 304 functional segments that serve communities, economic regions and regional networks. The agency considered traffic characteristics, Freight and Goods Transportation System classification, access management, roadway characteristics, seasonal closures, land use, and proximity to intermodal centers such as ports or transit centers.83 years ago
- This service depicts the Department of Transportation Connecting Washington Legislative investment projects. With Connecting Washington, Governor Inslee and legislators are making substantial investments in enhancing and maintaining our transportation system. The Washington State Department of Transportation’s mission is to provide and support safe, reliable and cost-effective transportation options to improve livable communities and economic vitality for people and businesses. This critical investment in our transportation system enables us to better fulfill this mission and improve our multimodal transportation system for the people we serve. Connecting Washington’s reform efforts support WSDOT’s continuous improvements, including practical solutions to reduce costs, increase efficiencies, improve coordination with our transit partners and maximize our transportation system’s multimodal capacity. We stand ready to deliver our Connecting Washington projects, and to work with our communities and partners to grow the capacity of our multimodal system. Projects are placed linearly along Washington State Highway system, items that do not have an associated State Route such as ferry boat preservation, direct project support and region wide projects are not reflected on the map. If you have any questions about the information on this map, please email Lona Hamilton at Hamillo@wsdot.wa.gov You can find an interative application of this data at http://wsdot.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=02b28f10d90b4ffa87e9f1a0c7df4a4983 years ago
- The BSST was created for the Washington State Transportation RRAP which analyzed state highway and roads and their impacts from a Cascadia 9.0M earthquake. The RRAP report is available here: https://mil.wa.gov/asset/5d8ba2a03a1b7. The state bridge results in GIS format are available here: https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/geodatacatalog/default.htm . Technical and user manuals for the BSST tool are available here: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1581518-washington-state-highway-bridge-seismic-screening-tool-bsst-technical-report In addition to the state bridges that were analyzed above, local bridges were obtained from WSDOT and analyzed in the BSST which is the data that is presented here. The data was provided from WSDOT to CISA Region 10. Much of the data for local (city/county) bridges were taken from the national bridge inventory and additional data that WSDOT had available. The local data used in the BSST is not complete and should be updated at the local level by bridge engineers and GIS specialist and analyzed in the BSST to ensure the latest bridge information is included in the tool. The data provided here is an initial analysis using data from WSDOT but it is recommend that local jurisdictions update their information and re-run the tool to ensure the most accurate data is used. The data provided here only includes bridges in western/central WA and only for a Cascadia 9.0M event. The 4,306 local highway bridges incorporated into this study from the WSDOT bridge inventory database were assessed using the BSST analysis methodology detailed previously in this report. Results consist of three types of outcomes: Bridge Damage Levels and Types, Bridge Repair Types, and Bridge Reopening Times. All output is a part of this feature class. Bridge damage types are projected on the basis of both damage level (None, Moderate, Significant), whether a bridge is a special bridge type, and also the types of damage that the bridge will experience (including both direct seismic and secondary earthquake-induced impacts); The projected repair types and reopening times necessary to bring bridges back to a minimum level of functionality that enables their use for emergency response were computed using the methodology specified in the Bridge Reopening Times section. Refer to the BSST Technical Report. The BSST was developed to assess the potential impacts of a CSZ earthquake to highway bridges in Washington State at a system-level as part of the Washington State Transportation Systems RRAP project. The results provided identify the Damage Levels, Damage Types, Repair Types and Reopening Times associated with 4,306 bridges located in Western and Central Washington that were evaluated for this RRAP project. Understanding that this analysis likely constitutes a “worst-case scenario” with respect to bridge damage, the results nonetheless project that the majority of bridges in Washington State will experience moderate to significant damage resulting from a CSZ earthquake. While the majority of bridges that experience damage could be reopened within one year of the earthquake, a substantial number of those bridges are projected to take more than a year to reopen—in many cases 2 or more years. The results also project that while many bridges may be reopened after either minor repairs/inspections or the construction of a temporary bypass road, a substantial number of more significantly damaged bridges span bodies of water and will require complete replacement prior to reopening. This suggests that significant gains in roadway corridor reopening times could be gained by focusing on retrofits or upgrades to these more vulnerable bridges that span rivers and other bodies of water. This tool is primarily intended to inform regional highway prioritization for emergency response activities; however, the BSST provides a useful evaluation methodology that could be applied to other regional emergency preparedness and infrastructure assessment studies. This could include studies of bridge infrastructure to other potential seismic events within the region, or at varying jurisdictional levels (i.e., county, local). The BSST also uses currently available seismic, seismically-induced secondary hazard and infrastructure information. As new seismic information becomes available, or as secondary-hazards (e.g., landslides, avalanches) become characterized more comprehensively, such information could be integrated into the current BSST methodology. Similarly, as seismic retrofit activities or other infrastructure improvement projects continue throughout Washington State, or as new infrastructure are built, it will be important that the infrastructure data integrated in the BSST also be updated periodically. Doing so will ensure that planners and infrastructure managers maintain the most current and complete understanding of the network-level seismic risks of a CSZ event to bridges in Washington. Please note that all results from the BSST are based on a model and information received from WSDOT. Damages from an earthquake may be different than what is provided here. Liquefaction data was used within the BSST tool. WADNR is the source for liquefaction data and is available here: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/geology/geologic-hazards/geologic-hazard-maps#nehrp-site-class-and-liquefaction-susceptibilityUSGS ShakeMap was also used in the BSST tool for a M9.0 Cascadia earthquake and is available here: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/scenarios/eventpage/gllegacycasc9p0expanded_se/shakemap/pga. Data Assumptions/MethodologyData was provided by WSDOT for all local bridges. Data was transferred into BSST format. Bridges that were not included in the Cascadia 9.0M ShakeMap were removed from the tool. This mainly encompasses bridges in the far eastern side of the state. Removed all bridges that were designated as a pedestrian, trail or dam. Removed all bridges that had null or 0 structure length. Those bridges that had no main span quantity, all were changed to 1, meaning a single span bridge. For the bridges missing the federal functional class a value of 9 was assigned. For the bridges with a null in waterway adequacy these values were changed to N. For those bridges that had a null value for scour code these were change to N. Some points had low accuracy coordinates (lat/longs), so these locations were removed from the database since they could not be found. For those bridges that had a BMS elements ID related to a Pier Wall a W code was added to the Pier Type in the road bridges spreadsheet of the BSST tool. This would ensure these bridges were counted as having a pier wall. This information should be updated and verified by local jurisdictions. Snohomish County used the tool for their local bridges. A few of the bridges output in this tool was updated to reflect their results since better data was provided by the county. The tool uses AASHTO curves from various years. These curves were digitized in GIS from a pdf map. The accuracy of these maps could be up to +/- 10 miles due to digitizing the data at the state level. Most of the offset occurred in eastern WA, so impacts should be minimal.83 years ago
- The 2,717 state highway bridges incorporated into this study from the WSDOT bridge inventory database were assessed using the BSST analysis methodology detailed previously in this report. Results consist of three types of outcomes: Bridge Damage Levels and Types, Bridge Repair Types, and Bridge Reopening Times. All output is a part of this feature class. Bridge damage types are projected on the basis of both damage level (None, Moderate, Significant), whether a bridge is a special bridge type, and also the types of damage that the bridge will experience (including both direct seismic and secondary earthquake-induced impacts); The projected repair types and reopening times necessary to bring bridges back to a minimum level of functionality that enables their use for emergency response were computed using the methodology specified in the Bridge Reopening Times section. Refer to the BSST Technical Report. The BSST was developed to assess the potential impacts of a CSZ earthquake to highway bridges in Washington State at a system-level as part of the Washington State Transportation Systems RRAP project. The results provided identify the Damage Levels, Damage Types, Repair Types and Reopening Times associated with 2,717 bridges located in Western and Central Washington that were evaluated for this RRAP project. Understanding that this analysis likely constitutes a “worst-case scenario” with respect to bridge damage, the results nonetheless project that the majority of bridges in Washington State will experience moderate to significant damage resulting from a CSZ earthquake. While the majority of bridges that experience damage could be reopened within one year of the earthquake, a substantial number of those bridges (28.7 percent) are projected to take more than a year to reopen—in many cases 2 or more years. The results also project that while many bridges may be reopened after either minor repairs/inspections or the construction of a temporary bypass road, a substantial number of more significantly damaged bridges (797 structures) span bodies of water and will require complete replacement prior to reopening. This suggests that significant gains in roadway corridor reopening times could be gained by focusing on retrofits or upgrades to these more vulnerable bridges that span rivers and other bodies of water. This tool is primarily intended to inform regional highway prioritization for emergency response activities; however, the BSST provides a useful evaluation methodology that could be applied to other regional emergency preparedness and infrastructure assessment studies. This could include studies of bridge infrastructure to other potential seismic events within the region, or at varying jurisdictional levels (i.e., county, local). The BSST also uses currently available seismic, seismically-induced secondary hazard and infrastructure information. As new seismic information becomes available, or as secondary-hazards (e.g., landslides, avalanches) become characterized more comprehensively, such information could be integrated into the current BSST methodology. Similarly, as seismic retrofit activities or other infrastructure improvement projects continue throughout Washington State, or as new infrastructure are built, it will be important that the infrastructure data integrated in the BSST also be updated periodically. Doing so will ensure that planners and infrastructure managers maintain the most current and complete understanding of the network-level seismic risks of a CSZ event to Washington State highways.Please note that all results from the BSST are based on a model and information received from WSDOT. Damages from an earthquake may be different that what is provided here. Liquefaction data was used within the BSST tool. WADNR is the source for liquefaction data and is available here: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/geology/geologic-hazards/geologic-hazard-maps#nehrp-site-class-and-liquefaction-susceptibilityUSGS ShakeMap was also used in the BSST tool for a M9.0 Cascadia earthquake and is available here: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/scenarios/eventpage/gllegacycasc9p0expanded_se/shakemap/pga. DHS distributed this data to WSDOT on August 22, 2019.83 years ago
- This dataset contains commute trip data for six biennial survey cycles of Washington State employees in the CTR program. Survey participants record one week of AM commute trip data. The data was aggregated by worksite, weighted by response rate, extrapolated to all employees at worksites, aggregated to Census Tracts, and joined to census tract geographic data, as delineated by the U.S. Census Bureau. Worksites participating in the CTR program have at least 100 full-time employees that report to work between 6-9 am. CTR worksites are located in the following counties: Clark, King, Kitsap, Pierce, Snohomish, Spokane, Thurston, or Yakima. For more information on the CTR program, visit: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/transit/ctr.83 years ago
- The truck freight economic corridor designation is built upon Freight and Goods Transportation System (FGTS) tonnage classification and takes into account freight system resiliency and first/last mile connectivity to freight land uses and facilities. A truck freight economic corridor designation helps understand how freight connectors are being used by industry, and informs future planning efforts to identify the needs and opportunities for improving those connectors. This designation includes three components: 1) High volume truck corridors: T-1 and T-2 freight corridors that are defined in the FGTS as carrying at least four million tons of gross truck tonnage per year; 2) Alternative freight routes: routes that serve as alternatives to primary cross-state freight routes during severe weather or other disruptions to increase freight system resiliency; 3) First/last mile connector routes: truck routes that connect freight-intensive land uses to T-1 and T-2 freight corridors, and alternative freight routes. First/last mile connectors provide important freight linkages to strategic national defense facilities, significant intermodal facilities, warehouse districts, industrial land and distribution centers, and agricultural processing centers, and the National Highway Freight Network. For more information about this designation, please visit https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/freight/fgts83 years ago
- The records in this data were submitted by members of who have salvaged deer or elk meat and have submitted the information required for a WDFW Salvage Permit. See the WDFW Salvage webpage for more information or to create a new permit. The fields displayed in this public view are limited to location and animal details. These details may have been updated by WSDOT staff. Updates will automatically be shown in this layer. This layer does not contain personal information reported by the permittee.Period of this data is from Aug 2020 to present.A rule adopted by the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission in 2016 allows people to legally salvage deer and elk carcasses in the state. The rule specifically applies to deer and elk killed by motor vehicles. Only elk – not deer – may be salvaged in Clark, Cowlitz, and Wahkiakum counties, because federal laws prohibit handling endangered Columbian white-tailed deer in southwest Washington. See WAC 220-400-040 for salvage rule details.The public may view all salvaged deer and elk permits in a webmap (Aug 2020 to Present).63 years ago
- This measure represents exposure to diesel emissions (NOx). This data is from the Washington State Department of Ecology's 2014 Comprehensive Emissions Inventory. The basis of the diesel NOx data is Washington State's Department of Ecology’s 2014 Comprehensive Emissions Inventory. A detailed description can be found here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=363263 years ago
- The Forest Practices Abandoned Roads (ROPA.FPTRANS_ABANDONED_RDS) data layer, an ArcSDE read-only data layer, represents only officially abandoned and orphaned roads existing within the state of Washington. All active roads are now updated and maintained in the DNR's Proprietary Roads (ROPA.ROADS) data layer. The original data layer, TRANS_ROAD_RTE_SV, which originally joined the TRANS spatial data to both the TRANS_ROAD table (road characteristics) using the TRANS_ARC_NO field, and to the TRANS_RTE table using the TRANS_RTE_REF_NO field, has now been split into two data layers. One data layer (ROPA.FPTRANS_ABANDONED_RDS) consists of all abandoned and orphaned roads; the other (ROPA.FPTRANS_OTHER_RTS) consists of trails, railroads, railroad grades, and ferry crossings.Roads abandoned using the official Forest Practices approval process and Roads Orphaned prior to 1975ROPA.FPTRANS_ABANDONED_RDS OBJECTID Internal feature number. Internal feature number. TRANS_ID Unique identifier for each arc. Used as a relate item to relate the Roads Table to the TRANS spatial data. Unique identifier for each arc. Used as a relate item to relate the Roads Table to the TRANS spatial data.data. TRANS_RTE_TY_CD Type of transportation route the linear feature represents. Classification of a transportation route is based on the primary mode of transportation on the route. Type of transportation route the linear feature represents. Classification of a transportation route is based on the primary mode of transportation on the route. Orphaned Road Orphaned RoadType of transportation route the linear feature represents. Classification of a transportation route is based on the primary mode of transportation on the route.TRANS_RTE_TY_LABEL_NM The type of transportation route the linear feature represents written out in English as opposed to a code. Classification of a transportation route is based on the primary mode of transportation on the route. The type of transportation route the linear feature represents written out in English as opposed to a code. Classification of a transportation route is based on the primary mode of transportation on the route.Abandoned Road Roads abandoned using the official Forest Practices approval process Roads abandoned using the official Forest Practices approval processOrphaned Road Roads orphaned using the official Forest Practices approval process Roads orphaned using the official Forest Practices approval processThe type of transportation route the linear feature represents written out in english as opposed to a code. Classification of a transportation route is based on the primary mode of transportation on the route. TRANS_RTE_ID Transportation route identifier in common use. Transportation route identifier in common use.Alphanumeric characters representing an abbreviation of the road name or number, for example, "I-5". (Allow NULL Values, NON-REQUIRED) TRANS_RTE_NM Full textual name of transportation route. Full textual name of transportation route.Alphanumeric characters representing the road name, for example, "NORTH CASCADES HWY". (Allow NULL Values, NON-REQUIRED) ABANDONMENT_ACCEPTANCE_DT Date when the official road abandonment documentation is approved by the DNR Region Forest Practices official. Date when the official road abandonment documentation is approved by the DNR Region Forest Practices official.Date when the official road abandonment documentation is approved by the DNR Region Forest Practices official.(Allow NULL Values, NON-REQUIRED) ABANDONMENT_FPA_NO The Forest Practices Application Number (FPAN) that pertains to the particular road abandonment(s). The Forest Practices Application Number (FPAN) that pertains to the particular road abandonment(s).The Forest Practices Application Number (FPAN) that pertains to the particular road abandonment(s). (Allow NULL Values, NON-REQUIRED) SHAPE_SOURCE_ACCURACY_CD The codes that explain how the data was input into the database. The codes that explain how the data was input into the database.10 Photogrammetrically derived Photogrammetrically derived20 Machine scanned 30 Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate31 Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate32 Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate33 Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate34 Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate35 Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate36 Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate37 Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate Contractor digitized from USGS 7.5' separate38 DNR digitized from DNR Water Type Maps DNR digitized from DNR Water Type Maps39 DNR digitized from National Wetlands Inventory DNR digitized from National Wetlands Inventory40 DNR digitized from National Wetlands Inventory DNR digitized from National Wetlands Inventory99 DNR digitized from National Wetlands Inventory DNR digitized from National Wetlands InventoryThe codes that explain how the data was input into the database. (Allow NULL Values, NON-REQUIRED) SHAPE_SOURCE_ACCURACY_LBL The label names that describe in English the codes that explain how the data was input into the database. The label names that describe in English the codes that explain how the data was input into the database.The label names that describe in english the codes that explain how the data was input into the database. SHAPE System generated field. Coordinates defining the features. SHAPE.LEN System generated field.93 years ago
- This dataset documents the location of historic and old growth trees throughout the Washington State Parks system. The historic trees of Washington State Parks are some of the most valuable and impressive resources within the State of Washington. Historic trees are at least 50 years of age and older, and are associated with some culturally significant historic value, such as plantings near former homesteads or other developed landscapes. The old growth trees found in this dataset are strictly remnant and legacy old-growth trees that exist in WA State Parks campgrounds and developed areas so that parks staff and park planners know they exist and have some knowledge of their condition.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).AttributesObserverName of observer/person entering the data point.DateDate that data point was recorded.ParkName of the park that data point was collected at. This field is assigned a domain called "CodeAndName", which matches park cost code to park name.Tree SpeciesSpecies of the historic/old growth tree.Approximate Age / Year EstablishedThe approximate age of the historic or old growth tree or the year that it was established.Historic PurposeThe original purpose of the tree planting (Commericial, Homestead, Old Growth, Other).Tree ConditionCurrent condition of the tree ( Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Very Poor).SpacingSpacing of tree from other trees.BufferClassification of area that buffers the tree. (Mowed herbaceous, Mowed woody, Non-mowed herbaceous, Non-mowed woody).Interpretive MaterialsDoes historic or hold growth tree have an interpretive exhibit at the park? (Y/N)RecommendationsSpecific recommendations for the historic/old growth tree.CommentsGeneral comments or notes about the tree.Historic / Old GrowthClassifies tree as either historic or old growth.63 years ago
- In 2007, Washington State legislators requested a trails database, but funding to complete that statewide project was not made available at the time. In 2009, the Federal Government outlined the need for trails database schema in their Data Standards Review Committee, stressing the efficiency in management decisions that a streamlined database can provide. “The collection, storage and management of trail related data are important components of everyday business activities in many federal and state land-managing agencies, trail organizations and businesses. From a management perspective, trails data must often mesh closely with other types of infrastructure, resource and facility enterprise data.” In 2014, the Washington State Office of the Chief Information Officer's (OCIO) Geospatial Program Office acquired a Nonhighway and Off-Road Vehicle Activities (NOVA) Program grant through the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) giving the OCIO initial funding to develop a statewide trails database based on Federal Geographic Data Committee standards. Using the same standard for all trails data will allow land managers and recreational users throughout the state to access and use the data regardless of administrative boundary. "Data standards will make it easier for trail information to be accessed and exchanged and used by more than one individual agency or group…Ease in sharing data increases the capability for enhanced and consistent mapping, inventory, monitoring, conditions assessment, maintenance, costing, budgeting, information retrieval, and summary reporting for internal and external needs.” Along with streamlining data and facilitating efficiency in management practices across agencies, the database will provide a source of trails information that is open and free to the public.The 2016 State Legislature provided additional funding from the Nonhighway and Off-road Vehicle Activities Account to the Office of the Chief Information Officer to continue work on the database. Additional details about the project can be found here: http://rco.wa.gov/recreation/WashingtonStateTrailsMap.shtml Please note that this map and its component services have been designed to work together as part of the web application.13 years ago
- This layer represents all lands that are covered by the September 1997 State Lands Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). Lands covered by the HCP (Permit Lands) must adhere to the relevant HCP conservation strategies affording coverage under the Incidental Take Permit. This layer does not identify specific HCP conservation roles (e.g. spotted owl NRF/dispersal). Please refer to other relevant GIS layers for specific conservation objective designations. As described in the HCP, these Permit Lands are defined as: "All DNR-managed forest lands within the range of the northern spotted owl, excluding those lands designated as urban or leased for commercial, industrial, or residential purposes and those lands designated as agricultural." (HCP, I.2) This layer is completely dependent on the following corporate data layers; CADASTRE.PARCEL, ROPA.HCPUNIT, ROPA.LAND_USE_SV, and ROPA.RIU_GIS. Changes in source layers will be incorporated at each update. Identifying newly acquired lands as Permit Lands is outlined in the Standard Practice Memorandum SPM08-06. In addition to baseline (1997) HCP covered lands still under DNR management, this layer displays disposed lands that still retain HCP coverage as well as acquired lands that have been designated as HCP covered.93 years ago
- This dataset shows the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe as defined by WDFW’s Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) program. It shows where WDFW recommends counties and cities require site-specific information be gathered to inform site-scale land use decisions. It is not designed to directly inform parcel-scale land use decisions, rather it is designed to be used as a flagging tool. As such, if this dataset errs, it is more likely to over-identify shrubsteppe and eastside steppe than under-identify. It is “best available science” regarding the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe in Washington.23 years ago
- This data set was developed as an information layer for the Washington State Department of Commerce. It is designed to be used as part of the Puget Sound Mapping Project to provide a generalized and standardized depiction of land uses and growth throughout the Puget Sound region.NOTE: Because this is a large dataset, some geoprocessing operations (i.e. dissolve) may not work on the entire dataset. You will receive a topoengine error. Clipping out an area of interest (i.e. a county) and performing the operation on it instead of on the full dataset is a way to get around this software limitation.63 years ago
- This data set was developed as an information layer for the Washington State Department of Commerce. It is designed to be used as part of the Puget Sound Mapping Project to provide a generalized and standardized depiction of land uses and growth throughout the Puget Sound region.NOTE: Because this is a large dataset, some geoprocessing operations (i.e. dissolve) may not work on the entire dataset. You will receive a topoengine error. Clipping out an area of interest (i.e. a county) and performing the operation on it instead of on the full dataset is a way to get around this software limitation.63 years ago
- For large areas, like Washington State, download as a file geodatabase. Large data sets like this one, for the State of Washington, may exceed the limits for downloading as shape files, excel files, or KML files. For areas less than a county, you may use the map to zoom to your area and download as shape file, excel or KML, if that format is desired.General DescriptionThis layer shows only Active Roads on DNR Lands in black. This does not include abandoned, orphaned, decommisioned, or closed roads on DNR lands. Roads not on DNR Lands are of unknown status are shown in grey. Roads not on DNR lands and of unknown status may not be drivable. IncludesThe ROAD feature class stores the spatial location and attributes of the State of Washington, Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) forest roads and of other DNR, public and selected private roads in the state. Other elements of the transportation network such as ferries, railroads, and trails are not included. ContactWashington State Department of Natural Resources (WA DNR) Engineering DivisionAlexandra WashburnAlexandra.Washburn@dnr.wa.gov Updating EffortsUpdating and editing efforts are primarily focused on roads in DNR managed state lands, adjunct roads or in areas that are covered by a published map that is undergoing an update. The original road lines were entered primarily by digitizing from paper maps, scanning by machine, or derived stereoscopically from black and white photo imagery. They are currently updated and corrected as needed, in most cases using on-line, geo-referenced orthophotography, stereo color imagery, GPS or field survey.Roads on DNR Lands should be edited frequently by division staff.Roads outside of DNR Lands are probably edited much less frequently. The group in mapping that did this, does not do it anymore.AttributesThe ROAD layer includes basic attributes that are linked to the intersection-based road segments. These attributes store information about route id, road name, road number, control, responsibility, status, access, surface, classification, and abandonment.PurposeThis layer is used to help in road infrastructure planning and maintenance, Forest Practices and Road Maintenance and Abandonment Planning (RMAP) compliance reporting, forest management, timber sales planning, and is the basis for the ROAD_ROUTE_FT layer and associated event tables that currently record these maintenance activities and road easements. It is widely used as a layer in cartographic presentations and published maps.93 years ago
- WSDOT traffic count data, including base and summary statistics related to vehicle volume, classification, speed, and weight are now available in our Traffic Count Data System, hosted by MS2. This application replaces the WSDOT Traffic Data Geoportal and provides significantly more information, including base and historical data and statistics. A Help and Users Guide is available on our Traffic Count Data page that will help you with navigating the application.23 years ago
- This layer contains data (in point geometry) on park accommodations for visitors to Washington State Parks (Restroom facilities, kitchen shelters, picnic tables, ranger stations and so forth.) The layer is derived from the agency's facilities inventory dataset.Attribute Definitions:ParkName - Name of the State Park or State Parks property the structure is in.Name – Type of the public accommodation structure.UFI - ID number assigned by WA DES's (Washington Department of Enterprise Services) Facility Inventory Condition Assessment Program (FICAP).Photos - A weblink to photo attachments for the structure.DateConst - Date the facility was constructed.Long - Longitude of the structure.Lat – Latitude of the structure. To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- For large areas, like Washington State, download as a file geodatabase. Large data sets like this one, for the State of Washington, may exceed the limits for downloading as shape files, excel files, or KML files. For areas less than a county, you may use the map to zoom to your area and download as shape file, excel or KML, if that format is desired.DNR Water Bodies (WB) and DNR Watercourses (WC) collectively known as DNR Hydro, contain water feature location and water type that is used by the Forest Practices program to determine the amount and pattern of riparian buffer protection required during forest practices activities. The water type is a Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) classification system of streams and water bodies that identifies whether or not streams/water bodies have potential fish habitat, and whether or not streams experience perennial or seasonal flow. WC Hydro represents water courses as arcs or lines. These occur alone as single arcs representing streams, ditches, or pipelines, or as centerlines through water body polygons such as double-banked streams, lakes, impoundments, reservoirs, wet areas, or glaciers. WB represents water bodies as polygonal features. WB Hydro includes features such as Puget Sound, lakes, wet areas, reservoirs, impoundments, glaciers, islands, and dams. WS represents shorelines as polygon perimeter arcs and are edited coincidentally with WB. WC and WB are edited daily and simultaneously; updates are posted weekly for internal DNR use and monthly for external use. Routes can be built on the WC by using the whole stream identifier (WC_LLID_NR). DNR HYDRO is continually updated through the DNR Forest Practices Water Type Modification Form process. DNR HYDRO is mixed scale. The nominal scale is considered 1:24,000, but some data at larger scales are included.Water Bodies Layer Metadata93 years ago
- Points that hold information relating to the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act)-related recreational features available at Washington State Parks. These points indicate which state parks contain which types of recreational features that are compliant with ADA requirements. For specifics about features, see the park's web page (hyperlink available by clicking on the point). This layer is used in the web application ADA Accessible Features Finder. To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- For large areas, like Washington State, download as a file geodatabase. Large data sets like this one, for the State of Washington, may exceed the limits for downloading as shape files, excel files, or KML files. For areas less than a county, you may use the map to zoom to your area and download as shape file, excel or KML, if that format is desired.The Boundary layer consists of lines representing the boundaries of Parcels and Legal Descriptions. (See the metadata for those two layers.) Boundary lines are the places that are surveyed in order to delimit the extent of Parcels and Legal Descriptions. The character and accuracy of Boundary locations is held in the attributes of the Points that are at the ends of Boundary lines. All the boundaries of Parcels and Legal Descriptions are covered by a Boundary line. Currently the Boundary layer has little functionality. The only distinction it makes is between upland boundaries and shorelines. In the future Boundary lines will have a richer set of attributes in order to accommodate cartographic needs to distinguish between types of boundaries.WA Boundaries Metadata93 years ago
- Click here to downloadClick for metadataService URL: https://gis.dnr.wa.gov/site2/rest/services/Public_Forest_Practices/WADNR_PUBLIC_FP_Rule/MapServer/7This feature class was developed as a cooperative project between the Department of Natural Resources Forest Practices Division, the Department of Ecology, and the Olympic National Forest. The data set was designed as a polygon coverage, delineated on 1:250,000- scale map overlays and digitized in 1991. It was plotted and proofed, but not completed at that time. Beginning in August, 1994 the coverage STRMTEMP was edited, corrected, and proofed. The data set is now a polygon feature class and shows only Class AA, A, and B polygons. It does not address Lake Class completely (some lakes are delineated, some not); see notes below for explanation. Specific conditions of certain stream segments are also not addressed by the feature class. The WAC MUST be referred to whenever this data set is used. The 1991 MPL coverage was used in delineating the extent of AA polygons. Changes through time in Federal land boundaries may affect the classification of waters in those lands. SUMMARY OF TEMPERATURE CLASSIFICATIONS DESIGNATED IN CHAPTER 173-201A WAC WATERQUALITY STANDARDS FOR SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON WAC 173-201A-030 General water use and criteria classes (1) Class AA (extraordinary) Temperature shall not exceed 16.0 degrees C (freshwater) or 13.0 degrees C (marine water) due to human activities. (2) Class A (excellent) Temperature shall not exceed 18.0 degrees C (freshwater) or 16.0 degrees C (marine water) due to human activities. (3) Class B (good) Temperature shall not exceed 21.0 degrees C (freshwater) or 19.0 degrees C (marine water) due to human activities. (4) Class C (fair) Temperature shall not exceed 22.0 degrees C due to human activities. For all of the above classes, when natural conditions exceed the listed temperature, no temperature increases will be allowed which will raise the receiving water temperature by greater than 0.3 degrees C. (5) Lake Class Temperature - no measurable change from natural conditions. *** Notes regarding WAC 173-201A sections 130 and 140 - Specific classifications for fresh and marine waters: All lakes and their feeder streams are classified as Lake Class. In this data set some large lakes and their feeder streams have had polygons created around them. These are shown as Class AA. Many lakes too small to be separately delineated may be contained within Class B, A, or AA polygons. Some stream segments have special conditions applied to their temperature standards. These conditions are listed in the WAC but are not delineated in the polygon coverage. These include the Columbia River, Duwamish River, Grande Ronde River, Hoquiam River, Lake Washington Ship Canal, Mill Creek (near Walla Walla), Palouse River, Pend Oreille River, Puyallup River, Skagit River, Snake River, Spokane River, Walla Walla River, Wishkah River, Yakima River, and Tacoma city waterway in Commencement Bay. These Special temperature designations are for the stream waters in the listed segment only. Temperature standards for all waters feeding that segment are as shown in the polygon coverage. This data set is a polygon coverage, and does not contain information on all surface waters listed in the WAC. All questions pertaining to temperature classification of surface waters in Washington must be clarified by referring to the WAC.93 years ago
- Conditional land uses in Washington State Parks. These uses may be permitted, but conditioned to assure design is compatible with purpose of land classification and abutting land objectives.For more detailed land classification and management plan information for Washingto State Parks, please find the land classification layer here.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).Conditional Use AttributesParkNameName of the Washington State Park.CategoryCategory for the Washington State Park (State Park, State Park Property, Historic State Park, Marine State Park, etc.).Conditional UseSpecific conditional uses that are allowed in an area of a park, as approved by the Commission.DocumentFilepath to the documentation that reviews the conditional uses approved by the Commission.CommentsGeneral comments or additional notes on the conditional use.AcresAcreage of the conditional use area.63 years ago
- WSDOT Aviation Economic Impact Study Map ApplicationWSDOT Aviation has chosen consulting firm Kimley-Horn to develop a new statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study for the Washington Aviation System starting October 2018, with completion tentatively scheduled for February 2020. This interactive map application supports content of the Aviation Economic Impact Study. More information and updates can be found on the project website.Airports provide an essential link to the nation's air space, commerce, and emergency services and are an important part of Washington State's transportation system and economy. Washington has 138 public airports in 37 of its 39 counties. Each airport fulfills a particular role in supporting community economic and transportation needs.The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Aviation Division, with the support of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is conducting an economic impact study to:Measure the economic impacts of each public-use airport in Washington.Assess the economic value that airports create for communities.Show airports and the state aviation system contribute to the state's economy and economic competitiveness.Online Aviation Economic Impact CalculatorFor the full report, please email christina.crea@wsdot.wa.gov23 years ago
- The WSDOT Bridge Vertical Clearance Trip Planner is an application intended to help the public identify bridges with restricted vertical clearances up to 16 feet on State highways. The application also provides links for permits and other information. With this application, you can: Enter your vehicle height up to 16 feet See bridges on or over state routes that will not clear your load See bridges on or over state routes that will clear your load if the maximum clearance lane is chosen Obtain more detailed information about specific bridges and under crossings with clearance restrictions Links to additional resourcesNote that anyone planning a trip with over height loads is still obligated to confirm the route in accordance with WAC 468-38-070 and obtain a WSDOT permit. For more information regarding this app please visit https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Bridge/Structures/BVCTP.htm. Feedback for this application should sent to:clearance@wsdot.wa.gov. If you're having trouble viewing the application, please contact our Online Map Support.Disclaimer: This Bridge Vertical Clearance Trip Planner is a guide for vertical clearances, but because of physical changes to highways and other possible inconsistencies due to natural phenomena (expansion and contraction of highway facilities due to temperature, natural or unnatural material deposition on the pavement, other transient and lasting unforeseen events, etc.), new construction, pavement overlays, lane reconfiguration, etc, it cannot be guaranteed. As stated on all permits in accordance with state law, the operator is responsible to identify, navigate and clear all obstructions. WAC 468-38-070 states, It is the responsibility of the permit applicant to check, or prerun, the proposed route and provide for safe maneuvers around the obstruction or detours as necessary. Note that the lane in which the maximum and minimum clearances occur are not listed. This must be determined by the operator. In accordance with state law, the owner or operator of a vehicle or combination of vehicles shall exercise due care in determining that sufficient vertical clearance is provided upon the public highways where the vehicle or combination of vehicles is being operated. Also note that the clearances displayed are approximately three inches less than the actual measured clearances. This adjustment is intended to enhance safety and increase the margin of error for judgments made by highway users hauling oversize loads. For that reason, and due to the variations in structure clearance partially cataloged above, such users should not assume that clearance is in excess of what is published, and should utilize check and pre-run methods to assure safe passage.23 years ago
- The National Highway Freight Network (NHFN) consists of four components: 1. Primary Highway Freight System (PHFS): This is a network of highways identified as the most critical highway portions of the U.S. freight transportation system determined by measurable and objective national data.2. Other Interstate portions not on the PHFS: These highways consist of the remaining portion of Interstate roads not included in the PHFS. These routes provide important continuity and access to freight transportation facilities.3. Critical Rural Freight Corridors (CRFCs): These are public roads not in an urbanized area which provide access and connection to the PHFS and the Interstate with other important ports, public transportation facilities, or other intermodal freight facilities.4. Critical Urban Freight Corridors (CUFCs): These are public roads in urbanized areas which provide access and connection to the PHFS and the Interstate with other ports, public transportation facilities, or other intermodal transportation facilities.States and in certain cases, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), are responsible for designating public roads for the CRFCs and CUFCs in accordance with section 1116 of the FAST Act. This GIS dataset includes the first two components of NHFN network, PHFS and Non-PHFS Interstates. Another GIS dataset is also available and published for the NHFN Critical Urban and Rural Freight Corridors. The data source is FHWA and original GIS shapefiles were acquired through FHWA’s National Highway Freight Network Tool in December 2019: https://usdot.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=c4c0fdef029a4093b169e493e188398883 years ago
- The Washington State Freight and Goods Transportation System (FGTS) classifies freight corridors by modes in Washington state based on annual freight tonnage moved, including truck, rail, and waterway freight corridors. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) designates and updates the FGTS every two years. This dataset depicts the rail freight corridors classified under FGTS system, and provides information on railroad name, segment location, ownership and operators, and corridor classifications in tiers. This dataset is based on rail inventory and volume information collected for data year 2020 and published in 2021 FGTS update.Two other GIS datasets are also available and published for 2021 FGTS update, including FGTS Truck Corridors, and FGTS Waterway Corridors. For more information about FGTS system, please visit https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/freight/fgts83 years ago
- To download the entire dataset click on https://fortress.wa.gov/dfw/public/PublicDownload/Habitat/HRCD/HRCD.zipThis dataset includes changes in land cover throughout Washington State, specifically areas of tree loss and development. Changes are represented as polygons and include qualitative descriptions and quantitative assessments of changes. Attributes provide details about causes of change (Change Agents), types of changes observed (e.g. canopy loss, impervious surface gain), area of change, and time period for when the change occurred. The change locations were identified from analyzing high resolution (1-meter) NAIP imagery, allowing changes as small as a single tree or new home to be identified. This dataset covers most of Western Washington and several counties in Eastern Washington. Coverage is split along county and/or WRIA boundaries and the time periods for change locations vary by county and/or WRIA. All areas in the dataset were assessed for changes between 2011 and 2017; additionally, some locations include changes as early as 2006 or as recent as 2019. Visit https://hrcd-wdfw.hub.arcgis.com/ or email HRCD@dfw.wa.gov for more information on how the data is created, accuracy information, tutorials, user guides, and current coverage information.This dataset is updated regularly (about twice a year) with more recent years of change, new counties / WRIAs, or both. This copy of the data was updated in July 2022.63 years ago
- This layer displays the toxicity-weighted concentrations of chemical releases to air from facility emissions and off-site incineration averaged over a three-year period (2012-2014). Communities living near areas of routine chemical releases may bear a disproportionate burden to the pollution being released into the environment. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=473263 years ago
- This layer represents data on poverty from the ACS 5-year roll-up. The data available in the ACS measured people living under 185% of the federal poverty level from Table S1701 columns for Population used to estimate poverty (HC01_EST_VC01), the number of people living below 185% (HC01_EST_VC55) and the associated margin of error (HC01_MOE_VC55). A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=362563 years ago
- This dataset documents the location of historic and old growth trees throughout the Washington State Parks system. The historic trees of Washington State Parks are some of the most valuable and impressive resources within the State of Washington. Historic trees are at least 50 years of age and older, and are associated with some culturally significant historic value, such as plantings near former homesteads or other developed landscapes. The old growth trees found in this dataset are strictly remnant and legacy old-growth trees that exist in WA State Parks campgrounds and developed areas so that parks staff and park planners know they exist and have some knowledge of their condition.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).AttributesObserverName of observer/person entering the data point.DateDate that data point was recorded.ParkName of the park that data point was collected at. This field is assigned a domain called "CodeAndName", which matches park cost code to park name.Tree SpeciesSpecies of the historic/old growth tree.Approximate Age / Year EstablishedThe approximate age of the historic or old growth tree or the year that it was established.Historic PurposeThe original purpose of the tree planting (Commericial, Homestead, Old Growth, Other).Tree ConditionCurrent condition of the tree ( Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Very Poor).SpacingSpacing of tree from other trees.BufferClassification of area that buffers the tree. (Mowed herbaceous, Mowed woody, Non-mowed herbaceous, Non-mowed woody).Interpretive MaterialsDoes historic or hold growth tree have an interpretive exhibit at the park? (Y/N)RecommendationsSpecific recommendations for the historic/old growth tree.CommentsGeneral comments or notes about the tree.Historic / Old GrowthClassifies tree as either historic or old growth.63 years ago
- This layer shows the boundaries of the 9 Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) Planning Units (PU): Olympic Experimental State Forest, South Coast, North Puget, Columbia, Straits, South Puget, Chelan, Yakima, and Klickitat. They are grouped in three categories based on the differences in the adopted conservation strategies for northern spotted owl: Olympic Experimental State Forest, five Westside PU (South Coast, North Puget, Columbia, Straits, and South Puget,) and three eastside PU (Chelan, Yakima, and Klickitat). The baseline layer HCPUNIT97 was created in 1997 and is located at /database/covers/baseline/hcupunit97. The current layer displays the change in the boundary between Klickitat and Yakima PU as agreed in the HCP Amendment #1 (April, 2004) and the change between the OESF and Straits PU (March 2005).93 years ago
- In 2007, Washington State legislators requested a trails database, but funding to complete that statewide project was not made available at the time. In 2009, the Federal Government outlined the need for trails database schema in their Data Standards Review Committee, stressing the efficiency in management decisions that a streamlined database can provide. “The collection, storage and management of trail related data are important components of everyday business activities in many federal and state land-managing agencies, trail organizations and businesses. From a management perspective, trails data must often mesh closely with other types of infrastructure, resource and facility enterprise data.” In 2014, the Washington State Office of the Chief Information Officer's (OCIO) Geospatial Program Office acquired a Nonhighway and Off-Road Vehicle Activities (NOVA) Program grant through the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) giving the OCIO initial funding to develop a statewide trails database based on Federal Geographic Data Committee standards. Using the same standard for all trails data will allow land managers and recreational users throughout the state to access and use the data regardless of administrative boundary. "Data standards will make it easier for trail information to be accessed and exchanged and used by more than one individual agency or group…Ease in sharing data increases the capability for enhanced and consistent mapping, inventory, monitoring, conditions assessment, maintenance, costing, budgeting, information retrieval, and summary reporting for internal and external needs.” Along with streamlining data and facilitating efficiency in management practices across agencies, the database will provide a source of trails information that is open and free to the public. The 2016 State Legislature provided additional funding from the Nonhighway and Off-road Vehicle Activities Account to the Office of the Chief Information Officer to continue work on the database. Additional details about the project can be found here: http://rco.wa.gov/recreation/WashingtonStateTrailsMap.shtml Please note that this map and its component services have been designed to work together as part of the web application.23 years ago
- This dataset shows the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe as defined by WDFW’s Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) program. It shows where WDFW recommends counties and cities require site-specific information be gathered to inform site-scale land use decisions. It is not designed to directly inform parcel-scale land use decisions, rather it is designed to be used as a flagging tool. As such, if this dataset errs, it is more likely to over-identify shrubsteppe and eastside steppe than under-identify. It is “best available science” regarding the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe in Washington.<o:p></o:p>23 years ago
- This dataset shows the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe as defined by WDFW’s Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) program. It shows where WDFW recommends counties and cities require site-specific information be gathered to inform site-scale land use decisions. It is not designed to directly inform parcel-scale land use decisions, rather it is designed to be used as a flagging tool. As such, if this dataset errs, it is more likely to over-identify shrubsteppe and eastside steppe than under-identify. It is “best available science” regarding the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe in Washington.23 years ago
- This data set was developed as an information layer for the Washington State Department of Commerce. It is designed to be used as part of the Puget Sound Mapping Project to provide a generalized and standardized depiction of land uses and growth throughout the Puget Sound region.NOTE: Because this is a large dataset, some geoprocessing operations (i.e. dissolve) may not work on the entire dataset. You will receive a topoengine error. Clipping out an area of interest (i.e. a county) and performing the operation on it instead of on the full dataset is a way to get around this software limitation.63 years ago
- This data set was developed as an information layer for the Washington State Department of Commerce. It is designed to be used as part of the Puget Sound Mapping Project to provide a generalized and standardized depiction of land uses and growth throughout the Puget Sound region. This map represents land uses, zoning abbreviations and zoning descriptions. Zoning data was collected in raster format and digitized by State Department of Commerce staff. The generalized depiction of intended future land use is based primarily upon 2012 zoning and 2010 assessor's records.NOTE: Because this is a large dataset, some geoprocessing operations (i.e. dissolve) may not work on the entire dataset. You will receive a topoengine error. Clipping out an area of interest (i.e. a county) and performing the operation on it instead of on the full dataset is a way to get around this software limitation.63 years ago
- This map displays the National Highway System (NHS) in Washington State. The NHS is comprised of State Highways and Local Agency roads. This dataset is used as a general reference layer for geographic information systems at the Washington State Department of Transportation. The National Highway System consists of roadways important to the nation's economy, defense, and mobility. This web map was created for use in the WSDOT NHS website. If you have any questions about this data, please contact Heath Bright, HPMS/Functional Class Supervisor - heath.bright@wsdot.wa.gov - (360) 570-2370. If you're having trouble viewing these services, please contact our Online Map Support.The National Highway System (NHS) includes the following subsystems of roadways (note that a specific highway route may be on more than one subsystem):Interstate: The Eisenhower Interstate System of highways retains its separate identity within the NHS. Other Principal Arterials: These are highways in rural and urban areas which provide access between an arterial and a major port, airport, public transportation facility, or other intermodal transportation facility. Strategic Highway Network(STRAHNET): This is a network of highways which are important to the United States' strategic defense policy and which provide defense access, continuity and emergency capabilities for defense purposes. Major Strategic Highway Network Connectors: These are highways which provide access between major military installations and highways which are part of the Strategic Highway Network. Intermodal Connectors: These highways provide access between major intermodal facilities and the other four subsystems making up the National Highway System. The National Highway System includes the Interstate Highway System as well as other roads important to the nation's economy, defense, and mobility. The NHS was developed by the Department of Transportation (DOT) in cooperation with the states, local officials, and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs). 23 years ago
- The Washington State Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project is a coordinated effort between the Washington State Department of Transportation, Cascade Bicycle Club, local jurisdictions and volunteers to count and document bicycle and pedestrian usage of specific intersections and facilities throughout the state. September is the accepted annual national bicycle and pedestrian count period; the annual WSDOT count period is often conducted later in September or early in October to coincide with the peak periods for walking and bicycling for work and school-related trips in Washington State. The State Counts are conducted on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, during the morning and afternoon peak travel times. Mid-week days have been selected for the State Counts to capture a representative time period for commute trips across the region. The time period for conducting the a.m. count is between 7 and 9 and between 4 and 6 for the p.m. count. The morning and afternoon peak periods were chosen since they typically have the largest volume of travelers, with commuters, school children and people running errands. To reduce the chance that data are skewed by weather and to offer flexibility for volunteers, three dates are provided for volunteers to choose from. Although three dates are provided, data are only collected at each location on one of the three dates. The a.m. and the p.m. count can occur on different days.For more information on the Washington State Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project, click here.For more information about this map, contact Online Map Support at OnlineMapSupport@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This application provides access to summarized crash data for the State of Washington. You can learn more about crash-related data products and services on the WSDOT Crash Data page: https://wsdot.wa.gov/about/transportation-data/crash-data.If you have any questions about the data or application, please contact Mike Bernard, Crash Data and Reporting Supervisor - Mike.Bernard@wsdot.wa.gov - (360) 570-245423 years ago
- This layer represents data on poverty from the ACS 5-year roll-up. The data available in the ACS measured people living under 185% of the federal poverty level from Table S1701 columns for Population used to estimate poverty (HC01_EST_VC01), the number of people living below 185% (HC01_EST_VC55) and the associated margin of error (HC01_MOE_VC55). A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=362563 years ago
- The 2,717 state highway bridges incorporated into this study from the WSDOT bridge inventory database were assessed using the BSST analysis methodology detailed previously in this report. Results consist of three types of outcomes: Bridge Damage Levels and Types, Bridge Repair Types, and Bridge Reopening Times. All output is a part of this feature class. Bridge damage types are projected on the basis of both damage level (None, Moderate, Significant), whether a bridge is a special bridge type, and also the types of damage that the bridge will experience (including both direct seismic and secondary earthquake-induced impacts); The projected repair types and reopening times necessary to bring bridges back to a minimum level of functionality that enables their use for emergency response were computed using the methodology specified in the Bridge Reopening Times section. Refer to the BSST Technical Report. The BSST was developed to assess the potential impacts of a CSZ earthquake to highway bridges in Washington State at a system-level as part of the Washington State Transportation Systems RRAP project. The results provided identify the Damage Levels, Damage Types, Repair Types and Reopening Times associated with 2,717 bridges located in Western and Central Washington that were evaluated for this RRAP project. Understanding that this analysis likely constitutes a “worst-case scenario” with respect to bridge damage, the results nonetheless project that the majority of bridges in Washington State will experience moderate to significant damage resulting from a CSZ earthquake. While the majority of bridges that experience damage could be reopened within one year of the earthquake, a substantial number of those bridges (28.7 percent) are projected to take more than a year to reopen—in many cases 2 or more years. The results also project that while many bridges may be reopened after either minor repairs/inspections or the construction of a temporary bypass road, a substantial number of more significantly damaged bridges (797 structures) span bodies of water and will require complete replacement prior to reopening. This suggests that significant gains in roadway corridor reopening times could be gained by focusing on retrofits or upgrades to these more vulnerable bridges that span rivers and other bodies of water. This tool is primarily intended to inform regional highway prioritization for emergency response activities; however, the BSST provides a useful evaluation methodology that could be applied to other regional emergency preparedness and infrastructure assessment studies. This could include studies of bridge infrastructure to other potential seismic events within the region, or at varying jurisdictional levels (i.e., county, local). The BSST also uses currently available seismic, seismically-induced secondary hazard and infrastructure information. As new seismic information becomes available, or as secondary-hazards (e.g., landslides, avalanches) become characterized more comprehensively, such information could be integrated into the current BSST methodology. Similarly, as seismic retrofit activities or other infrastructure improvement projects continue throughout Washington State, or as new infrastructure are built, it will be important that the infrastructure data integrated in the BSST also be updated periodically. Doing so will ensure that planners and infrastructure managers maintain the most current and complete understanding of the network-level seismic risks of a CSZ event to Washington State highways.Please note that all results from the BSST are based on a model and information received from WSDOT. Damages from an earthquake may be different that what is provided here. Liquefaction data was used within the BSST tool. WADNR is the source for liquefaction data and is available here: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/geology/geologic-hazards/geologic-hazard-maps#nehrp-site-class-and-liquefaction-susceptibilityUSGS ShakeMap was also used in the BSST tool for a M9.0 Cascadia earthquake and is available here: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/scenarios/eventpage/gllegacycasc9p0expanded_se/shakemap/pga. DHS distributed this data to WSDOT on August 22, 2019.23 years ago
- This dataset shows the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe as defined by WDFW’s Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) program. It shows where WDFW recommends counties and cities require site-specific information be gathered to inform site-scale land use decisions. It is not designed to directly inform parcel-scale land use decisions, rather it is designed to be used as a flagging tool. As such, if this dataset errs, it is more likely to over-identify shrubsteppe and eastside steppe than under-identify. It is “best available science” regarding the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe in Washington.<o:p></o:p>23 years ago
- This dataset shows the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe as defined by WDFW’s Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) program. It shows where WDFW recommends counties and cities require site-specific information be gathered to inform site-scale land use decisions. It is not designed to directly inform parcel-scale land use decisions, rather it is designed to be used as a flagging tool. As such, if this dataset errs, it is more likely to over-identify shrubsteppe and eastside steppe than under-identify. It is “best available science” regarding the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe in Washington.<o:p></o:p>23 years ago
- This dataset shows the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe as defined by WDFW’s Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) program. It shows where WDFW recommends counties and cities require site-specific information be gathered to inform site-scale land use decisions. It is not designed to directly inform parcel-scale land use decisions, rather it is designed to be used as a flagging tool. As such, if this dataset errs, it is more likely to over-identify shrubsteppe and eastside steppe than under-identify. It is “best available science” regarding the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe in Washington.<o:p></o:p>23 years ago
- This layer represents the three year mean concentration of annual PM2.5 for 2009-2011 from AIRPACT. A detailed description can be found here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=473463 years ago
- This layer represents the count of all commercial Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities (TSDF) facilities within 5 km, divided by distance, presented as population-weighted averages of blocks in each census tract. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=472763 years ago
- This layer represents exposure to traffic-related air pollution, which has been associated with adverse health effects such as cardiovascular disease mortality, respiratory health and an increased risk of low birth weight. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=570 63 years ago
- This layer represents the three year mean concentration of daily maximum 8-hour rolling averaged ozone for 2009-2011 from AIRPACT. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=473363 years ago
- This layer represents a combined ranking of Lead Risk, Proximity to Hazardous Waste Facilities, NPL Sites, Proximity to RMP Facilities and Wastewater Discharge. More information is available here https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtnibl/WTNIBL/.63 years ago
- This layer represents the percentage of people who have not received a high school diploma or GED by the age of 25. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=138363 years ago
- This layer represents the population of people 16 years and older that are in the labor force and registered as unemployed. This measure was derived from the following ACS Table "Employment Status" (DP03) columns HC02_VC05, HC01_VC07. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=62763 years ago
- This layer represents the percentage of the population five years and older with limited English proficiency (LEP). LEP is defined as those who speak English less than "very well" or "not at all". A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=62063 years ago
- This layer represents the proportion of deaths in a population due to cardiovascular disease (NCHS 113: Major cardiovascular diseases). The rate represents the age adjusted rate per 100,000 population. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=82163 years ago
- This layer represents the count of sites proposed and listed on the National Priorities List (NPL), directly downloaded from EJSCREEN in 2017. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=472963 years ago
- This layer represents the proximity of facilities with a Risk Management Plan (RMP) by displaying the count of facilities within 5 km of a tract divided by the distance of the facility. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=473063 years ago
- Noise walls are free-standing barriers built parallel to a highway. They are usually found near public areas, such as parks, and residential areas. The walls range in height from 6 to 20 feet, but are normally 12 to 15 feet tall. They can reduce noise levels by 10 to 15 decibels, cutting the loudness of traffic noise in half. Barriers can be formed from earth berms, or constructed of wood, stucco, concrete, masonry, metal, or other materials. This feature class contains Type I and Type II noise walls that have been constructed. This data has been synchronized with the LRS dated December 31, 2018. Data appended April 202283 years ago
- This dataset is to inform WSDOT and other state agencies of a known invasive species currently found in Washington State waterways. The New Zealand Mud Snail (NZMS) has been identified in a number of locations throughout the state. If in-water work is necessary within water bodies or connecting tributaries within a two-mile radius of the documented location (latitude and longitude), all personal gear (waders, tools, instruments, etc.) and heavy equipment must be fully decontaminated before being used at any other site. Transport to a secure site for cleaning/decontamination is allowed as long as precautions are taken to avoid any dropping of mud or debris between the work site and the cleaning/decontamination location.This dataset is used as a general reference layer for geographic information systems at the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). It is maintained by the WSDOT ESO office. Updates to this dataset are on an as needed basis.83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This dataset displays the aviation related businesses within Washington State. Industry sectors were selected that include businesses with a high propensity to rely on aviation services as part of their typical business activities. These activities include scheduled commercial service, general aviation, and air cargo. Industry types were identified by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code based on the findings of numerous economic impact studies conducted for state departments of transportation and individual airports across the U.S. and in close consultation with WSDOT Aviation. Information was collected from ESRI’s Community Analyst application in September 2019. This data is provided to the public as courtesy for general aviation planning purposes. The information provided should not be relied upon for navigational, engineering, legal or other site-specific uses. It may not show an airport's current capabilities or configuration. Inaccuracies in the layer may be attributed to: spatial errors in data, airport construction, or recent changes in airport capabilities. If you have any questions about the information presented here, please contact John MacArthur, john.macarthur@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- A point dataset of historical test borings drilled by the WSDOT Geotechnical Office and consultants to WSDOT. This dataset has links to boring log pdfs. The borings in this dataset were drilled before the use of gINT database software. The locations of the borings in this dataset are approximate and are not implied as having any specific spatial accuracy. They were located using one of the following processes: georeferenced historical plan sheets, alignment with stationing and offset, address description or coordinates. This data should only be used as reference. The dataset is not a complete set of historical borings. Borings are continually being added project by project as needed.83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- Linear dataset of links to historical geotechnical documents. The locations of the features in this dataset are approximate and are not implied as having any specific spatial accuracy. They were located using one of the following processes: georeferenced historical plan sheets, alignment with stationing and offset, address description or coordinates. This data should only be used as reference. The dataset is not a complete statewide set. Features are continually being added project by project as needed.83 years ago
- PCC Lines are shown by major branch lines. This data is used as 1) a linear referencing system (LRS); 2) for locating features on the PCC system by milepost value. PCC lines were built using existing data sources including railroad line track charts, track right-of-way maps, and recently digitized linework based off aeiral photos. In LRS, the locations of both data and events are determined according to their distance along a railroad line from some known point (e.g., the beginning of the line or line segment, a mile marker, a junction with another rail line, or a railroad crossing).83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This layer represents the three year mean concentration of daily maximum 8-hour rolling averaged ozone for 2009-2011 from AIRPACT. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=473363 years ago
- This layer represents the three year mean concentration of annual PM2.5 for 2009-2011 from AIRPACT. A detailed description can be found here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=473463 years ago
- This layer represents the transportation costs based on percentage of income for the regional moderate household. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=86263 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This layer represents the percentage of people who have not received a high school diploma or GED by the age of 25. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=138363 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- Combined incorporated city limit boundaries and unincorporated Urban Growth Areas (UGA) as defined by the Growth Management Act. Updates made in 2020 were made by collecting city limits and urban growth area boundary information from each of Washington's 39 counties, where available, and the Washington State Department of Transportation. Layer updated to geo.wa.gov on May 17, 2021.63 years ago
- 3 years ago
- This layer represents a combined ranking of Limited English, No HS Diploma, Race/Ethnicity, Poverty, Unaffordable Housing and Percent Unemployed.63 years ago
- This layer represents a combined ranking of Diesel Emissions, Ozone, PM 2.5, Traffic and Toxic Releases.63 years ago
- Welcome to Washington state's PCC system map application! To get started, press the View Application button in the upper-right corner of this page.This web map application includes the following geospatial data:1. Geospatial data for PCC system: PCC Public Grade Crossings: point locations of public grade crossings on PCC rail system. This data shows information such as UTC number, USDOT number, active protection, type of crossing, and location information. PCC Rail Bridges: point locations of bridges on PCC rail system. For bridges with multiple sections, a separate point location is created for each section. This data shows information such as milepost, section length, estimated height, spans, and type. PCC Rail Stations: point locations of rail stations on PCC rail system. These are not passenger train stations, but are locations where freight is loaded onto or unloaded off railroad trains. PCC Rail Line Segments: segments of PCC branch lines. This data shows information such as railroad name, owner, operator, beginning and ending locations of line segments, and confidence level in data accuracy.PCC Right-of-way Lines: a high-level sketch of right-of-way lines for PCC rail lines in Eastern Washington. Due to the different accuracy levels of the source material, the right-of-way lines are a generalized representation of the right-of-way line locations. Do not use this as authoritative right-of-way location.PCC Mileposts: mileposts at one-mile increments along PCC rail lines for reference purpose. Milepost labels are visible when zoomed to 1:160,000 map scale.2. Public data from Washington Geospatial Open Data Portal:Washington State Parcels: provides a statewide data set of tax parcels and ownership and taxpayer attributes that cover Washington State counties that currently have digital tax parcels. Please note, that due to such a large dataset, this layer is visible when zoomed to 1:160,000 map scale.State Routes: Interstate, US Highway and State Routes of Washington State.Washington State Rail Lines: rail lines of Washington State depicted as linework. Each separately owned mainline route is depicted as a single line.City Limits: areas which depict the boundaries of Washington State's incorporated municipalities. Public Roads: Washington State Routes and Local Agency Public Roads for the state of WashingtonTownship, Range, & Section: Townships, Section, and Range information for the State of Washington. Please note, that due to such a large dataset, this layer is visible when zoomed to 1:160,000 map scale.County Boundaries: boundary lines for all Washington State counties.Region Boundaries: boundary lines for all Washington State regions.WSDOT Base Map: this base map includes highways, local roads, railways, water features, administrative boundaries, cities, and parks overlaid on shaded relief imagery for added context.23 years ago
- 3 years ago
- This dataset shows the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe as defined by WDFW’s Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) program. It shows where WDFW recommends counties and cities require site-specific information be gathered to inform site-scale land use decisions. It is not designed to directly inform parcel-scale land use decisions, rather it is designed to be used as a flagging tool. As such, if this dataset errs, it is more likely to over-identify shrubsteppe and eastside steppe than under-identify. It is “best available science” regarding the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe in Washington.23 years ago
- This project eliminates barriers for fish and provides access to upstream habitat for approximately 29-identified streams or culverts that are out-of-date and needing correction. The end result will simulate what is found in a natural stream bed for salmon and resident fish. WSDOT and the Design-Build contractor will consult with local stakeholders on potential detour routes and the length of highway closures for vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians. Once complete, this project will restore nearly 37 miles of potential habitat across the Olympic Peninsula.23 years ago
- This layer represents the overall ranking for Environmental Exposures, Environmental Effects, Socioeconomic Factors and Sensitive Populations. More information is available here https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtnibl/WTNIBL/.13 years ago
- This layer represents a combined ranking of Deaths from Cardiovascular Disease and Low Birth Weight.63 years ago
- This map displays test borings drilled by the WSDOT Geotechnical Office. The datasets contain test boring locations, test boring depths, and the soils, rock, and groundwater encountered during the drilling of the test boring, as well as any laboratory testing results. The purpose of the map is to disseminate subsurface data spatially. The datasets were developed through gINT, a geotechnical data management software program.For questions concerning the data in this map, please contact: Tracy Trople, GIS Analyst TropleT@wsdot.wa.gov23 years ago
- Salt and liquid deicer storage facilities for winter operations. Materials are measured in tons and gallons. This dataset provides faciliy locations for the WinterOperations Ap[plication and WebMap.83 years ago
- This data set depicts Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and Washington State Patrol (WSP) fueling stations.83 years ago
- This data set is a linear depiction of railway mainline rights of way. Included are the active rail lines as well as the abandoned lines. Each separately owned mainline route is depicted as a single line--multiple tracks, sidings, yards, and industrial spurs are not shown.83 years ago
- Washington State Department of Transportation region boundaries depicted as polygons.83 years ago
- Regional Maintenance Area boundaries of the Washington State Department of Transportation are depicted as polygons.83 years ago
- Routes of vessels providing scheduled, public car ferry service in the waters of Washington State are depicted as linear features. Known private, provincial, tribal and passenger-only ferry services are also shown.83 years ago
- This data depicts the locations of ferry terminals in Washington State.83 years ago
- Level of service standard for ferry routes is based on the Washington State Department of Transportation Ferries Division Final Long-Range Plan.83 years ago
- Point locations of major freight intermodal facilities in Washington state. This data contains information about major freight intermodal facilities in Washington state, including cargo airports, rail intermodal terminals, and major ports handling freight shipment. The data includes facility name, type, ownership, and location.83 years ago
- Point file of all incorporated cities in the state of Washington. Points were taken from the main polygon for each incorporated entity shown in the City Limits of Washington State data set.83 years ago
- 3 years ago
- Regional Maintenance Area boundaries of the Washington State Department of Transportation are depicted as polygons.83 years ago
- The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Aviation Division conducted an Aviation Economic Impact Study (AEIS) of Washington’s 134 public-use airports to measure the annual economic impact that airports provide to local communities, geographic regions, and statewide. This layer presents the finds of that study.83 years ago
- Washington State Department of Transportation's six region boundaries are depicted as polygons.83 years ago
- This dataset is used as a general reference layer of Seismic Lifelines identified by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). It is maintained by the WSDOT Office of Emergency Management. Updates to this dataset are on an as needed basis. This dataset is a snapshot of Seismic Lifelines along the roadway system, effective 12/31/2019. Data provided here is used by WSDOT's transportation partners, government entities, schools, private businesses, and the general public.83 years ago
- Rail lines of Washington State depicted as linework. Each separately owned mainline route is depicted as a single line. Principle routes are shown with selected sidings and yards. Selected bridges and tunnels are depicted cartographically.83 years ago
- This feature class contains environmentally sensitive areas that front state highways, including wetlands, waterbodies, streams, and channel migration zones. Roadway segments within 300 feet of a sensitive area were located using GPS. The sensitive areas are represented by lines segments which have had their beginning and ending points buffered an additional 300 feet. Data has been synchronized to the LRS December, 31 2017.83 years ago
- This data set is a linear representation of Washington State Routes that are designated as part of the Scenic and Recreational Highway System by RCW47.39.020 and RCW47.42.140. Each Scenic Highway is represented by a single line regardless of whether or not the highway is divided.83 years ago
- This dataset provides directional traffic data for application to the modified, or full design level matrix in Chapters 430, or 440 of the Design Manual to establish the appropriate design class for the Design Elements of a project. Updated DHV values and SRMPs have been added.63 years ago
- 2011 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures and total truck percentages for state highway traffic count locations monitored by WSDOT's Statewide Travel and Collision Data Office. Figures represent all directions of travel at the given location.63 years ago
- This dataset provides directional traffic data for application to the modified, or full design level matrix in Chapters 430, or 440 of the Design Manual to establish the appropriate design class for the Design Elements of a project. Updated DHV values and SRMPs have been added.63 years ago
- This dataset provides directional traffic data for application to the modified, or full design level matrix in Chapters 430, or 440 of the Design Manual to establish the appropriate design class for the Design Elements of a project. Updated DHV values and SRMPs have been added.63 years ago
- 2014 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures and total truck percentages for state highway traffic count locations monitored by WSDOT's Transportation Data and GIS Office. Figures represent all directions of travel at the given location.63 years ago
- 2015 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures and total truck percentages for state highway traffic count locations monitored by WSDOT's Transportation Data and GIS Office. Figures represent all directions of travel at the given location.63 years ago
- This dataset provides directional traffic data for application to the modified, or full design level matrix in Chapters 430, or 440 of the Design Manual to establish the appropriate design class for the Design Elements of a project. Updated DHV values and SRMPs have been added.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- 2012 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures and total truck percentages for state highway traffic count locations monitored by WSDOT's Statewide Travel and Collision Data Office. Figures represent all directions of travel at the given location.63 years ago
- PCC Lines are shown by rail line segments. This feature class was built using existing data sources including railroad line track charts, track right-of-way maps, and recently digitized linework based off aerial photos.83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- Point locations of rail bridges on the PCC rail system. The locations are placed by latitude and longitude coordinates. For bridges with multiple sections, a separate point location is created for each section.83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- Rail stations along the PCC rail line. These are not passenger train stations, but are locations where freight is loaded onto or unloaded off railroad trains. Stations were placed using latitude and longitude coordinates.83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- Point locations of public at-grade crossings on PCC rail system. Locations are placed by latitude and longitude coordinates.83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- Mileposts at one-mile increments along PCC rail lines for reference purpose. The mileposts are placed as point locations using PCC linear referencing system (LRS).83 years ago
- 2016 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures for state highway traffic count locations. Figures represent all directions of travel at the given location.63 years ago
- 2017 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures for state highway traffic count locations. Data represents all directions of travel for the given location.63 years ago
- 2018 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures for state highway traffic count locations. Data represents all directions of travel for the given location.63 years ago
- A data set to provide 2016 estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic volumes along the state highway system. Data represents all directions of travel for the given roadway segment.63 years ago
- 2017 estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic volumes along the state highway system. Data represents all directions of travel for the given roadway segment.63 years ago
- 2018 estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic volumes along the state highway system. Data represents all directions of travel for the given roadway segment.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- 2019 estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic volumes along the state highway system. Data represents all directions of travel for the given roadway segment.63 years ago
- Please direct questions about this dataset to Paul Abbott at paul.abbott@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- 2020 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures for state highway traffic count locations. Data represents all directions of travel for the given location.83 years ago
- This file contains information about park and ride lots across Washington State. The data includes information on park and ride lot locations and number of parking stalls. WSDOT cannot guarantee the accuracy of this data because most park and ride lots are operated by other agencies or jurisdictions. Refer to field PublishDate to determine date of data.83 years ago
- Please direct questions about this dataset to Paul Abbott at paul.abbott@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- 2020 estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic volumes along the state highway system. Data represents all directions of travel for the given roadway segment.83 years ago
- 2009 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures and total truck percentages for state highway traffic count locations monitored by WSDOT's Statewide Travel and Collision Data Office. Figures represent all directions of travel at the given location.63 years ago
- 2005 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures and total truck percentages for state highway traffic count locations monitored by WSDOT's Transportation Data Office. Figures represent all directions of travel at the given location.83 years ago
- 2006 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures and total truck percentages for state highway traffic count locations monitored by WSDOT's Transportation Data Office. Figures represent all directions of travel at the given location.83 years ago
- 2008 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures and total truck percentages for state highway traffic count locations monitored by WSDOT's Transportation Data Office. Figures represent all directions of travel at the given location.83 years ago
- This dataset provides directional traffic data for application to the modified, or full design level matrix in Chapters 430, or 440 of the Design Manual to establish the appropriate design class for the Design Elements of a project. Updated DHV values and SRMPs have been added.83 years ago
- 2007 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures and total truck percentages for state highway traffic count locations monitored by WSDOT's Transportation Data Office. Figures represent all directions of travel at the given location.83 years ago
- 2010 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures and total truck percentages for state highway traffic count locations monitored by WSDOT's Statewide Travel and Collision Data Office. Figures represent all directions of travel at the given location.83 years ago
- This dataset provides directional traffic data for application to the modified, or full design level matrix in Chapters 430, or 440 of the Design Manual to establish the appropriate design class for the Design Elements of a project. Updated DHV values and SRMPs have been added.83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) buildings. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description - Project Engineering SiteTypically a stand-alone office building that supports planning, design, and project engineering activities. May support more than one Maintenance Area.83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- Pollinators are critically important for food production and healthy ecosystems. Pollinator populations such as wild and domesticated bees, monarch butterflies, and many other butterfly species are in decline nationally. Enhancing, restoring, and maintaining linear roadside habitat for pollinators can provide connections for pollinators to disperse between agriculture fields and other natural habitat areas. Pollinator Habitat Ranks identifies high value areas for creating, preserving, or enhancing pollinator habitat on WSDOT owned lands along the state highway system. Three separate models were developed that ranked state routes for monarch habitat, pollinator habitat, and urban gateway pollinator habitat for every half mile highway segment. Monarch ranks were based on the proximity of highway segments to suitable monarch and milkweed habitat as identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s habitat suitability index model. Pollinator ranks were based on the proximity of highway segments to pollinator dependent crops, protected public and private lands, wetland and riparian habitats, native and natural vegetation cover, oak/grassland habitat, and rare and imperiled animal pollinated plant species. Urban gateway ranks were applied to highway segments that intersected with urban areas and the proximity of the highway segment to protected public and private lands, wetland and riparian habitats, native and natural vegetation cover, oak/grassland habitat, and rare and imperiled animal pollinated plant species. Updated 201883 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This dataset provides directional traffic data for application to the modified, or full design level matrix in Chapters 430, or 440 of the Design Manual to establish the appropriate design class for the Design Elements of a project. Updated DHV values and SRMPs have been added.83 years ago
- This dataset provides directional traffic data for application to the modified, or full design level matrix in Chapters 430, or 440 of the Design Manual to establish the appropriate design class for the Design Elements of a project. Updated DHV values and SRMPs have been added.83 years ago
- This layer represents a combined ranking of Diesel Emissions, Ozone, PM 2.5, Traffic and Toxic Releases.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) buildings. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description -Safety Rest AreasEach Safety Rest Area is comprised of a network of buildings and major site utilities that support services to the travelling public at that location (e.g., a public restroom, wellhouse, and wastewater pump station).83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) sites. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description - Regionwide Support FacilitySpecialized facilities that support statewide or regionwide needs such as materials laboratories, sign fabrication, or traffic and signals shops.83 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) sites. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description - Safety Rest AreasEach Safety Rest Area is comprised of a network of buildings and major site utilities that support services to the travelling public at that location (e.g., a public restroom, wellhouse, and wastewater pump station).83 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) sites. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description - Project Engineering SiteTypically a stand-alone office building that supports planning, design, and project engineering activities. May support more than one Maintenance Area.63 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows tunnels along State Routes. Details include: tunnel length (in miles), structure number, structure ID, and structure narrative. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- Winter recreation sled dog trails. This trail system consists of old logging roads, a portion of the Palouse to Cascades State Park Trail and utility corridors making a great hilly, curvy sled dog trail system in the winter. The terrain is forested with some sections in the open.AttributesTrailNumAssigned trail number, if known.CommonName Assigned trail name, if known.MilesLength of trail in miles.63 years ago
- * Data last updated February 6th, 2019, with data for surveys carried out in 2018 for the following parks: Burrows Island, Ginkgo Petrified Forest, Jones Island, South Whidbey, Spokane River Centennial, Sucia Island, and Ginkgo Petrified Forest. Metadata is undergoing review and revision.Vegetation communities within Washington State Parks were delineated and classified using a combination of field survey and remote sensing techniques. Surveyors relied on descriptions from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WADNR) late-seral forested plant associations of the Puget Lowland (Chappell 2005), freshwater wetland vegetation (Kunze 1994), and intertidal vegetation (Kunze and Cornelius 1982) to make final vegetation community assignments. In some cases, the WADNR descriptions were not adequate in describing existing vegetation associations. In these cases, alternative vegetation communities or plant associations were created by PBI.Remote sensing techniques consisted of manually delineating plant associations or mosaics of plant associations in a digital environment. Orthorectified aerial photography and LANDSAT Thematic Mapper satellite images were reviewed for discernable vegetation or landform patterns. When available, we also high-resolution true color orthorectified aerial photography was also used. Topographic maps, digital elevation models (DEMs), and light detection and ranging imagery (LIDAR) were also employed (where available) to assist the process of vegetation community delineation. The vegetation polygons were created by hand in GIS by ocular assessment. Field surveys consisted of visiting sites located within the vegetation polygons created during the remote sensing process. At representative sites within a polygon, vegetation data and site descriptions were recorded in a fashion consistent with the plant community polygon format. Further refinements and editing of the initial vegetation polygon layers were done by hand on hard copy maps in the field, and later edited digitally in GIS to create the final vegetation polygon layer.63 years ago
- WSDOT template for Esri file geodatabase line feature class. Template has pre-defined attribute schema to help users create data that is more consistent or compliant with agency standards. Metadata has been created using the FGDC metadata style but stored in the ArcGIS format. Content presentation will change upon export to FGDC format.This service is maintained by the WSDOT Transportation Data, GIS & Modeling Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please contact Online Map Support at onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. 83 years ago
- WSDOT template for Esri file geodatabase polygon feature class. Template has pre-defined attribute schema to help users create data that is more consistent or compliant with agency standards. Metadata has been created using the FGDC metadata style but stored in the ArcGIS format. Content presentation will change upon export to FGDC format.This service is maintained by the WSDOT Transportation Data, GIS & Modeling Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please contact Online Map Support at onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. 83 years ago
- WSDOT template for Esri file geodatabase point feature class. Template has pre-defined attribute schema to help users create data that is more consistent or compliant with agency standards. Metadata has been created using the FGDC metadata style but stored in the ArcGIS format. Content presentation will change upon export to FGDC format.This service is maintained by the WSDOT Transportation Data, GIS & Modeling Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please contact Online Map Support at onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. 83 years ago
- This is an extract from the TRansportation Information and Planning Support (TRIPS) mainframe database for Federal and State Functional Classifications along State Routes. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- Combined incorporated city limit boundaries and unincorporated Urban Growth Areas (UGA) as defined by the Growth Management Act. Updates carried out in 2020 were made by collecting city limits and urban growth area boundary information from each of Washington's 39 counties, where available, and the Washington State Department of Transportation. Layer last updated on May 17th, 2021. Republished in Nov. 21, 2022 to streamline the feature service name.63 years ago
- This is an extract from the TRansportation Information and Planning Support (TRIPS) mainframe database for National Highway System (NHS) Route events along State Routes. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This layer represents the Washington Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) as mapped for 2019 by WA State Dept. of Natural Resources - Wildfire & Forest Health Divisions under consultation from the USFS Rocky Mtn Research Station. The Dept was required by SB 6109 to map the WUI in WA State for the purpose of county-based building code adoptions. The WUI depicts areas of WA where structures and wildland overlap with specific structure densities. For more information about the WUI, please contact: ashley.blazina@dnr.wa.govDownload *.TIF and File Geodatabase objects93 years ago
- Outlines of parking areas within Washington State Parks. Updated July 21, 2020.Attribute Definitions: ParkName - The name of the WA State Park that contains the parking area. Surface - The surface of the parking area, if known. Paved, gravel, native material, etc. Capacity - Number of standard automobile parking spots, where visible in aerial photography. Typically only for paved parking areas with striping visible. Acres - The area of the metal detection area polygon, in acres, as calculated in GIS (ArcGIS Pro).63 years ago
- Polygons depict 10 year time of travel estimates for active group a public drinking water supplies. Source location data were obtained from the Washington State Department of Health, Office of Drinking Water. This layer is used in the Source Water Assessment Protection application https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/swap/index.html. Data is updated Monday mornings. Check the "Data updated:" date in the Details section. Metadata dates are not automatically updated.63 years ago
- This was created using the Feature Outline Mask tool in ArcGIS 10.2.2. The feature outline mask was applied to the State of WA boundary layer and a tolerance of 5 points was used. Then a polygon was created which is the extent of the world. Finally, the mask was used to cut a hole in the world extent polygon. This is the result you will see in this layer.63 years ago
- A bug has been logged for the 403 error which is generated when trying to download large datasets through the Download menu. As a workaround, the zipped file geodatabase is available here:https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/d04a50e44fbd4497bb57830b52fe5a2b/dataThe Washington State Land Use coverage was produced from digital county tax parcel layers using Department of Revenue (DOR) two digit land use codes (see; WAC 458-53-030, Stratification of assessment rolls - real property). Land use attribute data has been normalized for all county parcel data to conform to the two digit DOR codes. All county parcel layers are dissolved using the normalized land use code. No county parcel information remains in this data other that what geometry remains from the dissolve process.63 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows Railroad Crossings that are at the same grade as the state route. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov. Other notes: RRXingGradeInd attribute definition does not include detail about what the code values mean.83 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows increasing and decreasing number of lanes along State Routes. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows shoulder width, surface type, and orientation to the roadway along State Routes. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows access control information along State Routes. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows divided highways in Washington State. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please note, this data depicts divided highways for State Route mainlines only (ie. Ramps are not included). Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows median widths and barrier and surface types along State Routes. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows legal speed limits along State Routes. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows lanes designated for turn movements at intersection locations along State Routes. Details include: turn lane length, width, left/right indicator, and near/far indicator. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows roadway width (feet) information along State Routes. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows Rural and Urban indicators along State Routes. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows access control information along State Routes. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- Washington State Parks Winter Recreation Program manages more than 3,000 miles of groomed snowmobile trails, 300 miles of cross-country trails and five Snow Play Sno-Parks. Altogether, Washington state has more than 120 Sno-Parks, located on State Parks, U.S. Forest Service and Department of Natural Resources lands. The Winter Recreation Program manages Sno-Parks (cleared parking areas) in close proximity to groomed and backcountry trails. There are approximately 80 Sno-Parks with access to trail designated primarily for snowmobiling.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "WSPRC" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).AttributesNameName of the trail.Type_of_TrUse type of the trail.AreaCodeArea code trail falls under.ProperNameOfficial agency name of trailCommonNameNickname of trail/unoffical trail name that recreationists use.CommentsGeneral comentsDistMilesLength of trail in miles.OwnerOwner of the land that the trail runs through.63 years ago
- Polygons depict default assigned 1,000 ft. time of travel estimates for active group a public drinking water supplies. Source location data were obtained from the Washington State Department of Health, Office of Drinking Water. This layer is used in the Source Water Assessment Protection application https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/swap/index.html. Data is updated Monday mornings. Check the "Data updated:" date in the Details section. Metadata dates are not automatically updated.63 years ago
- GIS layers symbolizing various data in the WSPMS database Preservation UnitsA brief user guide is located at: https://data.wsdot.wa.gov/geospatial/DOT_WSPMS/WSPMSFeatureClassFieldDescription.docx83 years ago
- This feature class contains the case area boundary for U. S. District Court Injunction No. C70-9213, Subproceeding No. 01-1, the U.S. versus Washington State (US v. WA). In 2001, 21 western Washington treaty tribes filed suit in U.S. District Court alleging that the existence of State-owned barrier culverts under roads were a violation of treaty rights. On March 29, 2013, U.S. District Court Judge Martinez agreed with the tribes and issued a permanent injunction for the state to accelerate barrier correction on salmon and steelhead streams within the area of the state covered by the Stevens Treaties. The case area is comprised of Water Resource Inventory Areas 1 to 23.83 years ago
- This GIS data shows the locations of WSDOT road crossings, including culverts, dams, bridges, and fishways.The GIS data contains attributes identifying location information in latitude and longitude, as well as state plane coordinates and state route and milepost. Additional attributes include indicators for fish use, barrier status, and fish species. It is a subset of data compiled and extracted from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) Fish Passage and Diversion Screening Inventory (FPDSI) database. It includes data compiled from several WDFW and non-WDFW fish passage barrier inventory efforts.83 years ago
- This data represents a statewide catalogue of avalanche paths. The paths are grouped by geographic regions across State and Federal transportation corridors within Washington. Data consists of individual path polygons and corresponding oblique photos. Attributes include frequency, magnitude, elevations, aspect, terrain characteristics, historical occurrences and other pertinent information. The data is updated and edited as needed. Ownership is shared by WSDOT Avalanche Forecasters and GIS & Data Systems Groups. Any questions can be directed to WSDOT Regional Avalanche Supervisors in North Central or South Central Regions as well as to HQMaintenanceTechnologyGroup@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- Polygons depict 6 month time of travel estimates for active group a public drinking water supplies. Source location data were obtained from the Washington State Department of Health, Office of Drinking Water. This layer is used in the Source Water Assessment Protection application https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/swap/index.html. Data is updated Monday mornings. Check the "Data updated:" date in the Details section. Metadata dates are not automatically updated.63 years ago
- Polygons depict default 600ft. time of travel estimates for active group b public drinking water supplies. Source location data were obtained from the Washington State Department of Health, Office of Drinking Water. This layer is used in the Source Water Assessment Protection application https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/swap/index.html. Data is updated Monday mornings. Check the "Data updated:" date in the Details section. Metadata dates are not automatically updated.63 years ago
- This is a view of the DischargePoint featureclass created with the following query: LifeCycleCurrentStatus= 'Active' AND (WSDOTownership in ('Yes', 'Unknown') OR WSDOTownership IS NULL) AND SWLocationVerified = 'Yes' This feature class contains WSDOT’s stormwater discharge points. A stormwater discharge point is the point at which WSDOT loses, or obtains, jurisdictional responsibility of concentrated stormwater from a constructed stormwater conveyance feature. This includes locations where stormwater infiltrates into the ground at the end of a constructed stormwater conveyance, or enters surface waters of the state through a constructed stormwater conveyance. The majority of the data collected so far are within the Phase I and Phase II 2009 NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit Areas. Additional data were collected during stormwater retrofit review and mapping in Total Maximum Daily Load areas that are outside of the permit area. This feature class has five subtypes: Incoming, Land Surface, Managed System, Subsurface, and Surface Water.83 years ago
- This GIS data shows locations across the state where WSDOT fish barrier corrections have been completed. Some of the WSDOT fish passage barriers that have been reported as replaced or retrofitted for fish passage may require additional work to meet current fish passage criteria. Corrected sites can become barriers due to physical deterioration of the fish passage structure itself or changes in the landscape and streambed.This GIS data is a subset of data compiled and extracted from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) Fish Passage and Diversion Screening Inventory (FPDSI) database. It includes data compiled from several WDFW and non-WDFW fish passage barrier inventory efforts.83 years ago
- This GIS data shows the locations of WSDOT fish passage barriers subject to the federal court injunction that have been corrected.This GIS data is a subset of data compiled and extracted from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) Fish Passage and Diversion Screening Inventory (FPDSI) database. It includes data compiled from several WDFW and non-WDFW fish passage barrier inventory efforts.83 years ago
- This GIS data shows the locations of WSDOT fish passage barriers on the current injunction list. This GIS data is a subset of data compiled and extracted from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) Fish Passage and Diversion Screening Inventory (FPDSI) database. It includes data compiled from several WDFW and non-WDFW fish passage barrier inventory efforts. This dataset is updated quarterly. For questions, email Katrina Keleher at Katrina.Keleher@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) buildings. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description - Pits, Quarries, Stockpile, and Waste SiteLess-developed land used intermittently to quarry, process, and store consumable highway maintenance products such as sand or gravel. Typically supports one or no buildings and serves highway segments that are in proximity to the site.83 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) buildings. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description - Regionwide Support FacilitySpecialized facilities that support statewide or regionwide needs such as materials laboratories, sign fabrication, or traffic and signals shops.83 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) buildings. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description - Section Maintenance FacilitySecondary maintenance facility located to serve specific highway segments within a Maintenance Area. This type of facility may specialize in materials or equipment storage that meet the specific needs of a particular locale (e.g., snow and ice fighting equipment in mountainous areas)83 years ago
- Input datasets:Washington Department of Ecology: Case Culverts (2015); WRIA (2000)Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife: Case Culverts (2015)Washington Department of Natural Resources: Case Culverts (2015); Non-DNR Major Public Lands (2014)Washington Department of Parks: Case Culverts (2015)Washington Department of Transportation: Case Culverts (2015)63 years ago
- Input datasets:Washington Department of Ecology: HUC-12; Water Well Logs (2015-01-13)63 years ago
- This geospatial vector data set represents as described in solid waste collection companies Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity issued to regulated Solid Waste Transportation Company by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission.63 years ago
- This coverage divides Washington State into two sections, Eastern Washington and Western Washington, for the purpose of implementing the Forest Practices Rules. See WAC 222-16-010 *General definitions: "Eastern Washington" and "Western Washington".83 years ago
- 30-60-90-minute drive-time polygons towards WA State Park entrance points. Feature layer generated from running the Create Drive Times solution.Analysis run on February 10, 2023. Settings used:1. Source layer: Park Entrances2. Measure: Driving time, 30- 60- 90-minutes, not using traffic, travel direction Towards Facility3. Areas from different points: Overlap63 years ago
- Input datasets:Washington Department of Ecology: Case Culverts (2015); WRIA (2000)Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife: Case Culverts (2015)Washington Department of Natural Resources: Case Culverts (2015); Non-DNR Major Public Lands (2014)Washington Department of Parks: Case Culverts (2015)Washington Department of Transportation: Case Culverts (2015)63 years ago
- Input datasets:Washington Department of Ecology: HUC-12; Water Well Logs (2015-01-13)63 years ago
- This data set contains analysis results for the Spring-Summer Marine Bird and Mammal Surveys conducted in Puget Sound annually. This is a zipped (compressed) file geodatabase containing GIS data and must be downloaded, unzipped and viewed in using GIS software such as ArcMap or ArcGIS Pro. This package includes analysis strata and a table of abundance estimates. <o:p></o:p> This geodatabase contains the following datasets: MRB_Strata (polygon), MRB_AbundanceEstimates (table).<o:p></o:p>23 years ago
- Public beaches that the DOH recommends for potential shellfish harvesting.63 years ago
- This layer depicts approximate locations of where the public enters a State Parks property. It's intended use is for drive-time analysis; in other words, to calculate the area within a 30/60/90 minute drive of the park entrance. These locations are sometimes open to interpretation. Locations do not necessarily imply that public access is possible. Locations interpreted by inspecting GIS data and aerial photographs. Data created on May 29, 2018. Data last reviewed and updated February 26, 2019.63 years ago
- This data set contains information on the location, type, and fish passage barrier status of road-based stream crossing structures, dams, and miscellaneous instream structures in Washington State. It is a subset of data extracted from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) Fish Passage and Diversion Screening Inventory (FPDSI) database. It includes data compiled from several WDFW and non-WDFW fish passage barrier inventory efforts. The data are statewide in scope but do not represent a comprehensive or complete inventory of fish passage barriers. The data set is updated weekly as inventory efforts are ongoing. Please note that the "Date Updated" value of this item refers to the ArcGIS Online item's date, not the data contained within.23 years ago
- RS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters.The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value.RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.NameDescriptionUnitsRIU_IDUnique identifier for each inventory unit.n/aLAND_COV_CDLand cover code.n/aLAND_COV_NMLand cover name.n/aAGENumber of years since the stand was initiated; a composite of known dates (where recorded in inventory data) and predicted dates (where not recorded in historical inventory data). Calculated as CURRENT YEAR - ORIGIN_YEAR.yearsORIGIN_YEARYear at which a stand was re-initiated, a composite of known dates (where recorded in inventory data) and predicted dates (where not recorded in historical inventory data). Based on the median of raster cell values.yearBAPredicted basal area.square feet / acreBA_4Predicted basal area of trees > 4" DBH.square feet / acreBA_4_CONIFERPredicted basal area of trees > 4" DBH which are of a conifer species.square feet / acreBA_4_HWDPredicted basal area of trees > 4" DBH which are of a hardwood species.square feet / acreBA_6Predicted basal area of trees > 6" DBH.square feet / acreBA_T100Predicted basal area of the 100 largest trees per acre.square feet / acreBAP_HWDPredicted percent of trees which are of a hardwood species.percent (0-100)BFVOL_GROSSPredicted gross board-foot volume. Values do not account for defect deductions.board feet / acreBFVOL_NETPredicted net board-foot volume.board feet / acreBIOMASS_ALLPredicted above-ground biomass (live and dead).metric tonnes / acBIOMASS_LIVEPredicted above-ground biomass (live).metric tonnes / acCANOPY_LAYERSPredicted count of distinct canopy layers. Units are continuous despite measurements being ordinal.countCARBON_ALLPredicted above-ground carbon (live and dead).metric tonnes / acCARBON_LIVEPredicted above-ground carbon (live).metric tonnes / acCFVOL_DDWMPredicted cubic foot volume of down and dead woody materials.cubic feet / acreCFVOL_TOTALPredicted total cubic-foot volume. This value does not account for merchantability or defect.cubic feet / acreCLOSUREPredicted canopy closure.percent (0-100)COVERPredicted canopy cover.percent (0-100)HT_LOREYPredicted Lorey height. Lorey height is basal-area weighted mean height.feetHT_T40Predicted height of the 40 largest trees per acre.feetHT_T100Predicted mean height of the 100 largest trees per acre.feetHTMAXPredicted maximum tree height.feetQMDPredicted quadratic mean diameter.inchesQMD_6Predicted quadratic mean diameter for trees > 6" DBH.inchesQMD_T100Predicted quadratic mean diameter for top 100 trees per acre.inchesRDPredicted Curtis relative density (RD)unitlessRD_6Predicted Curtis relative density (RD) for trees > 6" DBHunitlessRD_SUMPredicted Curtis relative density (RD), summation methodunitlessSDI_SUMPredicted Reineke's Stand Density Index (SDI), summation methodtrees / acreSDI_SUM_4Predicted Reineke's Stand Density Index (SDI), summation method, for trees > 4" DBH.trees / acreSDI_DF_EModeled maximum stand density index, Douglas-fir, eastern WA. 10" qmd.trees / acreSDI_GF_EModeled maximum stand density index, Grand-fir, eastern WA. 10" qmd.trees / acreSDI_LP_EModeled maximum stand density index, Lodgepole pine, eastern WA. 10" qmd.trees / acreSDI_PP_EModeled maximum stand density index, Ponderosa pine, eastern WA. 10" qmd.trees / acreSDI_WL_EModeled maximum stand density index,Western larch, eastern WA. 10" qmd.trees / acreSDI_DF_WModeled maximum stand density index, Douglas-fir, western WA. 10" qmd.trees / acreSDI_WH_WModeled maximum stand density index, Western hemlock, western WA. 10" qmd.trees / acreSNAG_ACRE_15Predicted number of snags per acre > 15" DBH.count / acreSNAG_ACRE_20Predicted number of snags per acre > 20" DBH.count / acreSNAG_ACRE_21Predicted number of snags per acre > 21" DBH.count / acreSNAG_ACRE_30Predicted number of snags per acre > 30" DBH.count / acreSPECIES1Primary speciesn/aSPECIES2Secondary speciesn/aTREE_ACREPredicted number of trees per acre.count / acreTREE_ACRE_4Predicted number of trees per acre > 4" DBH.count / acreTREE_ACRE_4_CONIFERPredicted number of trees per acre > 4" DBH which are conifer.count / acreTREE_ACRE_6Predicted number of trees per acre > 6" DBH.count / acreTREE_ACRE_8Predicted number of trees per acre > 8" DBH.count / acreTREE_ACRE_11Predicted number of trees per acre > 11" DBH.count / acreTREE_ACRE_20Predicted number of trees per acre > 20" DBH.count / acreTREE_ACRE_21Predicted number of trees per acre > 21" DBH.count / acreTREE_ACRE_30Predicted number of trees per acre > 30" DBH.count / acreTREE_ACRE_31Predicted number of trees per acre > 31" DBH.count / acreRS_COVEREDDescription of the extent of RS-FRIS raster coverage within inventory unit (NONE, PARTIAL, or FULL).n/aRS_COVERED_PCTPercent (0 to 100) of the inventory unit with RS-FRIS raster coverage.percent (0-100)RS_FRIS_POLY_ACRESAcres of RS-FRIS polygon.acres83 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.This evolutionarily significant unit, or ESU, includes all naturally spawned populations of Chinook salmon from rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound, including the Strait of Juan De Fuca from the Elwha River, eastward, including rivers and streams flowing into Hood Canal, South Sound, North Sound and the Strait of Georgia in Washington, and 26 artificial propagation programs.63 years ago
- Data was created, verified, or obtained from WSDA, USDA and outside entities such as Conservation Districts and managed with editable feature services. This dataset contains crop data collected and stored for Washington as of 12/31/2022. It consists of polygons representing individual crop field borders with attributes including crop, irrigation, TRS, county, source, and acres. Attributes are updated by WSDA staff via ground surveys or by using outside sources such as USDA's NASS Cropland Data Layer. Outside resources are used whenever possible, such as obtaining data from producers, enlisting resources from Conservation Districts, etc. This land use data is published annually as a file geodatabase but due to limited resources, the entire state is not updated each year. WSDA strives to maintain a minimum 4 year refresh schedule, with a target goal of every 2 or 3 years, especially in the irrigated agricultural basins. For this reason, the data is not statistical, but provides an accurate agricultural snapshot in time for each geographic area. WSDA partners with USDA NASS and provides mapping data for the Cropland Data Layer satellite project, especially in areas not well served by USDA FSA data. 23 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.This evolutionarily significant unit, or ESU, includes all naturally spawned populations of Chinook salmon from rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound, including the Strait of Juan De Fuca from the Elwha River, eastward, including rivers and streams flowing into Hood Canal, South Sound, North Sound and the Strait of Georgia in Washington, and 26 artificial propagation programs.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.This evolutionarily significant unit, or ESU, includes all naturally spawned populations of Chinook salmon from rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound, including the Strait of Juan De Fuca from the Elwha River, eastward, including rivers and streams flowing into Hood Canal, South Sound, North Sound and the Strait of Georgia in Washington, and 26 artificial propagation programs.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.This evolutionarily significant unit, or ESU, includes all naturally spawned populations of Chinook salmon from rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound, including the Strait of Juan De Fuca from the Elwha River, eastward, including rivers and streams flowing into Hood Canal, South Sound, North Sound and the Strait of Georgia in Washington, and 26 artificial propagation programs.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, two species of chum salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover chum by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, two species of chum salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover chum by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, four species of coho salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover coho by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, four species of coho salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover coho by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, four species of coho salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover coho by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, two species of sockeye salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover sockeye by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, two species of sockeye salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover sockeye by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, two species of sockeye salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover sockeye by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, 11 species of steelhead are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover steelhead by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, 11 species of steelhead are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover steelhead by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, 11 species of steelhead are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover steelhead by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.63 years ago
- Estimates of persons with disabilities or other support needs by Census tract in Washington State. DSHS prepared estimates of persons with disabilities or other support needs in Washington Census tracts using data from the US Census Bureau’s 2012 American Community Survey. The estimates were prepared for DSHS and the Washington Department of Health to assist in emergency preparedness planning for Washington jurisdictions. Only 5-year estimates (2008-2012) are available for Census tracts. Estimated counts, percentages, margins of error (MOEs) of counts and percentages by Census tract have been calculated for the following characteristics: Persons with Disabilities, Hearing Difficulty, Vision Difficulty, Cognitive Difficulty, Ambulatory Difficulty, Self-Care Difficulty, Independent Living Difficulty, Persons with Two or More Disabilities, Persons with Disabilities and in Poverty, Persons in Groups Quarters, Households Without Vehicles, Persons Speaking English less than "Very Well," Persons in Poverty.Lifecycle status: ProductionPurpose: enable open access to DSHS dataDSHS Data Security: Category 1 - PublicLast Update: 4/24/2015Update Cycle: As neededFGDC Metadata - For Layer: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_EstimatesbyCensusTract.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Adult Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_AdultEstimates.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Senior Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_SeniorEstimates.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Youth Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_YouthEstimates.xmlImportant: DSHS reserves the right to alter, suspend, re-host, or retire this service at any time and without notice. This is a map service that you can use in custom web applications and software products. Your use of this map service in these types of tools forms a dependency on the service definition (available fields, layers, etc.). If you form any dependency on this service, be aware of this significant risk to your purposes. You might consider mitigating your risk by extracting the source data and using it to host your own service in an environment under your control. Typically, DSHS Enterprise GIS staff will provide notification of changes via the Comments RSS capability in ArcGIS Online. You may subscribe to the RSS feed that publishes comments to monitor any planned and notified changes.23 years ago
- Government Land Office maps (GLOs) are a result of the effort to survey all United States public lands before settlement. Starting in 1812 land was divided into square six mile blocks called townships, then subdivided into sections and ranges. Each subdivided area was surveyed and given its own map or GLO. During this process surveyors were required to indicate cultural resources such as roads and Indian trails and standardized symbols were used to represent geographic features. These GLOs are now maintained by the Bureau of Land Management as part of the official Land Status and Cadastral Survey records. As land was divided into parcels of individual ownership additional cadastral survey maps were created over time. For this reason there are often multiple GLOs or "cadastral survey maps" for one township / range, generally numbered one through four. For this seamless GLO layer, DAHP focused solely on the more historical GLOs which were usually listed as image number one or two for that specific township / range in the BLM Cadastral Survey records. In some cases no GLOs were available for review. Such areas included National Forest Lands, National Parks, Indian Reservations, and remote wilderness areas.63 years ago
- As established by WAC 222-22-020, the state is divided into areas known as watershed administrative units (WAUs). WAU boundaries are defined by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in cooperation with the departments of Ecology, Fish and Wildlife, affected Indian tribes, local governments, forest land owners, and the public. This dataset is intended for use at 1:24,000 scale. WAU's are used by the Timber/Fish/Wildlife cooperators as the boundaries for watershed analysis studies and other natural resources management purposes on state and privately owned lands. WAU represents the administrative boundaries of 846 units. The boundaries are mainly along drainage divides (ridges), with some along rivers and other Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) management boundaries. In the forested areas of the state WAUs range in size from 3,822 to 297,614 acres with a mean of 40,187 acres and a standard deviation of 26,697 acres. On the Columbia Plateau WAU areas range in size from 35,098 to 1,765,555 acres. This version of the WAU boundaries is current as of April 2006. Administrative boundaries based on hydrology form a general hierarchy. Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIAs) are the largest unit, BASINs are subunits of WRIAs, and WAUs are subunits of BASINs. However, boundaries in this hierarchy do not necessarliy match in all areas. Where watershed analysis was been conducted, WAU boundaries may cross WRIA lines. Do not use WAU to derive WRIA boundaries. WRIA is managed and maintained by the Washington Department of Ecology.93 years ago
- Digital aerial imagery for Washington state was collected by Hexagon as part of the 2020 NAIP Imaging Program. Imagery was collected between August 3, 2020 and September 6, 2020 using Leica ADS100 digital camera systems. The project was flown at heights ranging from 8,000 ft msl to 15,500 ft msl resulting in a nominal GSD of 20cm. Four band images were collected to support both 3-band natural color (RGB) and false color infrared (FCIR) orthoimage products. Aerotriangulation and orthorectification were done with the Leica Xpro software package, version 6.4 and ortho mosaics were created with Inpho Orthovista 8.0. 4-band RGBN 8-bit Ortho images were created in a DOQQ tiling scheme. Products are in the UTM map projection, NAD83 (2011) datum, in meters.63 years ago
- Abstract:Rain on Snow is a statewide coverage of rain-on-snow zones. Rain-on-snow zones are based on average amounts of snow on the ground in early January, relative to the amount of snow that could reasonably be melted during a model storm event. Five Rain on Snow zones are defined in Washington State and are based on climate, elevation, latitude, and vegetation. Rain on Snow was digitized from 1:250,000 USGS quads.Purpose:The Rain-on-snow coverage was created as a screening tool to identify forest practice applications that may be in a significant rain-on-snow zone (WAC 222-22-100).Description:Five ROS zones are defined in Washington State and are based on climate, elevation, latitude, and vegetation. Rain on snow is a process that exhibits spatial and temporal variation under natural conditions, with the effects of vegetation on snow accumulation and melt adding additional complications in prediction. There is no map that shows the magnitude and frequency of water inputs to be expected from rain on snow events, so we have attempted to create an index map based on what we know about the process controls and their effects in the various climatic zones. If we assume that, averaged over many years, the seasonal storm tracks that bring warm, wet cyclonic storms to the Northwest have access to all parts of Washington , then the main factors controlling and/or reflecting the occurrence and magnitude of a R/S event in any particular place are: 1) Climatic region: especially the differences between windward and leeward sides of major mountain ranges, which control seasonal climatic patterns;2) Elevation: controls temperature, thus the likelihood and amount of snow on the ground, and affects orographic enhancement of storm precipitation; 3) Latitude: affects temperature, thus snow;4) Aspect: affects insolation and temperature (especially in winter), thus melting of snow; 5) Vegetation: the species composing forest communities can reflect the climate of an area (tolerance of warmth or cold, wet or dry conditions, deep and/or long lived snowpacks); the height and density of vegetation also partly controls the amount of snow on the ground. As natural vegetation integrates the effects of all of these controls, we tried to find or adapt floral indicators of the various zones of water input. We designed the precipitation zones to reflect the amount of snow likely to be on the ground at the beginning of a storm. We assumed that some middle elevation area would experience the greatest water input due to Rain on Snow, because the amount of snow available would be likely to be approximately the amount that could be melted. Higher and lower elevation zones would bear diminished effects, but for opposite reasons (no snow to melt, vs too cold to melt much). These considerations suggested a three or five zone system. We chose to designate five zones because a larger number of classes reduces the importance of the dividing lines, and thus of the inherent uncertainties of those lines. The average snow water equivalents (SWE) for the early January measurements at about 100 snow courses and snow pillows were compiled; snow depths for the first week in January at about 85 weather stations were converted into SWE. For each region (western North Cascades, Blue Mountains, etc.), the snow amounts were sorted by station elevation to derive a rough indicator of the relationship between snow accumulation and elevation. (Sub regional differences in snow accumulation patterns were also recognized.) After trying various combinations of ratios for areas where the snow hydrology is relatively well known, we adopted the following designations: 5. Highlands: >4 5 times ideal SWE; high elevation, with little likelihood of significant water input to the ground during storms (precipitation likely to be snow, and liquid water probably refreezes in a deep snow pack); effects of harvest on snow accumulation are minor; 4. Snow dominated zone: from "1.25 1.5 ideal SWE, up to "4; melt occurs during R/S (especially during early season storms), but effects can be mitigated by the lag time of percolation through the snowpack; 3. Peak rain on snow zone: "0.5 0.75 up to "1.25 ideal SWE; middle elevations: shallow snow packs are common in winter, so likelihood and effects of R/S in heavy rainstorms are greatest; typically more snow accumulation in clearings than in forest; 2. Rain dominated zone: "0.1 0.5 ideal SWE; areas at lower elevations, where rain occasionally falls on small amounts of snow; 1. Lowlands: <0.1 ideal SWE; coastal, low elevation, and rain shadow areas; lower rainfall intensities, and significant snow depths are rare. Precipitation zones were mapped on mylar overlays on 1:250,000 scale topographic maps. Because snow depth is affected by many factors, the correlation between snow and elevation is crude, and it was not possible to simply pick out contour markers for the boundaries. Ranges of elevations were chosen for each region, but allowance was made for the effects of sub regional climates, aspect, vegetative indicators of snow depth, etc. Thus, a particular boundary would be mapped somewhat lower on the north side of a ridge or in a cool valley (e.g. below a glacier), reflecting greater snow accumulations in such places. The same boundary would be mapped higher on the south side of the ridge, where inter-storm sunshine could reduce snow accumulation. Conditions at the weather stations and snow courses were used to check the mapping; but in areas where measurements are scarce, interpolation had to be performed. The boundaries of the precipitation zones were entered in the DNR's GIS. Because of the small scale of the original mapping and the imprecision of the digitizing process, some errors were introduced. It should not be expected that GIS images can be projected to large scales to define knife edge zone boundaries (which don't exist, anyway), but they are good enough to locate areas tens of acres in size. Some apparent anomalies in the map require explanation. Much of western Washington is mapped in the lowland or highland zones. This does not mean that R/S does not occur in those areas; it does, but on average with less frequency and hydrologic significance than in the middle three zones. Most of central and eastern Washington is mapped in the rain dominated zone, despite meager precipitation there; this means only that the amount of snow likely to be on the ground is small, and storm water inputs are composed dominantly of the rain itself, without much contribution from snow melt. Much of northeastern Washington is mapped in the peak Rain Snow zone, despite the fact that such events are less common there than in western Washington. This is due to the fact that there is less increase in snow depth with elevation (i.e. the snow wedge is less steep), so a wider elevation band has appropriate snow amounts; plus, much of that region lies within that elevation band where the 'ideal' amount of snow is liable to be on the ground when a model Rain Snow event occurs. This does not reflect the lower frequency of such storms in that area.93 years ago
- This map displays Interstate exit ramp location information. Points are placed at the beginning of exit ramps on Interstate routes in Washington and provide information about the road the ramp exits from and the road it exits to in addition to the exit number where available.You can download the data presented in this map from the WSDOT Open Data Portal.If you have any questions about this application, please email OnlineMapSupport@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- Ambient monitoring measures the status of air quality throughout the state to assess trends, compliance with federal and state air quality standards, effectiveness of control strategies and attainment plans, health effects and environmental damage; respond to citizen complaints; evaluate specific geographic or hot-spot air quality concerns; and create environmental indicators. Emission inventory is the cataloging of sources of air pollution and the emissions from those sources. Inventory data are critical to the understanding of the causes of air pollution problems and creation of appropriate solutions. Meteorological forecasting and dispersion modeling of air pollutants are essential to understanding the movement and buildup of air pollution; the carrying capacity of airsheds; the interaction of pollutants; and the location of maximum impact of sources of pollution. As of September 26, 2005 there are no longer any areas of Washington designated as "NONATTAINMENT."63 years ago
- This map shows the general pattern of arsenic contamination from Ruston (Tacoma Smelter Plume) By Census Block Group. With 90% certainty, at least 1 in 10 parcels will have soil arsenic at or above levels shown. Predictions are based on distance and direction from the former Asarco smelter, and on sampling data from forested and other soils undisturbed by development. Actual arsenic levels may vary greatly from parcel to parcel.Disclaimer: Actual arsenic levels may vary greatly from parcel to parcel. Property-specific sampling is necessary to determine the actual amount of arsenic on a given property. How to Sample your own soil - https://ecology.wa.gov/Spills-Cleanup/Contamination-cleanup/Dirt-Alert-program/Soil-samplingPattern and Description of the Tacoma Smelter Plume:There are three major factors to Arsenic deposition (the three D's) but many others exist. 'D'irection- wind rose direction,'D'istance, 'D'isturbanceArsenic tends to exceed state cleanup levels more often than other metals. Lead is the other main contaminant.Arsenic and lead are found mainly in the top six inches of soil.In areas where soil has been moved or turned over, contamination can be deeper.Undisturbed areas, such as forests, tend to have higher levels of contamination.In general, levels are related to distance and direction from the former smelter. Levels decrease with distance and are higher along the dominant north-northeast and south-southwest wind directions.Created a dataset for arsenic(0 to 6 inches sample depth) that had similar study characteristics in the field and lab. Various environmental studies were reviewed because of the size of the study area. Ecology reviewed data from over 130 studies and found 23 studies that had applicable data. Theses studies contained over 22,500 disturbed-residential samples and 1469 undisturbed samples for our analysis.23 years ago
- Points on streams and rivers where SMA jurisdiction begins as published in Chapter 173-18 WAC. This layer will not be updated. It is slowly becoming outdated as cities and counties update their list of SMA streams in their shoreline master program. See WAC 173-18-044 posted at http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=173-18-044.Point locations were originally compiled for Ecology in 1972 by the US Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Tacoma, WA, and released in STREAMS OF WASHINGTON UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971. Points were determined using multiple-regression techniques based on streamflow and basin precipitation records. Ecology has occasionally updated point locations, and added and subtracted points since 1972.23 years ago
- Automated hydrograph separation techniques were used to evaluate the groundwater contribution to total streamflow (baseflow) at active and inactive stream gauging stations throughout Washington State. Discharge records for 582 gauging stations, with at least three complete water years of daily mean streamflow data, were downloaded from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Information System. Station characteristics were compiled for each gauge, including period of streamflow record, type and degree of regulation affecting the gauge, watershed drainage area, USGS station number, station name, and gauge location. Summary statistics were calculated for annual mean streamflow and annual 7-day low flow for all 582 stations. Monthly, and in some cases annual, statistics for baseflow were then estimated using a USGS hydrograph separation software program called HYSEP (Sloto and Crouse, 1996) for those stations judged to be free of significant snowmelt or regulation effects.63 years ago
- The Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) defines designated areas as areas expected to have 24-hour PM2.5 design values exceeding Ecology's healthy air goal of 20 µg/m^3. The form of the PM2.5 design value is the 3-year average of the annual 98th percentile 24-hour average concentrations. These areas were identified using a combination of model output from the Air Indicator Report for Public Awareness and Community Tracking (AIRPACT-4) forecast model and measured PM2.5 concentrations at monitoring sites operated by Ecology and its partner agencies. All input datasets cover the time period July 2014 – June 2017, which was the most recent continuous 3-year period available with minimal wildfire influence. Wildfire data were not removed completely from the dataset; rather, data were chosen and filtered to minimize the influence of wildfires due to inconsistent model performance and extreme outliers during wildfire periods.Design values were interpolated using the following steps:Median daily AIRPACT-4 forecast PM2.5 concentrations were extracted at 4km grid cell centroids.The ratio between the measured 98th percentile PM2.5 concentration (as a surrogate for the 24-hour design value) and the nearest grid cell's median daily AIRPACT-4 forecast PM2.5 concentration was calculated for each monitoring site.The ratios were interpolated across the domain at 4km resolution using Empirical Bayesian Kriging.Interpolated ratios were multiplied by median daily AIRPACT-4 forecast PM2.5 concentrations to yield interpolated PM2.5 design values.Grid cells with design values above Ecology's healthy air goal of 20 µg/m^3 were extracted and dissolved into smoothed polygons. Only polygons with ≥3 contiguous grid cells were retained due to model uncertainty in small areas.Polygons were overlaid with city, census-designated place, and urban growth area boundaries from 2020 Census TIGER/Line files. Where polygons intersected with any of the above census-defined boundaries, the largest of the intersecting boundaries defines the designated area.Ecology plans to update the designated areas layer at least every five years in conjunction with its 5-year Ambient Air Monitoring Network Assessment.63 years ago
- AbstractThe basin delineation was initially derived using standard watershed tools and DEM's (from NOAA). The computer generated watershed boundary was then manually edited via visual interpretation using topo maps, the DEM files and other watershed boundary maps (notably from the Sea Doc Society). The majority of the editing was in smoothing the original watershed boundary as the auto generated basin was far too detailed for the scale of the map. The smoothing process also removed the ‘raster’ artifacts. For the Salish Sea map the intent was just to show the general boundary as a smooth line that visually follows the topography. Again, the emphasis was for an easy to understand cartographic representation of the basin at a fairly coarse scale, not for exact hydrologic analysis.PurposeFor the purposes of this map & dataset, the Salish Sea was defined as including: Puget Sound, Desolation Sound (note, some BC definitions exclude Desolation Sound), Strait of Juan de Fuca (to the mouth of the Pacific Ocean), Strait of Georgia (which I defined as extending to Johnstone Strait). The Salish Sea polygon and corresponding Basin boundary files were derived for use at approximately 1:1,500,000 (e.g., Salish Sea Map, 2009, http://staff.wwu.edu/stefan/SalishSea.htm).Data creditStefan Freelan, 2009 stefan@wwu.edu 360-650-2949Institute for Spatial Information and AnalysisHuxley College of the Environment, Western Washington UniversityBellingham, WA 98225-9085http://staff.wwu.edu/stefan/SalishSea.htm63 years ago
- Washington State county boundaries from Washington Department of Natural Resources. Acres of distribution calculated from following maps published by the Washington State Department of Agriculture in 2011: Knotweed, Bohemian, “Polygonum bohemicum” Distribution 2011. Giant, “Polygonum sachalinense” Distribution 2011. Himalayan, “Polygonum polystachyum” Distribution 2011. Knotweed, Japanese, “Polygonum cuspidatum” Distribution 2011. PRISM projects extracted from PRISM website Project Search @ https://secure.rco.wa.gov/PRISM/search/ProjectSearch.aspx in 2015.63 years ago
- This dataset shows the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe as defined by WDFW’s Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) program. It shows where WDFW recommends counties and cities require site-specific information be gathered to inform site-scale land use decisions. It is not designed to directly inform parcel-scale land use decisions, rather it is designed to be used as a flagging tool. As such, if this dataset errs, it is more likely to over-identify shrubsteppe and eastside steppe than under-identify. It is “best available science” regarding the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe in Washington.23 years ago
- This dataset shows the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe as defined by WDFW’s Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) program. It shows where WDFW recommends counties and cities require site-specific information be gathered to inform site-scale land use decisions. It is not designed to directly inform parcel-scale land use decisions, rather it is designed to be used as a flagging tool. As such, if this dataset errs, it is more likely to over-identify shrubsteppe and eastside steppe than under-identify. It is “best available science” regarding the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe in Washington.<o:p></o:p>23 years ago
- This dataset shows the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe as defined by WDFW’s Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) program. It shows where WDFW recommends counties and cities require site-specific information be gathered to inform site-scale land use decisions. It is not designed to directly inform parcel-scale land use decisions, rather it is designed to be used as a flagging tool. As such, if this dataset errs, it is more likely to over-identify shrubsteppe and eastside steppe than under-identify. It is “best available science” regarding the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe in Washington.<o:p></o:p>23 years ago
- This dataset shows the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe as defined by WDFW’s Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) program. It shows where WDFW recommends counties and cities require site-specific information be gathered to inform site-scale land use decisions. It is not designed to directly inform parcel-scale land use decisions, rather it is designed to be used as a flagging tool. As such, if this dataset errs, it is more likely to over-identify shrubsteppe and eastside steppe than under-identify. It is “best available science” regarding the general location of shrubsteppe and eastside steppe in Washington.<o:p></o:p>23 years ago
- This layer represents the overall ranking for Environmental Exposures, Environmental Effects, Socioeconomic Factors and Sensitive Populations. More information is available here https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtnibl/WTNIBL/.63 years ago
- This layer represents the number and percent of housing units built before 1980, including single homes and multiple residence units such as apartments. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=72263 years ago
- This layer represents the transportation costs based on percentage of income for the regional moderate household. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=86263 years ago
- This layer represents a sum of all race/ethnicity categories EXCEPT White/Non-Hispanic, this includes: Black, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian-Other Pacific Islander, Two or more races and the ethnicity grouping of "Spanish/Hispanic/Latino". A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=470763 years ago
- This layer represents toxicity-weighted concentration in stream reach segments within 500 meters of a block centroid, divided by distance in meters, presented as the population-weighted average of blocks in each block group. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=472863 years ago
- This layer represents the number of live born singleton (one baby) infants born at term (at or above 37 completed weeks of gestation) with a birth weight of less than 2,500 grams (about 5.5 lbs.). A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=37263 years ago
- This app is to showcase the avalanche paths from this map. This is an experience builder designed to be a user-friendly guide to navigate the different avalanche paths in Washington State.The Avalanche paths dataset in this map is a work-in-progress that's updated on an as needed basis. If you have any questions or comments regarding this map or data please contact HQMaintenanceTechnologyGroup@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) developed this data set in fulfillment of a grant from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to test a conceptual climate risk assessment model developed for transportation infrastructure. WSDOT applied the model using scenario planning in a series of statewide workshops, using local experts, to create qualitative assessment of climate vulnerability on its assets in each region and mode across Washington. For the purposes of this statewide effort, managed assets were defined as sections of highway or railroad, and whole facilities (Ferry Terminal or Airport). Fourteen workshops engaged experts across all WSDOT regions, state ferries, rail, and aviation. The outcome of each workshop was a subjective evaluation of asset vulnerability agreed upon by participants. This feature class contains the results for airports. This study assumed 100% probability of climate change impacts previously identified in the University of Washington Climate Impacts Group's 2009 assessment. Types of impacts discussed in the workshops with local experts included: temperature changes, increase in extreme weather events, precipitation changes, sea level rise, fire risk, and high winds. The scientific community's understanding of climate impacts continues to evolve as the models and collective understanding of feedback systems improve. We do not have perfect information about exactly how, when, where, and to what magnitude climate changes will unfold in Washington State. After reviewing the extreme weather events and other impacts projected for their area, workshop participants defined sections of highway, rail, or specific facilities with consideration of the local geology, natural and constructed drainage and hydrology, elevation, slope, land use and operational maintenance issues. Once defined, each corridor or facility was then ranked for two variables: asset criticality and potential impact. Asset criticality (which was defined by the workshop participants) should not be confused with other measures such as highway functional class. 1) How critical is that site or corridor to overall transportation operations and public safety? The following scale guided the qualitative assessment of criticality: a. 1-3 = Low - facility/corridor with low daily traffic, available alternate routes, not part of the National Highway System b. 4-6 = Medium - facility/corridor has low to medium daily traffic, serves as an alternate route of other state corridors or facilities c. 7-10 = High - facility/corridor is an Interstate or other major highway, is considered a lifeline route or is the sole access to a population center or critical facility. 2) How might potential climate changes impact site or corridor operations? The following scale guided the assessment of climate impacts: a. 1-3 = Low - Reduced Capacity: facility/corridor partially open to use and full operations can be restored within 10 days b. 4-6 = Medium - Temporary Operational Failure: Facility/corridor closed for hours or days. Reopening or repair could be completed within 60 days. c. 7-10 = High - Complete Failure: facility/corridor likely to require major repair or rebuild with closures lasting more than 60 days These qualitative rankings for impacts and asset criticality and some general descriptions were captured in spreadsheets that were later used to create GIS layers. This data is intended for use in statewide or regional planning and to assist in adapting maintenance and engineering policies and practices to protect our transportation infrastructure over the coming decades. The rankings here were based on our knowledge and understanding at the time of the study, and should only be taken as a best professional estimate for considering potential conditions that might put people or infrastructure at risk. Current information about projected climate changes and asset use and condition should always be taken into account, especially as time progresses.83 years ago
- The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) developed this data set in fulfillment of a grant from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to test a conceptual climate risk assessment model developed for transportation infrastructure. WSDOT applied the model using scenario planning in a series of statewide workshops, using local experts, to create qualitative assessment of climate vulnerability on its assets in each region and mode across Washington. For the purposes of this statewide effort, managed assets were defined as sections of highway or railroad, and whole facilities (Ferry Terminal or Airport). Fourteen workshops engaged experts across all WSDOT regions, state ferries, rail, and aviation. The outcome of each workshop was a subjective evaluation of asset vulnerability agreed upon by participants. This feature class contains the results for state routes. This study assumed 100% probability of climate change impacts previously identified in the University of Washington Climate Impacts Group's 2009 assessment. Types of impacts discussed in the workshops with local experts included: temperature changes, increase in extreme weather events, precipitation changes, sea level rise, fire risk, and high winds. The scientific community's understanding of climate impacts continues to evolve as the models and collective understanding of feedback systems improve. We do not have perfect information about exactly how, when, where, and to what magnitude climate changes will unfold in Washington State. After reviewing the extreme weather events and other impacts projected for their area, workshop participants defined sections of highway, rail, or specific facilities with consideration of the local geology, natural and constructed drainage and hydrology, elevation, slope, land use and operational maintenance issues. Once defined, each corridor or facility was then ranked for two variables: asset criticality and potential impact. Asset criticality (which was defined by the workshop participants) should not be confused with other measures such as highway functional class. 1) How critical is that site or corridor to overall transportation operations and public safety? The following scale guided the qualitative assessment of criticality: a. 1-3 = Low - facility/corridor with low daily traffic, available alternate routes, not part of the National Highway System b. 4-6 = Medium - facility/corridor has low to medium daily traffic, serves as an alternate route of other state corridors or facilities c. 7-10 = High - facility/corridor is an Interstate or other major highway, is considered a lifeline route or is the sole access to a population center or critical facility. 2) How might potential climate changes impact site or corridor operations? The following scale guided the assessment of climate impacts: a. 1-3 = Low - Reduced Capacity: facility/corridor partially open to use and full operations can be restored within 10 days b. 4-6 = Medium - Temporary Operational Failure: Facility/corridor closed for hours or days. Reopening or repair could be completed within 60 days. c. 7-10 = High - Complete Failure: facility/corridor likely to require major repair or rebuild with closures lasting more than 60 days These qualitative rankings for impacts and asset criticality and some general descriptions were captured in spreadsheets that were later used to create GIS layers. This data is intended for use in statewide or regional planning and to assist in adapting maintenance and engineering policies and practices to protect our transportation infrastructure over the coming decades. The rankings here were based on our knowledge and understanding at the time of the study, and should only be taken as a best professional estimate for considering potential conditions that might put people or infrastructure at risk. Current information about projected climate changes and asset use and condition should always be taken into account, especially as time progresses.83 years ago
- Wildlife Barrier Fencing consists of lines that describe the characteristics of wildlife fences installed along state highways. Wildlife Barrier Fencing is part of habitat connectivity infrastructure that enables wildlife to safely cross highways or prevent wildlife-vehicle collisions. Wildlife fences are installed to prevent wildlife from crossing highways at grade and may also direct the movement of wildlife to structures, such as bridges and culverts, where highways can be crossed safely. The fence line segments in the dataset also have links to additional information such as pictures of the fence and construction plan sheets.83 years ago
- WSDOT sets level of service (LOS) standards for state highways and ferry routes of statewide significance (HSS) based on RCW 47.06.140(2). Regional transportation planning organizations (RTPOs) and WSDOT jointly develop and RTPOs establish LOS standards for regionally significant state highways and ferry routes (non-HSS) based on RCW 47.80.030(1)(c). LOS is based on peak-hour except where noted. Level of Service Standard is used by planners to determine the effectiveness of a roadway network. LOS assigns a rank (A - F) to road sections based on traffic flow and corresponding safe driving conditions. The Highway Capacity Manual and AASHTO Geometric Design of Highways and Streets ("Green Book") list the following levels of service: A = Free flow, B = Reasonably free flow, C = Stable flow, D = Approaching unstable flow, E = Unstable flow, E Mitigated = Congestion should be mitigated (such as transit) when p.m. peak hour LOS falls below LOS "E", F = Forced or breakdown flow This dataset is used as a general reference layer for geographic information systems at the Washington State Department of Transportation, and is updated as needed.83 years ago
- The Washington State Freight and Goods Transportation System (FGTS) classifies freight corridors by modes in Washington state based on annual freight tonnage moved, including truck, rail, and waterway freight corridors. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) designates and updates the FGTS every two years. This dataset shows the truck freight corridors classified under FGTS system, including state highways, ferry routes, city streets, and county roads. Two other datasets are also available and published for FGTS system, including Freight and Goods Transportation System of Washington – Rail Corridors, and Freight and Goods Transportation System of Washington – Waterway Corridors.83 years ago
- Due to the dynamic and diverse nature of winter weather and resultant road conditions, WSDOT maintenance personnel use a variety of methods and materials to help prevent snow and ice formation on state highways. Outcomes of snow and ice control treatments will vary, dependent upon severity of winter weather events, topography, traffic levels and speeds, and proximity to support facilities (i.e. liquid chemical storage tanks and salt stockpiles). While outcomes can be measured in a variety of ways, the motoring public most often measures maintenance efforts in terms of road conditions during and immediately after winter weather events. Maintenance personnel also rate roadway conditions during the winter season. This information is used to project expected road conditions associated with snow and ice treatment levels for different events. The unique nature of individual winter weather events limits the relevance of projected expectations on a given storm, but when ratings from an entire winter season are averaged, they become a good indicator of the Level of Service (LOS) provided by maintenance personnel over the entire season. Winter climates differ greatly between Eastern and Western Washington, so road treatment levels may vary on either side of the Cascades to match the ability to respond to those conditions. Limited funding also requires prioritization of roads for snow and ice control, so that different levels of service will be employed for individual roads and sections of roads83 years ago
- The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) developed this data set in fulfillment of a grant from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to test a conceptual climate risk assessment model developed for transportation infrastructure. WSDOT applied the model using scenario planning in a series of statewide workshops, using local experts, to create qualitative assessment of climate vulnerability on its assets in each region and mode across Washington. For the purposes of this statewide effort, managed assets were defined as sections of highway or railroad, and whole facilities (Ferry Terminal or Airport). Fourteen workshops engaged experts across all WSDOT regions, state ferries, rail, and aviation. The outcome of each workshop was a subjective evaluation of asset vulnerability agreed upon by participants. This feature class contains the results for WSDOT facilities. This study assumed 100% probability of climate change impacts previously identified in the University of Washington Climate Impacts Group's 2009 assessment. Types of impacts discussed in the workshops with local experts included: temperature changes, increase in extreme weather events, precipitation changes, sea level rise, fire risk, and high winds. The scientific community's understanding of climate impacts continues to evolve as the models and collective understanding of feedback systems improve. We do not have perfect information about exactly how, when, where, and to what magnitude climate changes will unfold in Washington State. After reviewing the extreme weather events and other impacts projected for their area, workshop participants defined sections of highway, rail, or specific facilities with consideration of the local geology, natural and constructed drainage and hydrology, elevation, slope, land use and operational maintenance issues. Once defined, each corridor or facility was then ranked for two variables: asset criticality and potential impact. Asset criticality (which was defined by the workshop participants) should not be confused with other measures such as highway functional class. Descriptions of potential impacts to the WSDOT facilities in this feature class were not rated for impact or criticality. 1) How critical is that site or corridor to overall transportation operations and public safety? The following scale guided the qualitative assessment of criticality: a. 1-3 = Low - facility/corridor with low daily traffic, available alternate routes, not part of the National Highway System b. 4-6 = Medium - facility/corridor has low to medium daily traffic, serves as an alternate route of other state corridors or facilities c. 7-10 = High - facility/corridor is an Interstate or other major highway, is considered a lifeline route or is the sole access to a population center or critical facility. 2) How might potential climate changes impact site or corridor operations? The following scale guided the assessment of climate impacts: a. 1-3 = Low - Reduced Capacity: facility/corridor partially open to use and full operations can be restored within 10 days b. 4-6 = Medium - Temporary Operational Failure: Facility/corridor closed for hours or days. Reopening or repair could be completed within 60 days. c. 7-10 = High - Complete Failure: facility/corridor likely to require major repair or rebuild with closures lasting more than 60 days. These qualitative rankings for impacts and asset criticality and some general descriptions were captured in spreadsheets that were later used to create GIS layers. This data is intended for use in statewide or regional planning and to assist in adapting maintenance and engineering policies and practices to protect our transportation infrastructure over the coming decades. The rankings here were based on our knowledge and understanding at the time of the study, and should only be taken as a best professional estimate for considering potential conditions that might put people or infrastructure at risk. Current information about projected climate changes and asset use and condition should always be taken into account, especially as time progresses.63 years ago
- This dataset is to inform WSDOT and other state agencies of a known invasive species currently found in Washington State waterways. The New Zealand Mud Snail (NZMS) has been identified in a number of locations throughout the state. If in-water work is necessary within water bodies or connecting tributaries within a two-mile radius of the documented location (latitude and longitude), all personal gear (waders, tools, instruments, etc.) and heavy equipment must be fully decontaminated before being used at any other site. Transport to a secure site for cleaning/decontamination is allowed as long as precautions are taken to avoid any dropping of mud or debris between the work site and the cleaning/decontamination location.This dataset is used as a general reference layer for geographic information systems at the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). It is maintained by the WSDOT ESO office. Updates to this dataset are on an as needed basis.83 years ago
- The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) developed this data set in fulfillment of a grant from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to test a conceptual climate risk assessment model developed for transportation infrastructure. WSDOT applied the model using scenario planning in a series of statewide workshops, using local experts, to create qualitative assessment of climate vulnerability on its assets in each region and mode across Washington. For the purposes of this statewide effort, managed assets were defined as sections of highway or railroad, and whole facilities (Ferry Terminal or Airport). Fourteen workshops engaged experts across all WSDOT regions, state ferries, rail, and aviation. The outcome of each workshop was a subjective evaluation of asset vulnerability agreed upon by participants. This feature class contains the results for ferries. This study assumed 100% probability of climate change impacts previously identified in the University of Washington Climate Impacts Group's 2009 assessment. Types of impacts discussed in the workshops with local experts included: temperature changes, increase in extreme weather events, precipitation changes, sea level rise, fire risk, and high winds. The scientific community's understanding of climate impacts continues to evolve as the models and collective understanding of feedback systems improve. We do not have perfect information about exactly how, when, where, and to what magnitude climate changes will unfold in Washington State. After reviewing the extreme weather events and other impacts projected for their area, workshop participants defined sections of highway, rail, or specific facilities with consideration of the local geology, natural and constructed drainage and hydrology, elevation, slope, land use and operational maintenance issues. Once defined, each corridor or facility was then ranked for two variables: asset criticality and potential impact. Asset criticality (which was defined by the workshop participants) should not be confused with other measures such as highway functional class. 1) How critical is that site or corridor to overall transportation operations and public safety? The following scale guided the qualitative assessment of criticality: a. 1-3 = Low - facility/corridor with low daily traffic, available alternate routes, not part of the National Highway System b. 4-6 = Medium - facility/corridor has low to medium daily traffic, serves as an alternate route of other state corridors or facilities c. 7-10 = High - facility/corridor is an Interstate or other major highway, is considered a lifeline route or is the sole access to a population center or critical facility. 2) How might potential climate changes impact site or corridor operations? The following scale guided the assessment of climate impacts: a. 1-3 = Low - Reduced Capacity: facility/corridor partially open to use and full operations can be restored within 10 days b. 4-6 = Medium - Temporary Operational Failure: Facility/corridor closed for hours or days. Reopening or repair could be completed within 60 days. c. 7-10 = High - Complete Failure: facility/corridor likely to require major repair or rebuild with closures lasting more than 60 days. These qualitative rankings for impacts and asset criticality and some general descriptions were captured in spreadsheets that were later used to create GIS layers. This data is intended for use in statewide or regional planning and to assist in adapting maintenance and engineering policies and practices to protect our transportation infrastructure over the coming decades. The rankings here were based on our knowledge and understanding at the time of the study, and should only be taken as a best professional estimate for considering potential conditions that might put people or infrastructure at risk. Current information about projected climate changes and asset use and condition should always be taken into account, especially as time progresses.83 years ago
- Habitat Connectivity Investment Priorities are represented by two completely independent ranks, Ecological Stewardship and Wildlife-related Safety, and a third, Maximum Rank, that is simply the highest value found in Ecological Stewardship and Wildlife-related Safety ranks. These ranks were developed for the state highway system by 1-mile highway segment. The Ecological Stewardship rank reflects a highway segment’s overlap with the ranges of select Endangered or Threatened wildlife and its proximity to connected networks of habitat identified by the Washington Habitat Connectivity Working Group. The listed species selected for inclusion in the ranking process were those species known to be most affected by highways, either due to road mortality or behavioral avoidance or both. Lacking overlap with listed species’ ranges, a base score could still be given to highway segments that overlapped an area of high landscape integrity as identified by the Washington Habitat Connectivity Working Group (WHCWG). If a base score for any of these factors was assigned, rank values were then subject to multipliers for traffic volume and nearby blocks of public land. Highways that carry greater traffic volumes generally have a greater harmful effect on wildlife, both in terms of mortality and the barrier effect caused by behavioral avoidance. Protected lands (many public lands and private lands held in preserves or under protective easements) tend to offer a stable habitat base into the distant future and WSDOT investments in durable infrastructure are more likely to have long term benefits where public lands are present on one or both sides of the highway. The Safety Rank is a reflection of carcass removal and wildlife collision rates or simple overlap with the range of one of Washington’s larger wild animals. Identified carcass removal or collision problem areas were given higher numerical ranks than areas within the ranges of species but without a documented problem. The Maximum Rank is simply the highest of the other two ranks. Rankings updated in January 2018.83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- The term ‘population center’ was defined in the 2021 WSDOT Active Transportation Plan (ATP) to include all city/town or census designated places in Washington State. The WSDOT Population Center dataset combines the WSDOT Incorporated City Limits dataset (May 2021) with the Office of Financial Management’s Census Designated Places (2020 Census) Dataset. Identification of Population Centers was undertaken in order to prioritize active transportation improvements in areas where people congregate and access destinations, and where travel distances between destinations align with typical distances travelled by users of pedestrian and bicycle modes. These areas are a priority because they serve the broadest range of users and potential users of the transportation system, including the very young, very old, and people with disabilities. In this dataset, each Population Center includes information for the “Place Name”, the “Place Type” (city/town or Census Designated Place), and whether or not the Population Center intersects a State Route (“yes” indicates that there is an intersection with a State Route, “no” indicates that there is no intersection.). The dataset will be updated as needed.Please direct questions about the Population Centers dataset to: Brian.D.Wood@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This layer represents the overall ranking for Environmental Exposures, Environmental Effects, Socioeconomic Factors and Sensitive Populations. More information is available here https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtnibl/WTNIBL/.63 years ago
- This layer represents the number and percent of housing units built before 1980, including single homes and multiple residence units such as apartments. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=72263 years ago
- This layer represents the count of sites proposed and listed on the National Priorities List (NPL), directly downloaded from EJSCREEN in 2017. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=472963 years ago
- The WSDOT Public Transportation Division application provides users with online access to information about Washington State park and ride lots in existence as of April 9, 2013. The data contains park and ride lot locations, both GIS coordinated and street addresses, number of parking stalls, utilization rates, and property ownership. Please be advised that: Park and ride lot street address may be approximated. Only park and rides that are reported to WSDOT are included, some might be missing. All missing Park and Rides are unintentional; none have been excluded from this data set. For more information about Park and Ride options, please visit the WSDOT Park & Ride information page.If you have questions about the content of the application, please contact Mark Eldridge, Public Transportation Division - eldridm@wsdot.wa.gov - (360) 705-7273. If you are having trouble viewing the application, please contact our Online Map Support. 23 years ago
- This layer represents the number of live born singleton (one baby) infants born at term (at or above 37 completed weeks of gestation) with a birth weight of less than 2,500 grams (about 5.5 lbs.). A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=37263 years ago
- This layer represents toxicity-weighted concentration in stream reach segments within 500 meters of a block centroid, divided by distance in meters, presented as the population-weighted average of blocks in each block group. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=472863 years ago
- This layer represents a combined ranking of Lead Risk, Proximity to Hazardous Waste Facilities, NPL Sites, Proximity to RMP Facilities and Wastewater Discharge. More information is available here https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtnibl/WTNIBL/.63 years ago
- This layer represents the count of all commercial Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities (TSDF) facilities within 5 km, divided by distance, presented as population-weighted averages of blocks in each census tract. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=472763 years ago
- This layer represents the proximity of facilities with a Risk Management Plan (RMP) by displaying the count of facilities within 5 km of a tract divided by the distance of the facility. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=473063 years ago
- The data represents bike paths along state routes. Most bike paths in this dataset are maintained or owned by WSDOT, but there also may be paths owned or maintained by other entities. Ownership and maintenance information is listed in the “Maintained By” and “Owned By” fields. Any questions can be directed to the Maintenance Technology group at HQMaintenanceTechnologyGroup@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This application displays Access Control classification for all Washington State Highways. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) controls access to the state’s highways (with a few exceptions) in order to preserve the safety and efficiency of these highways as well as the public investment. All Washington State highways are distinguished as being either limited access or managed access highways. Control of access is accomplished by either acquiring rights of access from abutting property owners (limited access control) or by regulating access connections to the highway (managed access control).To learn more about Access Control in Washington State, please visit the WSDOT Highway Access Control and Hearings website at https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Design/accessandhearings/default.htm.If you have any questions about this data, please contact LeRoy Patterson, Access and Hearing Manager - LeRoy.Patterson@wsdot.wa.gov - (360) 705-7266. If you're having trouble viewing these services, please contact our Online Map Support.23 years ago
- This layer represents the proportion of deaths in a population due to cardiovascular disease (NCHS 113: Major cardiovascular diseases). The rate represents the age adjusted rate per 100,000 population. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=82163 years ago
- This layer represents exposure to traffic-related air pollution, which has been associated with adverse health effects such as cardiovascular disease mortality, respiratory health and an increased risk of low birth weight. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=889963 years ago
- Polygons depict 5 year time of travel estimates for active group a public drinking water supplies. Source location data were obtained from the Washington State Department of Health, Office of Drinking Water. This layer is used in the Source Water Assessment Protection application https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/swap/index.html. Data is updated Monday mornings. Check the "Data updated:" date in the Details section. Metadata dates are not automatically updated.63 years ago
- This layer represents the population of people 16 years and older that are in the labor force and registered as unemployed. This measure was derived from the following ACS Table "Employment Status" (DP03) columns HC02_VC05, HC01_VC07. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=62763 years ago
- This layer represents a sum of all race/ethnicity categories EXCEPT White/Non-Hispanic, this includes: Black, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian-Other Pacific Islander, Two or more races and the ethnicity grouping of "Spanish/Hispanic/Latino". A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=470763 years ago
- The 2021 update to the Project Delivery Plan represents a snapshot as of July, 1 2021 of the project specific plan for work to be delivered by the Washington State Department of Transportation for state fiscal years 2022 through 2028. The update includes the following general assumptions and concepts:Aligns with Legislative direction provided in the 2021 Transportation Budget (ESHB 1160.SL) .Basis for WSDOT's 2021-23 Capital Improvement and Preservation Plan (CIPP) Budget Submittal.Provides Intent for Delivery.Includes over-programming the Roadway Preservation (P1) Program.How does the 2021 Project Delivery Plan help shape transportation in Washington?It meets the Federal Highway Administration's requirement for states to program four years of projects in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and includes all projects funded by the State Legislature. The plan is updated annually to ensure that budget changes on projects match up with enacted budgets.What are the benefits of the 2021 Project Delivery Plan?By identifying six years of projects, we have better coordination and planning between WSDOT and local governments.The plan prioritizes where project funds will be spent first; this allows us to use any extra savings or new revenue on projects that are ready to be built.In addition, WSDOT commits, or obligates, the federal funding for the Delivery Plan. This qualifies Washington to receive federal funds that are redistributed annually when other states do not obligate all their funds.83 years ago
- This layer represents the percentage of the population five years and older with limited English proficiency (LEP). LEP is defined as those who speak English less than "very well" or "not at all". A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=62063 years ago
- The 2019 update to the Project Delivery Plan represents a snapshot as of July, 31 2019 of the project specific plan for work to be delivered by the Washington State Department of Transportation for state fiscal years 2020 through 2030. The update includes the following general assumptions and concepts:Aligns with Legislative direction provided in the 2019 Transportation Budget (ESHB 1160.SL) .Basis for WSDOT's 2019-21 Capital Improvement and Preservation Plan (CIPP) Budget Submittal.Provides Intent for Delivery.Includes over-programming the Roadway Preservation (P1) Program.How does the 2019 Project Delivery Plan help shape transportation in Washington?It meets the Federal Highway Administration's requirement for states to program four years of projects in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and includes all projects funded by the State Legislature. The plan is updated annually to ensure that budget changes on projects match up with enacted budgets.What are the benefits of the 2019 Project Delivery Plan?By identifying ten years of projects, we have better coordination and planning between WSDOT and local governments.The plan prioritizes where project funds will be spent first; this allows us to use any extra savings or new revenue on projects that are ready to be built.In addition, WSDOT commits, or obligates, the federal funding for the Delivery Plan. This qualifies Washington to receive federal funds that are redistributed annually when other states do not obligate all their funds.83 years ago
- GeoMetrix Geodetic Survey Office, Survey Monument DatabaseThis application displays geodetic survey control monuments installed or maintained by the Washington State Department of Transportation and provides access to the data sheet for each monument. National Geodetic Survey stations located within Washington, Oregon, and Idaho are displayed for reference.The database is a set of entities and attributes as referenced to individual geographic locations, hereafter referred to as "Point". Each individual Point has a location relative to all other points in the database as referenced to a coordinate grid. The relative location of the points as represented in this database correspond to the physical or determined locations of Survey Control Monumentation.Attribute values of each point may contain accuracy data, physical descriptions on the monuments, descriptions for retracement and recovery, horizontal and vertical reference datum's, dates of recovery, determination, origin of data values, and methods used for value determination. Feedback and data questions should be sent to: monument@wsdot.wa.gov.This map is for display purposes only and is not intended for any legal representation. The current (production) version of this application can be found at https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/monument/gis/index.html. 23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This feature service is a duplicate of Washington School District Boundaries with the areas of the Pacific Ocean, Puget Sound, Lake Washington, and the southern Columbia River masked for cartographic purposes.This data was compiled by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) to provide boundary and attribute information for the 295 Public School Districts in the State of Washington. The polygons are our best representation of current district boundaries based on legal descriptions, county, and other available GIS data. Users should contact the local school district(s) to confirm the interpretation of district boundaries in questions.Attribute definitions with alias in [ ] and source in ():OrganizationId [Organization Id] - Unique organization code for database purposes (EDS)ESDCode [ESD Code] - Educational Service District unique code (EDS)ESDNum [ESD Number] - Educational Service District numberESDName [ESD Name] - Educational Service District name (EDS)LEACode [LEA Code] - Local Educational Authority/District unique code (EDS)LEAName [LEA Name] - Local Educational Authority/District name (EDS)ShortName [Short Name] - Abbreviated District name (Calculated)PhysicalAddress [School Physical Address]- Physical Address of school (EDS)MailingAddress [School Mailing Address] - Mailing Address of school (EDS)AdministratorName [Administrator Name] - School Administrator's name (EDS)AdministratorEmail [Administrator Email] - School Administrator's email (EDS)Phone [Phone] - District phone (EDS)Website [Website] - District website URL (Edited)County [County] - Primary District County (EDS)Counties [All Counties] - All Counties with areas in District (GIS)CongressionalDistricts [Congressional Districts] - All Congressional Districts with areas in District (EDS)LegislativeDistricts [Legislative Districts] - All Legislative Districts with areas in District (EDS)Type [Type] - Type of School District: Public School District, Charter District, or Tribal Compact (EDS)TransportationRegion [Transportation Region] - Transportation Coordinator Regions63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- **NOTE: This feature service has replaced "Vocational/Technical Skills Centers".**This data was compiled by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) to provide location and attribute information regarding currently active skill centers in the State of Washington. Skill centers are regional secondary schools that serve high school students from multiple school districts. They provide instruction in preparatory programs that are either too expensive or too specialized for school districts to operate individually. More information about skill centers can be found on OSPI's skill centers web page.Attribute definitions with alias in [ ]:SkillCenter [Skill Center] - Skill center nameSkillCenter_Label [Skill Center Label] - Formatted skill center name label for GIS purposesType [Type] - Type of skill center campus (core, branch, satellite, or rural satellite)ProgramType [Program Type] - Types of programs offered at campusProgramType_Label [Program Type Label] - Formatted program type label for GIS purposesAddress [Address] - Campus addressCity [City] - Campus cityState [State] - Campus stateZipcode [Zip code] - Campus zip codePhone [Phone] - Campus phoneWebsite [Website] - Skill center websiteCampusName [Campus Name] - Campus nameHostDistrict [Host District] - Skill center host districtDirector [Director] - Skill center or campus directorMemberDistricts [Member Districts] - Skill center member school districtsDate [Date] - Year foundedLongitude [Longitude] - Longitude of campus GIS pointLatitude [Latitude] - Latitude of campus GIS point63 years ago
- *NOTE: This feature service replaced "K-12 Schools".**This data was compiled by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) to provide location and attribute information regarding currently active public schools in the State of Washington. This layer should match the current School Directory published by OSPI from the Education Data System (EDS). This layer includes Charter Schools, Tribal Compact Schools, and Vocational/Technical Skills Centers previously published seperately.Attribute definitions with alias in [ ] and source in ():SchoolCode [School Code] - Unique school code assigned by OSPI (EDS)OrganizationId [Organization Id] - Unique organization code for database purposes (EDS)SchoolName [School Name] - Name of school as it recorded in the Schools Directory (EDS)Label [Label] - Label field for mapping purposes (GIS-not yet used).ESDCode [ESD Code] - Educational Service District unique code (EDS)ESDNum [ESD Number] - Educational Service District numberESDName [ESD Name] - Educational Service District name (EDS)LEACode [LEA Code] - Local Educational Authority/District unique code (EDS)LEAName [LEA Name] - Local Educational Authority/District name (EDS)LowestGrade [Lowest Grade] - Lowest grade served at school (EDS)HighestGrade [Highest Grade] - Highest grade served at school (EDS)LowGrade_Int [Low Grade Integer] - Lowest grade served at school as integer (GIS)HighGrade_Int [High Grade Integer] - Highest grade served at school as integer (GIS)OrgCategoryList [Organizational Category List] - Organizational Category List (EDS)AYPCode [AYP Code] - Adequate Yearly Progress Code (EDS)AYPCodeDes [AYP Code Description] - Adequate Yearly Progress Code Description (EDS)GradeCategory [Grade Category] - Grade Category, e.g. Elementary School, Middle School, etc. (EDS)PhysicalAddress [School Physical Address]- Physical Address of school (EDS)MailingAddress [School Mailing Address] - Mailing Address of school (EDS)PrincipalName [School Principal Name] - School Principal's name (EDS)Email [School Principal Email] - School Principal's email (EDS)Phone [Phone] - School Telephone Number (EDS)Latitude [Latitude] - Latitude Coordinate of school based on mapped location (GIS)Longitude [Longitude] - Longitude Coordinate of school based on mapped location (GIS)County [County of School] - County of school based on mapped location (GIS)CongressionalDistrict [Congressional District of School] - Congressional District of school based on mapped location (GIS)LegislativeDistrict [Legislative District of school] - Legislative District of school (GIS)63 years ago
- From 2018 to 2020, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) worked with agency partners including the city of Bellingham, city of Ferndale, Lummi Nation, Port of Bellingham, Whatcom Transportation Authority (WTA) and Whatcom Council of Governments (WCOG) to better understand mobility challenges along the Interstate-5 (I-5) corridor through Bellingham. Regular congestion happens during peak travel at I-5 interchanges and on connecting major streets.The resulting I-5 Operations & Transportation Demand Analysis helped agencies to understand when and where congestion occurs and the travel characteristics of users of this section of I-5. The Whatcom I-5 Operations Survey Story Map communicates these survey results to planning partners and the public. Please contact Katie Bunge at Katarina.Bunge@wsdot.wa.gov regarding this data product. 23 years ago
- Point locations for all Washington non-military airports. Be advised that this data might not show an airport's current capabilities or configuration. Inaccuracies in the data may include: spatial and/or attribute errors in data, changes due to airport construction, and recent changes in airport capabilities. If you have any questions about the information presented here, please contact John MacArthur, john.macarthur@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- Lines that delineate locations for all Washington non-military airport runways. Public and Private. Be advised that this data might not show an airport's current capabilities or configuration. Inaccuracies in the data may include: spatial and/or attribute errors in data, changes due to airport construction, and recent changes in airport capabilities. If you have any questions about the information presented here, please contact John MacArthur, john.macarthur@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This data set is a snapshop of the current inventory of all Chronic Environmental Deficiency (CED) sites on WSDOT highways, including all active, resolved (constructed) and stabilized CED sites. A CED is a site along a state highway where recent, frequent, and chronic maintenance or emergency repairs (typically 3 times in 10 years) to WSDOT infrastructure are causing impacts to fish or fish habitat.83 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- Washington State County Boundaries including Department of Natural Resources (DNR) county codes. This data is created from the WA Public Land Survey source data maintained by the DNR.WA County Boundaries Metadata93 years ago
- The data provide a small-scale cartographic rendition of proposed Washington State highways that are described in RCW 47.17 but have no active plans to be built. This dataset is part of the the linear reference system (LRS) used by Washington State Department of Transportation. This dataset is used: 1) for general-purpose base mapping; 2) as a Linear Referencing System (LRS); 3) for locating features on the proposed State Routes for which there are no active plans to be built by State Route Accumulated Route Mileage (dynamic segmentation). This dataset is a snapshot of the roadway system, effective 12/31/2022.83 years ago
- Surfgrass (Phyllospadix spp.) is a submerged aquatic plant with recognized ecological value and management protections. This dataset summarizes surfgrass occurrence using data from the ShoreZone Inventory. Surfgrass is classified as being patchy (less than 50%) or continuous (greater than 50%) along each unit of shoreline (an area with similar physical characteristics). The ShoreZone Inventory includes all saltwater shorelines statewide. It was completed between 1994 and 2000 using aerial videography collected at low tide.93 years ago
- Dunegrass (Leymus leymus) is a native plant found on spits and berms. This dataset summarizes dunegrass occurrence using data from the ShoreZone Inventory. Dunegrass is classified as being patchy (less than 50%) or continuous (greater than 50%) along each unit of shoreline (an area with similar physical characteristics). The majority of the shoreline is described by line data, polygon features exist in some areas with extensive shallows. The ShoreZone Inventory includes all saltwater shorelines statewide. It was completed between 1994 and 2000 using aerial videography collected at low tide. The complete ShoreZone Inventory can be found under Download Data.93 years ago
- This dataset summarizes floating kelp (Bull Kelp and Giant kelp) occurrence using data from the ShoreZone Inventory. Kelp is a type of brown algae with recognized ecological value and management protections. It is classified as being patchy (less than 50%) or continuous (greater than 50%) along each unit of shoreline (an area with similar physical characteristics). The ShoreZone Inventory includes all saltwater shorelines statewide. It was completed between 1994 and 2000 using aerial videography collected at low tide. The complete ShoreZone Inventory can be found under Download Data.63 years ago
- The Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) is a comprehensive aggregated collection of hydrologic unit data consistent with the national criteria for delineation and resolution. It defines the areal extent of surface water drainage to a point except in coastal or lake front areas where there could be multiple outlets as stated by the "Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD)" “Standard” (http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/). Watershed boundaries are determined solely upon science-based hydrologic principles, not favoring any administrative boundaries or special projects, nor particular program or agency. This dataset represents the hydrologic unit boundaries to the 12-digit (6th level) for the entire United States. Some areas may also include additional subdivisions representing the 14- and 16-digit hydrologic unit (HU). At a minimum, the HUs are delineated at 1:24,000-scale in the conterminous United States, 1:25,000-scale in Hawaii, Pacific basin and the Caribbean, and 1:63,360-scale in Alaska, meeting the National Map Accuracy Standards (NMAS). Higher resolution boundaries are being developed where partners and data exist and will be incorporated back into the WBD. WBD data are delivered as a dataset of polygons and corresponding lines that define the boundary of the polygon. WBD polygon attributes include hydrologic unit codes (HUC), size (in the form of acres and square kilometers), name, downstream hydrologic unit code, type of watershed, non-contributing areas, and flow modifications. The HUC describes where the unit is in the country and the level of the unit. WBD line attributes contain the highest level of hydrologic unit for each boundary, line source information and flow modifications.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- Welcome to Washington state's Freight Transportation System map application! Detailed descriptions are provided below. To get started, press the View Application button in the upper-right corner of this page. Once open, please read the brief instruction provided. This web map application provides an interactive GIS tool for users to view Washington state's freight transportation system by types and modes. It reflects WSDOT's 2021 Freight and Goods Transportation System update, and the National Highway Freight Network designations verified and published by FHWA as of 2019. This web map application was intended to provide valuable freight data sources to support transportation planning efforts, and includes the following sublayers: 1. Freight Intermodal Facilities - shows major freight intermodal facilities in Washington state, including cargo airports, rail intermodal terminals, and major ports handling freight shipments.2. 2021 Freight and Goods Transportation System (FGTS) – classifies freight corridors by modes in Washington State based on annual freight tonnage moved, including truck, rail, and waterway freight corridors. Each modal network is classified into five tiers and the specific annual tonnage thresholds are described below. 1) FGTS truck corridors include: T-1 corridors: more than 10 million tons T-2 corridors: 4 million to 10 million tons T-3 corridors: 300,000 to 4 million tons T-4 corridors: 100,000 to 300,000 tons T-5 corridors: at least 20,000 tons in 60 days and less than 100,000 tons per year 2) FGTS rail corridors include: R-1 corridors: more than 5 million tons R-2 corridors: 1 million to 5 million tons R-3 corridors: 500,000 to 1 million tons R-4 corridors: 100,000 to 500,000 tons R-5 corridors: Less than 100,000 tons 3) FGTS waterway corridors include: W-1 corridors: more than 25 million tons W-2 corridors: 10 million to 25 million tons W-3 corridors: 5 million to 10 million tons W-4 corridors: 2.5 million to 5 million tons W-5 corridors: 0.9 million to 2.5 million tons 3. Truck Freight Economic Corridors - built upon Freight and Goods Transportation System (FGTS) tonnage classification and takes into account freight system resiliency and first/last mile connectivity to freight land uses and facilities. It includes following components: High volume truck corridors: T-1 and T-2 freight corridors; Alternative freight routes: routes that serve as alternatives to primary cross-state freight routes during severe weather or other disruptions; First/last mile connector routes: truck routes that connect freight-intensive land uses to T-1 and T-2 freight corridors, and alternative freight routes. 4. National Highway Freight Network – established under the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) consisting of four components: Primary Highway Freight System (PHFS) Other Interstate portions not on the PHFS Critical Rural Freight Corridors (CRFCs) Critical Urban Freight Corridors (CUFCs) 5. Manufacturing and warehousing land use (2020 parcel data) - shows parcels with manufacturing and warehousing land use codes from 2020 statewide parcel database: https://wsdot.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=3dca0b72eae94c098b21329e1e61afd76. Jurisdictional Boundaries - include Regional Transportation Planning Organization, County Boundaries, and City Limits.For more information about FGTS system, please visit https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/freight/fgts. If you have any questions about this data, please contact Wenjuan Zhao at zhaow@wsdot.wa.gov or 360-705-6990. If you're having trouble viewing this application, please contact our Online Map Support. 23 years ago
- This is the shoreline modification layer from the larger Washington ShoreZone Inventory. It shows the percentage of anthropogenic shoreline modification in each shoreline segment. Information on other human features are also included in the attribute table, such as the number of docks, ramps, piers, and slips. Shoreline modification can take the form of piers, bulkheads, rip rap or other forms. The ShoreZone Inventory includes all saltwater shorelines statewide. It was completed between 1994 and 2000 using aerial videography collected at low tide.The Washington State ShoreZone Inventory can be used to better understand and manage Washington's coastal ecosystems. The inventory is useful for identifying the location of sensitive resources, for characterizing the distribution of habitats, and for identifying rare features. For example, maps of the inventory data can illustrate the distribution of eelgrass. Data can also be analyzed numerically to characterize abundance, such as the percentage of a shoreline that has been modified, or the relative abundance of different types of shorelines.93 years ago
- Eelgrass (Zostera marina) and surfgrass (Phyllospadix spp.) are submerged aquatic plants with recognized ecological value and management protections. This dataset summarizes eelgrass and surfgrass occurrence using data from the ShoreZone Inventory. These seagrasses are classified as being patchy (less than 50%) or continuous (greater than 50%) along each unit of shoreline (an area with similar physical characteristics). The majority of the shoreline is described by line data, polygon features exist in some areas with extensive shallows. The ShoreZone Inventory includes all saltwater shorelines statewide. It was completed between 1994 and 2000 using aerial videography collected at low tide.93 years ago
- This is the eelgrass line layer from the larger Washington ShoreZone Inventory. Eelgrass (Zostera marina) is a submerged aquatic plant with recognized ecological value and management protections. The ShoreZone Inventory includes all saltwater shorelines statewide. It was completed between 1994 and 2000 using aerial videography collected at low tide. The complete ShoreZone Inventory can be found under Download Data.The Washington State ShoreZone Inventory can be used to better understand and manage Washington's coastal ecosystems. The inventory is useful for identifying the location of sensitive resources, for characterizing the distribution of habitats, and for identifying rare features. For example, maps of the inventory data can illustrate the distribution of eelgrass. Data can also be analyzed numerically to characterize abundance, such as the percentage of a shoreline that has been modified, or the relative abundance of different types of shorelines.93 years ago
- Kelp is a type of brown algae with recognized ecological value and management protections. This dataset summarizes kelp occurrence of all kelp species using data from the ShoreZone Inventory. Kelp is classified as being patchy (less than 50%) or continuous (greater than 50%) along each unit of shoreline (an area with similar physical characteristics). The ShoreZone Inventory includes all saltwater shorelines statewide. It was completed between 1994 and 2000 using aerial videography collected at low tide. The complete ShoreZone Inventory can be found under Download Data.93 years ago
- NHD_MajorWaterbodies are a subset of the largest waterbody features selected from the High Resolution NHD dataset for Washington State. This subset includes only waterbodies that are classified as lake/ponds ,reservoirs, or estuaries and that are > 1 sqKm (10763900 sqft).The National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) is a feature-based database that interconnects and uniquely identifies the stream segments or reaches that make up the nation's surface water drainage system. This high-resolution NHD, generally developed at 1:12,000/1:24,000 scale, adds detail to the original 1:100,000-scale NHD Local resolution NHD is being developed where partners and data exist. The NHD contains reach codes for networked features, flow direction, names, and centerline representations for areal water bodies. Reaches are also defined on waterbodies and the approximate shorelines of the Great Lakes, the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the Gulf of Mexico. The NHD also incorporates the National Spatial Data Infrastructure framework criteria established by the Federal Geographic Data Committee.63 years ago
- The Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) is a comprehensive aggregated collection of hydrologic unit data consistent with the national criteria for delineation and resolution. It defines the areal extent of surface water drainage to a point except in coastal or lake front areas where there could be multiple outlets as stated by the "Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD)" “Standard” (http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/). Watershed boundaries are determined solely upon science-based hydrologic principles, not favoring any administrative boundaries or special projects, nor particular program or agency. This dataset represents the hydrologic unit boundaries to the 12-digit (6th level) for the entire United States. Some areas may also include additional subdivisions representing the 14- and 16-digit hydrologic unit (HU). At a minimum, the HUs are delineated at 1:24,000-scale in the conterminous United States, 1:25,000-scale in Hawaii, Pacific basin and the Caribbean, and 1:63,360-scale in Alaska, meeting the National Map Accuracy Standards (NMAS). Higher resolution boundaries are being developed where partners and data exist and will be incorporated back into the WBD. WBD data are delivered as a dataset of polygons and corresponding lines that define the boundary of the polygon. WBD polygon attributes include hydrologic unit codes (HUC), size (in the form of acres and square kilometers), name, downstream hydrologic unit code, type of watershed, non-contributing areas, and flow modifications. The HUC describes where the unit is in the country and the level of the unit. WBD line attributes contain the highest level of hydrologic unit for each boundary, line source information and flow modifications.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- The Overwater Structures in Marine Waters of Washington State is made up of thousands of digitized overwater structures such as docks, bridges, floats, structural support fill, and other structures such as floating homes. Structures were digitized from three (3) foot/one (1) meter resolution color orthophotos taken between 2002 to 2006 by either the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (Washington DNR) or the United States Department of Agriculture National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP). The data layer is statewide and includes all marine areas classified as definitely or probably navigable by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW 90.56.010(15)), as well as a limited set of areas classified as possibly navigable. The datatable has been standardized so that overwater structures can be looked up based on structure type, structure size, waterbody name, township, county, or waterbody navigability. NOTE: While Washington DNR is willing to share the data with other entities, there are currently no plans to QA/QC the data or maintain it.To map and quantify the extent of overwater structures on and adjacent to state-owned aquatic lands as part of the take analysis for a proposed State-owned Aquatic Lands Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP).93 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This dataset provides directional traffic data for application to the modified, or full design level matrix in Chapters 430, or 440 of the Design Manual to establish the appropriate design class for the Design Elements of a project. Updated DHV values and SRMPs have been added.83 years ago
- This layer represents a combined ranking of Deaths from Cardiovascular Disease and Low Birth Weight.63 years ago
- This layer represents a combined ranking of Limited English, No HS Diploma, Race/Ethnicity, Poverty, Unaffordable Housing and Percent Unemployed.63 years ago
- The 2022 Project Delivery Plan (“Plan”) is a six-year list of projects that are prioritized and programmed for delivery. The investment strategies for the six-year list of projects are based on performance-based analyses within Programs and Sub-Programs with a ten-year planning horizon. The Plan aligns with WSDOT’s performance-based approach to transportation decision-making.83 years ago
- This dataset describes Tribal Lands in Washington State. Included are areas where the tribes ceded title to their historic areas of use to the U.S. Government through various treaties enacted during the later half of the 19th century. Boundary lines have been digitized from a variety of digital data sources including 1:100,000 streams for boundaries described in treaties as following a stream or river, 1:24k Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA), Watershed Administrative Unit (WAU) and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) boundaries for boundaries referred to in treaties as 'divide', 'summit' or 'between the waters of', 1:100,000 Major Public Lands (for current reservation areas), 10 meter DEM and 7.5 minute USGS digital Quad maps (to define ridgelines and 'divide' where WRIA, WAU or HUC boundaries don't exist) and NAIP orthophoto imagery (to get a feel for what a questionable boundary area actually looks like today). Ceded Land treaty areas are based on treaty language and US Government decrees dated 1854-1892. Natural geographic barriers such as streams and ridge lines were used where described or eluded to in treaty descriptions. Coordinate based latitude/longitude boundary lines were used in some Central Washington areas where described. References to general compass directions were followed using natural barriers such as watershed boundaries or drainages wherever possible. Some treaty boundary descriptions were found to be inadequate, inaccurate and in some cases misleading in nature in describing what should have been a natural boundary or even a coordinate based solution to a property description. Some of these boundary areas open to interpretation are discussed below in the Supplemental Information based on the language and definite boundaries of other treaty areas. Ceded areas in Oregon and Idaho from the Camp Stevens Treaties have been included in this dataset. The Washington State Department of Ecology makes no warranty for the accuracy of this material and is not libel for its use. Ecology will maintain this data layer for its own use and distribute to all interested parties. Updates, corrections and documentation should be submitted to the contact person. This data may or may not reflect the most current tribal reservation areas. Tribal reservations are updated regularly in the Major Public Lands (MPL) layer maintained by Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This GIS data is draft information and a work in progress and should be used only as a generalized visual guide to 150 year old treaties of limited content.93 years ago
- Ambient monitoring measures the status of air quality throughout the state to assess trends, compliance with federal and state air quality standards, effectiveness of control strategies and attainment plans, health effects and environmental damage; respond to citizen complaints; evaluate specific geographic or hot-spot air quality concerns; and create environmental indicators. Emission inventory is the cataloging of sources of air pollution and the emissions from those sources. Inventory data are critical to the understanding of the causes of air pollution problems and creation of appropriate solutions. Meteorological forecasting and dispersion modeling of air pollutants are essential to understanding the movement and buildup of air pollution; the carrying capacity of airsheds; the interaction of pollutants; and the location of maximum impact of sources of pollution. As of September 26, 2005 there are no longer any areas of Washington designated as "NONATTAINMENT."63 years ago
- Drought Areas data description: This data layer is derived from copying the designated WRIAs. WRIAs data description: Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA) for Washington State at 1:24,000 scale. WRIAs were formalized under WAC 173-500-040 and authorized under the Water Resources Act of 1971, RCW 90.54. Ecology was given the responsibility for the development and management of these administrative and planning boundaries. These boundaries represent the administrative under pinning of this agency's business activities. The original WRIA boundary agreements and judgments were reached jointly by Washington's natural resource agencies (Ecology, Natural Resources, Fish and Wildlife) in 1970.63 years ago
- Spatial representation of surface water points of diversion locations as interpreted from water-right documents, including (but not limited to) water-right certificates, water-right permits, water-right applications, and water-right claims.http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wr/rights/water-right-home.html63 years ago
- Statewide Ecopia 3 foot Land Cover (2021-2022)This raster land cover data is based off of high-resolution statewide imagery from 2021-2022. It was used by Ecopia to extract and digitize the entire state into 7 different land cover classes. Data SpecificationImagery Used for Extraction: Pixel resolution: 15 cm (6")Camera sensor: Hexagon Pushbroom (Content Mapper)Date of capture: 06/25/2021 - 08/14/2022Date of Vector Extraction: June 2023Extraction Methodology:Ecopia uses proprietary extraction and modeling software to process raw images into high-resolution land cover classifications.Quality Measurements:Measure Name - Threshold across Impervious Polygons:False Negatives <= 5% All PolygonsFalse Positives <= 5% All PolygonsValid Interpretation >= 95% All PolygonsMinimum Area 100% All PolygonsValid Geometry 100% All PolygonsMeasure Name - Threshold across Natural Polygons:False Negatives <=5% All PolygonsFalse Positives <=5% All PolygonsValid Interpretation >=90% All PolygonsMinimum Area 100% All PolygonsValid Geometry 100% All PolygonsLand Cover Classes:UnclassifiedImperviousImpervious, covered by treesShrub/low vegetationTree/forest/high vegetationOpen waterRailroadVegetation (Canopy Mapping)Tree canopy will be captured as a unique polygon layer. It can therefore overlap impervious layers.High vegetation is distinguished from low vegetation based on crown, texture, and derived height models. Leveraging stereo imagery produces results using 3D elevation models used to aid the distinction of vegetation categories. Distinguishing low from high vegetation is based on a 5m threshold, but this is not always feasible, especially in areas where heavy canopy prevents a visualization of the ground. In these circumstances, high vegetation will be given the priority over low vegetation. For more information visit: www.ecopiatech.com23 years ago
- SalmonScape, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's interactive, computer mapping system, is one of the most important tools created thus far to deliver scientific information to those involved in on-the-ground salmon recovery projects.SalmonScape delivers the science that helps recovery planners identify and prioritize the restoration and protection activities that offer the greatest benefit to fish. The site also offers a significant environmental education tool for middle school and high school students. SalmonScape merges fish and habitat data collected by state, federal, tribal and local biologists and presents it in an integrated system that can be readily accessed by other agencies and citizens. >>> MORE INFORMATIONSalmonScape is an interactive mapping application designed to display and report a wide range of data related to salmon distribution, status, and habitats. The data sources used by SalmonScape include stream specific fish and habitat data, and information about stock status and recovery evaluations.Make sure to check out SalmonScape Help or FAQ for other information.Would you like to send Feedback?23 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) sites. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description - Area Maintenance FacilityPrimary maintenance facility centrally located to serve a designated Area within a Region. Typically includes auto mechanic shop, fuel service, and storage for vehicles and consumable inventory (e.g., gravel, sand, salt, paint).83 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) sites. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description - Pits, Quarries, Stockpile, and Waste SiteLess-developed land used intermittently to quarry, process, and store consumable highway maintenance products such as sand or gravel. Typically supports one or no buildings and serves highway segments that are in proximity to the site.83 years ago
- Points depict aggregate sources that have been tested by the WSDOT State Materials Laboratory and are created from data in the Aggregate Sources Approval database (ASA). The Aggregate Sources Approval database identifies aggregate sources that have been tested by WSDOT, and have been assigned a county letter code with a sequential number for that county. It should be noted that there are sources that have been tested, but not classified with a county code, and are therefore not included in the database. Also, there are sources in the database that are not currently approved for use as materials on construction projects.83 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) sites. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.Facility Type & Description - Section Maintenance FacilitySecondary maintenance facility located to serve specific highway segments within a Maintenance Area. This type of facility may specialize in materials or equipment storage that meet the specific needs of a particular locale (e.g., snow and ice fighting equipment in mountainous areas)83 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows lanes designated for acceleration movements at intersection locations. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- Polygons depict the boundaries of Washington State's incorporated municipalities, as recorded by the Washington State Office of Financial Management. Attributes include city names as provided by the Washington State Office of Financial Management, and Federal Information Processing Standard codes(FIPS) as provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The Washington State Office of Financial Management provided FIPS codes for cities incorporated after the National Institute of Standards and Technology's FIPS code publication date. GNIS (Geographic Name Information System) codes provided by the Washington State Department of Revenue have been included for this quarter. For this particular update, all annexations approved by Office of Financial Management for Fourth Quarter of 2023 are included. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This is a detailed GIS database of public access locations (point features) along coastal shorelines. It contains a rich variety of information such as amenities (boat launches, toilets, ADA accessible, etc.) and activities (tidepooling, hiking, shellfishing, etc.) that are available at each access point.The information was collected using a GPS in the field between 2008-2010 and is updated as resources allow.For more information, contact Christina Kellum, Washington State Department of Ecology GIS Manager, gis@ecy.wa.gov.63 years ago
- This dataset contains spatial and attribute information of the Surface Water Quality Standards for the State of Washington, Chapter 173-201A WAC. Four views of the WQ Standard are contained in this dataset, Freshwater Beneficial Uses, Seasonal Supplemental Spawning and Egg Incubation Temperature Standards, rules designated in Table 602, and exceptions to Table 602 listed in the footnotes. If any discrepancies are found between GIS layers and the published rule, the published rule takes precedence. Updated April 2018.63 years ago
- These polygon features represent Water Quality Improvement (WQI) projects managed by the Washington State Department of Ecology. WQI projects can be TMDLs, Straight To Implementation (STI) plans, 4b projects and TMDL Alternatives. The boundaries show where the WQI project applies and is being implemented. TMDL Boundaries identified as "In Development" are considered draft and are subject to change when the project has been approved by the U.S. EPA. U.S. EPA only approves TMDLs and 4b projects. Boundaries are representations of each particular project and does not replace the official version of the approved TMDL report. Please see the TMDL Project webpage for specific information about that project. TMDL projects are required by the Federal Clean Water Act to identify pollution sources and pollution load reductions needed for water bodies to meet water quality standards. Once a TMDL project has been approved by the U.S. EPA, it enters an implementation phase where both point source and non-point source pollution is reduced through permit limits regulated under the NPDES system and through best management practices for land uses that contribute to non-point source pollution. Ecology’s water quality program works with permittees, local governments, watershed stakeholders, and residents to reduce sources of pollution to protect our aquatic resources and public health.63 years ago
- The information presented in this application provides point locations based on the Washington State Department of Transportations (WSDOT) 24k LRS routing layer. These points mark the milepost values to the nearest 1/10th of a mile on Interstate, US Highway, and State Routes in Washington and provide information about the milepost location such as the Route ID, milepost value, roadway direction, latitude/longitude, and the date of the last update to the data.If you have any questions about this application, please email OnlineMapSupport@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- Administrative boundaries for Washington State Parks, which includes Park Management Areas, Park Sub-Regions, and Park Regions.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- Administrative boundaries for Washington State Parks, which includes Park Management Areas, Park Sub-Regions, and Park Regions.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- Administrative boundaries for Washington State Parks, which includes Park Management Areas, Park Sub-Regions, and Park Regions.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- Administrative boundaries for Washington State Parks, which includes Park Management Areas, Park Sub-Regions, and Park Regions.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).23 years ago
- 2019 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures for state highway traffic count locations. Data represents all directions of travel for the given location.63 years ago
- This dataset provides directional traffic data for application to the modified, or full design level matrix in Chapters 430, or 440 of the Design Manual to establish the appropriate design class for the Design Elements of a project. Updated DHV values and SRMPs have been added.63 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- NHD_MajorStreams are a subset of the largest linear stream/river features selected from the High Resolution NHD dataset for Washington State. This subset includes only NHDflowlines that have GNIS Names that include "River", or have a Stream Order > 7, or have a GNIS Name that includes "Creek" and is longer than 24 km. The National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) is a feature-based database that interconnects and uniquely identifies the stream segments or reaches that make up the nation's surface water drainage system. This high-resolution NHD, generally developed at 1:12,000/1:24,000 scale, adds detail to the original 1:100,000-scale NHD Local resolution NHD is being developed where partners and data exist. The NHD contains reach codes for networked features, flow direction, names, and centerline representations for areal water bodies. Reaches are also defined on waterbodies and the approximate shorelines of the Great Lakes, the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the Gulf of Mexico. The NHD also incorporates the National Spatial Data Infrastructure framework criteria established by the Federal Geographic Data Committee. Updated March 201963 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This dataset provides directional traffic data for application to the modified, or full design level matrix in Chapters 430, or 440 of the Design Manual to establish the appropriate design class for the Design Elements of a project. Updated DHV values and SRMPs have been added.83 years ago
- The Washington Commodity Flow Dashboard displays the existing and forecasted freight flows for Washington state by tonnage and value. It includes two components, one for commodity flows at county geographies, and the other at MPO/RTPO geographies. The dashboard allows users to select freight commodity flow data based on following filters:Data year: baseline (2017) or forecasted year (2020, 2022, 2030, 2040, and 2050).Trade direction: import, export, or domestic.Origination/Destination Geography: County level – Washington origin/destination by County and external origin/destination by state. MPO/RTPO level - Washington origin/destination by MPO, RTPO and external origin/destination by state. The dashboard displays the selected results in total freight tonnage and value and also provides detailed breakdown by major freight industry and domestic mode used for freight movement. Please refer to the project report for more information on the detailed methodology and the limitations. For further assistance, please contact:Wenjuan Zhao, Multimodal Freight Systems Planning EngineerWenjuan.Zhao@wsdot.wa.gov360-763-807023 years ago
- Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Regions. These are the largest DNR administrative areas.WA DNR Regions MetadataClick to download93 years ago
- This is an extract from the State Highway Log that shows Highways of Statewide Significance along State Routes. State Route identifiers and locations based on State Route Mileposts and Accumulated Route Mileage are also included for geographic reference and for use with the Washington State Department of Transportation's 24k and 500k Linear Referencing Systems.83 years ago
- Highway Urban Areas, as defined by the Federal Highway Administration, are depicted as polygons.83 years ago
- Classified ShoreZone shoreline segments into 16 shoreline types based on substrate type and elevation. The ShoreZone Inventory characterizes several physical parameters within shoreline segments. The majority of the shoreline is described by line data. Polygon features exist in some areas with extensive shallows. The ShoreZone Inventory includes all saltwater shorelines statewide. It was completed between 1994 and 2000 using aerial videography collected at low tide.93 years ago
- The ShoreZone Inventory characterizes several physical parameters within shoreline segments. The majority of the shoreline is described by line data. Polygon features exist in some areas with extensive shallows. The ShoreZone Inventory includes all saltwater shorelines statewide. It was completed between 1994 and 2000 using aerial videography collected at low tide. The complete ShoreZone Inventory can be found under Download Data.93 years ago
- This dataset mapped 8 types of intertidal and shallow subtidal vegetation along saltwater shorelines in Skagit County and part of Island County in 1996 using an airborne multispectral scanner. This is one element of a larger dataset that includes substrate type, wave & current energy, water regime and tidal datum lines as well as an ArcGIS layer file. The complete dataset (all layers) can be accessed under "Download Data".93 years ago
- This is the salt marsh line layer from the larger Washington ShoreZone Inventory. The ShoreZone Inventory includes all saltwater shorelines statewide. It was completed between 1994 and 2000 using aerial videography collected at low tide.93 years ago
- This dataset mapped 8 types of intertidal and shallow subtidal vegetation along saltwater shorelines in Whatcom County in 1995 using an airborne multisptectral scanner. This is one element of a larger dataset that includes substrate type, wave & current energy, water regime and tidal datum lines as well as an ArcGIS layer file. The complete dataset (all layers) can be accessed under "Download Data".93 years ago
- This story map presents historical and contemporary distributions of kelp forests along the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Washington State. Kelp forests are critical to biodiversity because they create unique habitat for many species. Kelp forests are sensitive to many factors, such as climate, animal grazers and pollution. The Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) manages and monitors kelp forests as part of its stewardship responsibilities. Recently, DNR scientists teamed up with scientists from the University of Chicago and Marine Agronomics to study DNR’s long-term monitoring data along the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Outer Coast. This study compared contemporary kelp distribution from the ongoing monitoring with historical kelp distribution from maps summarizing field surveys from 1911-1912.This story map allows you to explore the historical and modern maps that we compared in order to assess changes in kelp abundance over the last century.23 years ago
- This story map describes seagrass monitoring at Dumas Bay conducted since 2008 by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This research uses an ecological monitoring protocol, designed by SeagrassNet, to detect fine scale changes in local seagrass resources.SeagrassNet is a global seagrass monitoring network that investigates the status of seagrass populations and the threats that affect these critical resources. The SeagrassNet program began in 2001 in the Western Pacific and now includes 126 sites in 33 countries with a global monitoring protocol and web-based data reporting system.More information on SeagrassNet monitoring at: seagrassnet.org23 years ago
- NHD_MajorAreas are a subset of the largest double banked stream/river polygon features selected from the High Resolution NHD dataset for Washington State. This subset includes only NHDAreas that have an associated NHD_MajorStream. NHD_MajorStreams are classified as those that have GNIS Names that include "River", or have a Stream Order > 7, or have a GNIS Name that includes "Creek" and is longer than 24 km. NHD_MajorAreas have an NHD_MajorStream flowing through it.The National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) is a feature-based database that interconnects and uniquely identifies the stream segments or reaches that make up the nation's surface water drainage system. This high-resolution NHD, generally developed at 1: 12,000/1:24,000 scale, adds detail to the original 1:100,000-scale NHD. Local resolution NHD is being developed where partners and data exist. The NHD contains reach codes for networked features, flow direction, names, and centerline representations for areal water bodies. Reaches are also defined on waterbodies and the approximate shorelines of the Great Lakes, the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the Gulf of Mexico. The NHD also incorporates the National Spatial Data Infrastructure framework criteria established by the Federal Geographic Data Committee. Updated March 201963 years ago
- This dataset represents county roads open to the public in Washington State as listed in the County Road Administration Board (CRAB) Road Log compiled as a GIS Linear Referencing System (LRS) using County Road Numbers and county milepost values. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- Selected major lakes and reservoirs of Washington State are depicted as polygons. Major reservoirs on the Columbia and Snake Rivers, and Lake Washington are excluded.83 years ago
- Major hydrography for Washington State represented as polygons. Features in this data set define the land extent of Washington state.83 years ago
- Highway Urban Areas, as defined by the Federal Highway Administration, are depicted as polygons.83 years ago
- The WSDOT GeoPortal is an application that allows users to view WSDOT spatial data (like Functional Class, Interchange Drawings, City Limits and State Routes) via a web browser. Users can check a box to select from a variety of base maps and data layers. They can click on the map to return a State Route Mile Post value or type an address to zoom to.For first time users: There is a Help and Users Guide that will assist you in getting started with the application. You can also access this guide from the application’s Help tool.With the GeoPortal, you can:Measure distance or area.Share your map via a url link.View State Routes, City Limits, County Boundaries, Congressional and Legislative Boundaries, WSDOT Regionand Maintenance Boundaries, Interchange Drawing Diagrams, State and Local Route Functional Class, Township/Section Boundaries, and more.Choose from a variety of basemaps including: Imagery, Topographic, OpenStreetMap, WSDOT Basemap, and more.Use tools to locate a State Route Milepost, Zoom to a Latitude/Longitude coordinate, County, City, Urban Area, or street address.Feedback and data questions should be sent to: onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 24K linear referencing system including state routes, ramps, turnbacks, ferry terminals, and proposed state routes. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This map service depicts historic data for the Washington State Route 500K linear referencing system. This data is a snapshot of the roadway system for the year specified in the LRS_Date field. This map service is maintained by the WSDOT GIS and Roadway Data Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please email onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov. If you have questions about the data, please email TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- State Routes are depicted as lines with State Route identifiers and route measure attributes. Routes in this featureclass are for the increasing side of the highway mileposting. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- State Routes are depicted as lines with State Route identifiers and route measure attributes. Routes in this featureclass are for the decreasing side of the highway mileposting. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- State Routes are depicted as lines with State Route identifiers and route measure attributes. Routes on State Route ramps. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- State Routes are depicted as lines with State Route identifiers and route measure attributes. Routes in this featureclass are Turnback Routes. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- State Routes are depicted as lines with State Route identifiers. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- State Routes are depicted as lines with State Route identifiers. Each SR is symbolized with a single line whether or not the highway is divided. Entrance, exit and collector/distributor ramps are not included, but spurs, couplets and reversible lanes are. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- State Routes are depicted as lines with State Route identifiers. Each SR is symbolized with a single line whether or not the highway is divided. Entrance, exit and collector/distributor ramps are not included, but spurs, couplets and reversible lanes are. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- State Routes are depicted as lines with State Route identifiers and route measure attributes. Routes in this featureclass are for Ferry Terminals and selected proposed State Routes. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This dataset provides geospatial locations for all of the valid Accumulated Route Mileage (ARM) and State Route Milepost (SRMP) values along State Routes in Washington State. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- Water right records can be searched on the Water Resources Explorer web map by document/record number or by the name of the person the water right was issued to (or the name of the claimant, if it is a water right claim).The web map is an efficient tool for anyone researching water rights or water right claims, or seeking to obtain a water right in Washington State. Consultants, real estate agents, local government workers, elected officials, and holders of existing water rights will find the map a valuable source of information.Links to water right documents allow the user access to scanned images of water resource documents that include:Water right certificates, water use permits, applications for water use, and claims of water use.The authorized, claimed, or requested quantity of water (both current and annual) and number of irrigated acres.The purpose of water use, priority date or date of first use, as well as the name of record.Information regarding metering, if required.Information not maintained directly by the Water Resources Program such as Ecology or USGS flow data from stream gauging stations.23 years ago
- This web application gives interactive access to 2000-2019 seagrass monitoring data from selected sites in greater Puget Sound. Seagrass species monitored include eelgrass, surfgrass and Zostera japonica. Underwater video is collected along transects and interpreted for species presence. This data is used for site-specific purposes as well as estimating the total area of eelgrass in greater Puget Sound. The estimates of total eelgrass area are the basis of the eelgrass vital sign reported by the Puget Sound Partnership.Eelgrass is a valuable aquatic plant in the marine nearshore that provides spawning grounds for Pacific herring, out-migrating corridors for juvenile salmon and importing feeding grounds and foraging habitats for waterbirds such as the Black Brant and Great Blue Heron. Eelgrass also improves water quality by reducing particle loads, acts as a sink for nutrients, and stabilizes sediment, thus counteracting erosion processes.23 years ago
- This feature class represents Bighorn Sheep Units (Hunting Areas) in Washington State for the 2023-2024 Hunting Season. These boundaries are used to determine the areas where the Bighorn Sheep hunts listed in the 'Washington's Big Game Hunting Seasons and Regulations ' pamphlet will be carried out.63 years ago
- These polygons represent the spatial position for special Deer Hunts in Washington state as described in the rules and regulations presented in the "Washington's Big Game Hunting Seasons and Regulations" pamphlet. The polygons conform to the legal descriptions in the the Huntiing Pamphlet and as written into Washington Administrative Code (Section 220-415-010).63 years ago
- These arcs are used to determine where the boundaries are for special Elk Hunts in Washington state as described in the rules and regulations presented in the "Washington's Big Game Hunting Seasons and Regulations" pamplet. The arcs conform to the legal descriptions in the the Huntiing Pamphlet and as written into Washington Administrative Code (Section 220-415-040).63 years ago
- These are the Game Management Unit boundaries of Washington state. These boundaries are used to determine areas where the rules and regulations that are presented in the 'Washington's Big Game Hunting Seasons and Regulations' pamphlet will take effect.63 years ago
- This polygon feature class represents Bighorn Sheep Units in Washington State. These boundaries are used to determine the areas where the Bighorn Sheep hunts listed in the "Washington's Big Game Hunting Seasons and Regulations" pamphlet will be carried out.63 years ago
- Milepost values at one tenth mile increments on mainline state routes derived from the WSDOT 24K Linear Referencing System for Washington State Routes (LRS). This data is updated annually and represents milepost values on the LRS for the year specified in the LRS_Date field.83 years ago
- Milepost values at one mile increments on mainline state routes derived from the WSDOT 24K Linear Referencing System for Washington State Routes (LRS). This data is updated annually and represents milepost values on the LRS for the year specified in the LRS_Date field.83 years ago
- Mapping of Visible Surface Water (VSW), or water features not concealed by other objects (i.e., tree canopy, bridges, etc.), is an important component of landcover models. VSW is not intended to represent a full hydrography or show connectivity, like other available water datasets – like NHD – whose boundaries may include other landcover types (i.e., shrubs, trees, etc.). Each feature has been visually verified and given attributes by an analyst. This dataset is also unique in that it reflects surface water for a single year - 2017. A variety of funding sources acquired between 2019 and 2023 aided the completion of the dataset for the entire state of Washington. More information on the dataset, current data coverage, and applications can be found on our website: https://hrcd-wdfw.hub.arcgis.com/. Tip: Try using the filter options on the data tab to limit your download to a single County or WRIA. The filtered download can take a substantial amount of time to initiate, so it may be necessary to download the full dataset if the filter option does not work.83 years ago
- WDFW cartography staff create map content designed to inform map viewers where certain types of recreation opportunities are promoted on WDFW Wildlife Areas. This layer is created from WDFW parcel data using parcel attributes to define where these targeted recreation opportunities exist. There are currently two focused map content areas, one is to support the GoHunt application where hunting opportunities are promoted. The other is used to identify WDFW lands where a Washington Discover Pass is required. The Recreation Access Code, managed in the WDFW_Lands feature class, is used to define which parcels are dissolved into this feature class. Recreation Access Code values that are brought across as a result of a standard definition query are: 1 - Parcels managed within a designated Wildlife Area and not restricted in any way for being displayed on GoHunt or Discover Pass maps; 4 - Parcels designated by the Wildlife Program for exclusion from GoHunt activities; 5 - Parcels designated by the Wildlife Program for exclusion from the Discover Pass. Users of this feature class can use ArcMap definition queries to appropriately display either GoHunt or Discover Pass map content. This feature class displays the finest scale of the Wildlife Area administrative hierarchy that consists of Widlife Area Complexes, Wildlife Areas and Wildlife Area Units. There are several fields in this data that can be used to label maps with the Wildlife Area Unit name.63 years ago
- Vehicle locations include Ambulance (transport) and AID only units. Data includes the number of each vehicle at the location. https://doh.wa.gov/public-health-healthcare-providers/emergency-medical-services-ems-systems63 years ago
- National Highway System Routes are depicted as lines with Route identifiers and route measure attributes. Routes in this featureclass are for Non-state National Highway System Routes within Washington State. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- 2013 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures and total truck percentages for state highway traffic count locations monitored by WSDOT's Transportation Data and GIS Office. Figures represent all directions of travel at the given location.63 years ago
- 2021 estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic volumes along the state highway system. Data represents all directions of travel for the given roadway segment.83 years ago
- 2022 Annual Average Daily Traffic figures for state highway traffic count locations. Data represents all directions of travel for the given location.83 years ago
- For large areas, like Washington State, download as a file geodatabase. Large data sets like this one, for the State of Washington, may exceed the limits for downloading as shape files, excel files, or KML files. For areas less than a county, you may use the map to zoom to your area and download as shape file, excel or KML, if that format is desired.Every summer for approximately the past seventy years, an insect and disease aerial detection survey has been flown of all the forested acres of Washington state (except where noted in the digital data by large 'NF' (not flown) areas). This survey is a cooperative effort between the U.S. Forest Service and the WADNR with two different flight observers each sketching a two mile swath out their side of the plane. The primary mission of the survey is to record recently killed and defoliated groups of trees throughout the state, and to continually build a historical record of these trends. The vast majority of damage found is caused by insect and disease damage agents; however, trees killed by early spring feeding of black bears or by events such as winter storms, fires, floods and landslides are recorded as well. Current defoliation can be detected as soon as the affected foliage changes color that year. However, whole tree mortality is not current since only flagged trees (i.e., trees which have a bright red, orange, or yellow foliage color) are recorded. This means that trees killed the year of the survey will not have changed color yet and so a one year lag time results. Since only this distinctive color or "signature" of the tree can be seen. It is an educated guess as to the causal agent. We therefore use ground surveys to reinforce our estimates as much as possible. Example: When bear damage is spotted while surveying, a polygon is drawn on the map of the size and location of the damage. The polygon is then labeled with the appropriate damage agent (i.e. Bear) and the number of trees affected rounded to the nearest five. No vertical data is recorded.83 years ago
- 2022 estimated Annual Average Daily Traffic volumes along the state highway system. Data represents all directions of travel for the given roadway segment.83 years ago
- Emergency Response Boundaries have been extracted from the WA (Enhanced) E911 system. They represent the response boundaries of emergency service providers across Washington State. Includes individual layers for Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Fire Services (Fire), and Law Enforcement Services (Law).63 years ago
- Emergency Response Boundaries have been extracted from the WA (Enhanced) E911 system. They represent the response boundaries of emergency service providers across Washington State. Includes individual layers for Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Fire Services (Fire), and Law Enforcement Services (Law).63 years ago
- This is a compilation of feature services and map services published by WSDOT to provide cities and counties access to state transportation data for general planning purposes. See the description of each individual feature or map service for more information:Boundaries - Includes city, county, and tribal land political boundaries as well as urban growth and regional transportation planning organization boundaries. Planning - Includes metropolitan planning areas, sketch corridors, and other informative layers to assist in future planning.Projects - Includes ongoing WSDOT projects such as Connecting Washington and the 2019 Project Delivery Plan. Roadway - Includes several layers depicting anything on might see on a WSDOT roadway.Multimodal - Includes other modes of transportation such as railway, ferry, and transit. Demographic - Includes environmental heath disparities layer with many more layers soon to come. Environmental - Includes environmental data such as uncorrected fish passages, pollinator habitats, and climate impact vulnerability. This web map is currently under development and subject to change without notice. Please contact Carter Timmerman, WSDOT Planning Policy & Implementation Office, at Carter.Timmerman@wsdot.wa.gov, if you have any questions about the WSDOT Community Planning Portal. The datasets used in this map are intended as general reference layers for geographic information systems at the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). 23 years ago
- Local Agency Public Roads (LAPR) are depicted as lines with Route identifiers and measures. Divided roads where identified are noted as increasing "i" and decreasing "d". This dataset is still under development. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- Functional Class Routes are depicted as lines with Route identifiers and route measure attributes. Routes in this featureclass are for Non-State Arterials and Collector routes within Washington State. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- Polygons represent the Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs) planning area boundaries, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO's) Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) boundaries, and MPO MPAs that are designated as Transportation Management Areas (TMA's). MPOs are responsible for transportation planning within the MPA. RTPOs are responsible for growth management compliance within their planning areas and the development and adoption of regional transportation plans.83 years ago
- Polygons represent the Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs) planning area boundaries, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO's) Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) boundaries, and MPO MPAs that are designated as Transportation Management Areas (TMA's). MPOs are responsible for transportation planning within the MPA. RTPOs are responsible for growth management compliance within their planning areas and the development and adoption of regional transportation plans.83 years ago
- Polygons represent the Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs) planning area boundaries, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO's) Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) boundaries, and MPO MPAs that are designated as Transportation Management Areas (TMA's). MPOs are responsible for transportation planning within the MPA. RTPOs are responsible for growth management compliance within their planning areas and the development and adoption of regional transportation plans.83 years ago
- This dataset identifies exits along interstate routes in Washington State. Please direct questions about this dataset to: TransportationGISDataSteward@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- Polygons delineate general areas served by Washington State public water systems. Data is updated Monday mornings. Check the "Data updated:" date in the Details section. Metadata dates are not automatically updated.63 years ago
- The ‘Dig once’ concept consists of policies and procedures that minimize the number and scale of excavations when installing telecommunication infrastructure in the highway right of way. This application portrays ‘dig once’ opportunities that represent WSDOT projects on a six-year planning horizon. The project data for the map will be updated annually and is a snapshot of project data that is subject to change. If you have any questions about the data, please email Broadband.Utilities@wsdot.wa.gov. If you're having trouble viewing these services, please email OnlineMapSupport@wsdot.wa.gov.23 years ago
- This application displays point locations with links to PDF documents that illustrate the layout of state route interchanges. With this dataset you can locate, view and print drawings of state highway interchange areas, couplets and other select locations, in pdf format. The drawings are not drawn to scale. The dataset and the associated PDF documents are updated through state highway construction contracts, subsequent on-site inspections and input from WSDOT staff.If you have any questions about this data, please contact Lou Baker, Roadway Geometric Supervisor - Lou.Baker@wsdot.wa.gov - (360) 570-2361. Attribute Definitions:Web Link - Links to the interchange pdf document on the InternetInterchange Description – Describes the name of the interchangeRoute Identifier – Defines the state route number of the interchangeLatitude – Geographic latitude coordinate of the interchangeLongitude - Geographic longitude coordinate of the interchange23 years ago
- The 2023 Project Delivery Plan (“Plan”) is a six-year list of projects that are prioritized and programmed for delivery. The investment strategies for the six-year list of projects are based on performance-based analyses within Programs and Sub-Programs with a ten-year planning horizon. The Plan aligns with WSDOT’s performance-based approach to transportation decision-making.83 years ago
- The 2023 Project Delivery Plan (“Plan”) is a six-year list of projects that are prioritized and programmed for delivery. The investment strategies for the six-year list of projects are based on performance-based analyses within Programs and Sub-Programs with a ten-year planning horizon. The Plan aligns with WSDOT’s performance-based approach to transportation decision-making.83 years ago
- Data last updated May 5, 2022. * A polygon layer of land-related rights and interests that are or have been held by the Washington State Park and Recreation Commission. Each record represents one legal instrument. Land-related rights that have expired or have been relinquished are included unless they were relinquished before 02-01-2003. View this layer in conjunction with Land Reductions to see the current extent of lands owned or managed by Washington State Parks. Any land with a polygon in the Land Reductions layer is no longer owned or managed by State Parks.63 years ago
- This feature class shows where WDFW has completed inventory and assessment surveys of highway water crossing structures within WSDOT transportation improvement projects since January 2015.83 years ago
- This app and associated layers of data are provided for the purpose of illustrating the challenges and complexity of work required to correct fish passage barriers under Washington State highways. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) makes no guarantee concerning the data's content, accuracy, completeness, or the results obtained from queries or use of the data, including the underlying base maps. The data supporting this app are from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). The data do not represent exhaustive inventories, but are compilations of knowledge from field biologists that are updated periodically as knowledge improves. It is important to note that habitats or species may occur on the ground in areas not currently known to those who prepared the data, or in areas for which comprehensive surveys have not been conducted. Site specific surveys are frequently necessary to rule out the presence of priority habitats or species. When planning or designing projects that may affect these sites, please consider using additional information gathered from field investigations and consultations with WSDOT, WDFW or other professional biologists.Application Contact Information: Garrett Fuelling, GIS Analyst (fuellig@wsdot.wa.gov)Katrina Keleher, Fish Passage Data Steward (kelehek@wsdot.wa.gov)23 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) buildings. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.83 years ago
- Points depict the locations of the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) sites. GPS data was collected for both state-owned and leased facilities used by the WSDOT.83 years ago
- Input datasets:Washington Department of Ecology: Case Culverts (2015); WRIA (2000)Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife: Case Culverts (2015)Washington Department of Natural Resources: Case Culverts (2015); Non-DNR Major Public Lands (2014)Washington Department of Parks: Case Culverts (2015)Washington Department of Transportation: Case Culverts (2015)23 years ago
- Input datasets:Washington Department of Ecology: CityUGA (2013); Washington State outline (1994)Washington Department of Transporation: Tribal Lands (2013)Washington Department of Natural Resources: NDMPL (2014); DNR Managed Lands (2014)U.S. Fish and WIldlife Service: FWSApproved (2014)63 years ago
- 3 years ago
- Input datasets:Washington Department of Ecology: HUC-12; Water Well Logs (2015-01-13)23 years ago
- These data represent the documented intertidal spawning habitat for Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) and Surf smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus), plus the in the shallow subtidal and intertidal spawning habitat of Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii), in western Washington's marine waters. Also displayed are Pacific herring pre-spawner holding areas. Forage fish survey beaches are also displayed. Sand lance, surf smelt and Pacific herring are collectively referred to as forage fish. They are important prey for many species of mammals, birds and fish, including salmon. Sand lance and surf smelt spawn in the upper intertidal zone of beaches comprised of mixed sand and gravel. These fine-grained spawning substrates are susceptible to nearshore development where substrate coarsening may reduce available habitat. Herring deposit their eggs on marine vegetation: eelgrass and various algae, in the shallow subtidal and intertidal zone generally at tidal elevations from +3 feet to -20 feet Mean Low Low Waterline (MLLW). The accurate representation of forage fish spawning habitat and delivery of those data to public sources is necessary for the conservation of these species. Data for this downloadable are updated intermittently; this version was extracted from the system of record to include data through August, 2019. These data require a thorough understanding of the methods of collection to understand how to best by used in an analysis; please contact Phil Dionne or Kirk Krueger prior to using these data in an analysis. Contact info: Phil DionnePhillip.Dionne@dfw.wa.gov(360) 902-2641 Kirk KruegerKirk.Krueger@dfw.wa.gov(360) 902-260463 years ago
- These data represent the documented intertidal spawning habitat for Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) and Surf smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus), plus the in the shallow subtidal and intertidal spawning habitat of Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii), in western Washington's marine waters. Also displayed are Pacific herring pre-spawner holding areas. Forage fish survey beaches are also displayed. Sand lance, surf smelt and Pacific herring are collectively referred to as forage fish. They are important prey for many species of mammals, birds and fish, including salmon. Sand lance and surf smelt spawn in the upper intertidal zone of beaches comprised of mixed sand and gravel. These fine-grained spawning substrates are susceptible to nearshore development where substrate coarsening may reduce available habitat. Herring deposit their eggs on marine vegetation: eelgrass and various algae, in the shallow subtidal and intertidal zone generally at tidal elevations from +3 feet to -20 feet Mean Low Low Waterline (MLLW). The accurate representation of forage fish spawning habitat and delivery of those data to public sources is necessary for the conservation of these species. Data for this downloadable are updated intermittently; this version was extracted from the system of record to include data through August, 2019. These data require a thorough understanding of the methods of collection to understand how to best by used in an analysis; please contact Phil Dionne or Kirk Krueger prior to using these data in an analysis. Contact info: Phil DionnePhillip.Dionne@dfw.wa.gov(360) 902-2641 Kirk KruegerKirk.Krueger@dfw.wa.gov(360) 902-260463 years ago
- These data represent the documented intertidal spawning habitat for Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) and Surf smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus), plus the in the shallow subtidal and intertidal spawning habitat of Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii), in western Washington's marine waters. Also displayed are Pacific herring pre-spawner holding areas. Forage fish survey beaches are also displayed. Sand lance, surf smelt and Pacific herring are collectively referred to as forage fish. They are important prey for many species of mammals, birds and fish, including salmon. Sand lance and surf smelt spawn in the upper intertidal zone of beaches comprised of mixed sand and gravel. These fine-grained spawning substrates are susceptible to nearshore development where substrate coarsening may reduce available habitat. Herring deposit their eggs on marine vegetation: eelgrass and various algae, in the shallow subtidal and intertidal zone generally at tidal elevations from +3 feet to -20 feet Mean Low Low Waterline (MLLW). The accurate representation of forage fish spawning habitat and delivery of those data to public sources is necessary for the conservation of these species. Data for this downloadable are updated intermittently; this version was extracted from the system of record to include data through August, 2019. These data require a thorough understanding of the methods of collection to understand how to best by used in an analysis; please contact Phil Dionne or Kirk Krueger prior to using these data in an analysis. Contact info: Phil DionnePhillip.Dionne@dfw.wa.gov(360) 902-2641 Kirk KruegerKirk.Krueger@dfw.wa.gov(360) 902-260463 years ago
- 3 years ago
- The 39 WA counties are organized into 8 regions. Status and risk assessment dashboard is available here https://www.coronavirus.wa.gov/what-you-need-know/county-status-and-safe-start-application-process63 years ago
- When a natural disaster or animal disease outbreak causes widespread animal mortality, rapid response and disposal are critical. Washington State Dept. of Agriculture (WSDA) has developed this geodatabase to help identify some of the possible carcass disposal options that may be available during animal mortality events. <o:p></o:p> In the event of a Foreign Animal Disease (FAD) outbreak, the USDA FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal document provides guidance on choosing and using the best disposal methods for a range of situations.<o:p></o:p> The data displayed on this map includes landfills, rendering plants, pet crematoriums, and incinerators (each symbolized by a different color), along with attributes of each (viewed by clicking on each point). There are three additional layers identifying boundaries of Washington conservation districts, local health jurisdictions and solid waste collection company boundaries. Transportation and disposal of animal carcasses in Washington State must comply with federal, state, and local requirements, including local health department regulations. <o:p></o:p> WSDA does not regulate the facilities included in this map and the data does not represent all potential disposal options in the state. During emergency situations and natural disasters, other disposal options might be identified on a case-by-case basis. Consult with Washington State departments of Agriculture and Ecology to help determine the best methods for carcass disposal options during these scenarios. <o:p></o:p>23 years ago
- County parcels closed to harvesting. Also displayed on the Commercial Shellfish Map Viewer here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/oswpviewer/index.html63 years ago
- Webmap for viewing WDFW Salvage Permits - Public View (August 2020 to Present).The records shown in this mapping app were created by members of the public who have salvaged deer or elk meat and have submitted the information required for a WDFW Salvage Permit. See the WDFW Salvage webpage for more information or to create a new permit. The fields displayed in this public view are limited to location and animal details. These details may have been updated by WSDOT or WDFW staff. Period of this data is from August 2020 to present.A rule adopted by the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission in 2016 allows people to legally salvage deer and elk carcasses in the state. The rule specifically applies to deer and elk killed by motor vehicles. Only elk – not deer – may be salvaged in Clark, Cowlitz, and Wahkiakum counties, because federal laws prohibit handling endangered Columbian white-tailed deer in southwest Washington. See WAC 220-400-040 for salvage rule details.23 years ago
- Technical documentation of the map can be viewed here: https://doh.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-07/311-011-EHD-Map-Tech-Report_0.pdf?uid=634dcf4aec2b5What is new with Version 2 of the EHD map?311-013_EHD-Map-Report-Summary (wa.gov)63 years ago
- Technical documentation of the map can be viewed here: https://doh.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-07/311-011-EHD-Map-Tech-Report_0.pdf?uid=634dcf4aec2b563 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.503 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- This layer represents the percent householders spend on housing costs. It uses ACS table DP04 Housing Characteristics. There are three categories under " Selected Monthly Costs as as percentage of household income" for households with mortgages, without mortgages and rentals. Percentages are presented for households spending great than 30 percent of their income on housing costs. A detailed description is available here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal#!q0=474263 years ago
- Washington Department of Natural Resources Districts. These areas are administrative subunits of a Washington Department of Natural Resources Region.WA DNR Districts MetadataDownload Link93 years ago
- The NDMPL (Washington State Non-Department of Natural Resources Major Public Lands) data contains ownership parcels for Federal, State (excluding WA DNR), County and City lands within the State of Washington. It also includes Tribal administrative boundaries. The NDMPL data layer is a polygon dataset and does not contain arc attribute information for ownership boundaries. This data is not connected to WA DNR's Cadastre layers (these data include WADNR ownership, Public Land Survey System and other cadastral data). As updates are made to Cadastre layers, they may not be reflected in NDMPL.WA Major Public Lands MetadataClick to downloadThis layer has updated October 2021. 93 years ago
- Click for MetadataClick for downloadService URL: https://gis.dnr.wa.gov/site3/rest/services/Public_Boundaries/WADNR_PUBLIC_Cadastre_OpenData/MapServer/2The Legal Description spatial layer covers the entire upland area of the State of Washington and consists of often overlapping areas that provide the structure and building blocks for the delineation of parcels of land, a parcel being briefly described as a portion of land identified for purpose of ownership, encumbrance, taxation or governmental administration. Legal Description areas are referred to in written legal descriptions used in the conveyance of parcels. In the Public Land Survey states, of which most non-colonial states including Washington are counted, the most widely recognized legal description area is called a Section. Normally there are 36 Sections in a Township, which is another legal description area. In Washington (and in Oregon) many early land claims took the form of Donation Land Claims, which are, like Sections, confined to being a part of a Township. Tracts, which are used by federal surveys to denote irregular areas where the claim to ownership is based on bona fide rights, and Protracted Blocks, which are a buffer between surveyed areas and areas of unsurveyed (protracted) Sections, are two additional subdivisions of Townships. Sections were not normally subdivided, except in theory, by the federal surveys. The subdivisions of Sections performed by county and local surveyors, using the federal design or schema for section subdivisions, are also part of the Legal Description layer. The fabric of Townships, Sections and their subdivisions, Donation Land Claims, Tracts and Protracted Blocks comprise what is known as the Public Land Survey System (PLSS). These PLSS surveys are referred to as Rectangular Surveys, due to their characteristic orientation to true meridian and to the normally square-like character of the areas encompassed. Other irregular federal surveys are included in the Legal Description layer. These include Mineral Surveys, Homestead Entry Surveys, Townsites and non-rectangular Indian Allotments. Under the authority of Counties and Cities many local subdivisions of the PLSS have been created and are included in the Legal Description Layer. Local subdivisions include the streets, blocks and lots that are common in urban and suburban environments.WA Legal Descriptions Metadata93 years ago
- Assignment of LTS ranking to WA state highway segments was undertaken to aid in efforts to analyze high-level systemic safety and user acceptance of state highways for active transportation users. This data was also intended to inform high-level prioritization of active transportation improvements. Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) data rank highway segments from 1 to 4 based on roadway characteristics, with LTS 1 being most suited to active travel. LTS 1 was deemed suitable for all ages and abilities by WSDOT. LTS 2 is considered suitable for most active travelers. LTS 3 and 4 represent functional gaps in active transportation networks that present systemic safety issues and likely deter use of active modes. The data provided is not a substitute for detailed investigation of a location when specific investment decisions are being considered. The specific characteristics of locations with the same LTS rankings could vary considerably. It is important to note that an LTS 1 or 2 location might have additional, unmeasured characteristics that reduce its presumed suitability for active travel.Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) was described in the 2021 WSDOT Active Transportation Plan (ATP) with methodology outlined in Appendix D. This data updates the data and methods used for the ATP with additional considerations based on:Furth, P. G., Putta, T. V., & Moser, P. (2018). Measuring low-stress connectivity in terms of bike-accessible jobs and potential bike-to-work trips: A case study evaluating alternative bike route alignments in northern Delaware. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1159. The current methodology assigns LTS rankings to roadway segments based on a combination of posted speed, traffic volume, and number of travel lanes. In addition, the presence of bike lanes of 5’ or greater was used to generate Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (BLTS) rankings. Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress (PLTS) was calculated using the presence of sidewalks as indicated in WSDOT enterprise sidewalk data. Ramp segments are included in the dataset with a default LTS ranking of 999. This ranking indicates that all ramps are to be considered high LTS (3 or 4) unless a manual evaluation of the roadway characteristics indicates otherwise. Datasets were not available that would enable ramp rankings to be determined systematically based on posted speed, traffic volume, and number of travel lanes, however a manual review of many ramp configurations across the state indicated that most ramps present LTS concerns.For additional information regarding ranking methodology or other questions about WSDOT’s Level of Traffic Stress dataset, contact: Brian.D.Wood@wsdot.wa.gov.83 years ago
- This feature class represents the routes that were used for the Route Directness Index calculation. These routes were generated by submitting the begin and end points of each RDI_Transect to the Esri routing service with a Walking travel mode. The service returns a route of the shortest pedestrian path between the two points. The routing service is dependent on the Esri network data available when the service was accessed in June 2022.The Route Directness Index (RDI) is a ratio that compares the straight-line (crow-flies) distance across a barrier and between two points to the actual distance imposed by the network of paths available to a traveler. RDI data is particularly relevant to pedestrian and/or bicyclist trips due to the extra time, physical energy, and exposure to weather out of direction travel creates. Research indicates that pedestrians are especially sensitive to out of direction travel and Broach, 2016, found that "to avoid an additional unsignalized arterial crossing, a pedestrian would be willing to go over 70 meters (230 feet) farther via an alternate path." This finding suggests that route directness is relevant to considerations of both utility and safety with respect to active travel. A complete discussion of route directness, including potential applications to decision making, can be found Washington State Multimodal Permeability Pilot, August 2021.RDI can be analyzed at different scales. A high-level analysis of RDI can address questions that compare population centers across the state or consider whether the RDI values are generally similar within a given population center or tend to vary in different portions of a population center. High level data could be combined with other statewide data such as crash data, transit stops, level of traffic stress data, destination data, etc. to analyze potential correlations. High level RDI data is less useful for analyzing a particular crossing location or recommending solutions to address high RDI values. A more detailed analysis is likely required when questions involve corridor studies or project evaluations. Detailed location information can refer to key destinations and crossing locations that are not captured using higher level network maps.The lowest RDI is 1 because a trip between those points can be made directly along an existing roadway. The actual methodology analyzed hypothetical trips where the start and end points were about a quarter mile apart relative to a straight line. In such a situation, an RDI of 2 would mean the trip is twice the distance it might otherwise be, or about one-half mile. Although one-half mile is not particularly far, the RDI is independent of the actual distance. We might start further down the road and if the RDI remained a 2 our trip distance would be twice as long as it could have been. The RDI thus measures the real or perceived burden or travel cost incurred by a person walking or bicycling. An RDI of 2 was selected as the threshold where that travel cost makes it increasingly unlikely that an active travel trip would be completed. The “design vehicle” when selecting that threshold was a walking pedestrian. Selecting an RDI of 2 was an attempt to balance observed travel behavior and the realities of existing crossing opportunities along the state highway system. In addition, since this analysis used about a quarter-mile spacing between test destinations, an RDI of 2 corresponds to the one-half mile maximum distance transit planners assume a pedestrian will be willing to walk to catch a bus or train. (FHWA, Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit, 2013) So with respect to multimodal trips, RDIs greater than 2 might make transit less attractive.83 years ago
- This feature class represents the transects that were used for the Route Directness Index calculation. These lines were generated along the increasing state routes as represented by the 12/31/2021 WSDOT LRS. Transects were only generated within Population Centers as defined by the 2021 Active Transportaiton Plan. Every 250 feet along the route a transect was created perpendicular to the route extending 500 feet on each side of the route. The end points of each transect were then used to calculate the direct distance between the endpoints and were used to generate the shortest walking route between the endpoints.The Route Directness Index (RDI) is a ratio that compares the straight-line (crow-flies) distance across a barrier and between two points to the actual distance imposed by the network of paths available to a traveler. RDI data is particularly relevant to pedestrian and/or bicyclist trips due to the extra time, physical energy, and exposure to weather out of direction travel creates. Research indicates that pedestrians are especially sensitive to out of direction travel and Broach, 2016, found that "to avoid an additional unsignalized arterial crossing, a pedestrian would be willing to go over 70 meters (230 feet) farther via an alternate path." This finding suggests that route directness is relevant to considerations of both utility and safety with respect to active travel. A complete discussion of route directness, including potential applications to decision making, can be found Washington State Multimodal Permeability Pilot, August 2021.RDI can be analyzed at different scales. A high-level analysis of RDI can address questions that compare population centers across the state or consider whether the RDI values are generally similar within a given population center or tend to vary in different portions of a population center. High level data could be combined with other statewide data such as crash data, transit stops, level of traffic stress data, destination data, etc. to analyze potential correlations. High level RDI data is less useful for analyzing a particular crossing location or recommending solutions to address high RDI values. A more detailed analysis is likely required when questions involve corridor studies or project evaluations. Detailed location information can refer to key destinations and crossing locations that are not captured using higher level network maps.The lowest RDI is 1 because a trip between those points can be made directly along an existing roadway. The actual methodology analyzed hypothetical trips where the start and end points were about a quarter mile apart relative to a straight line. In such a situation, an RDI of 2 would mean the trip is twice the distance it might otherwise be, or about one-half mile. Although one-half mile is not particularly far, the RDI is independent of the actual distance. We might start further down the road and if the RDI remained a 2 our trip distance would be twice as long as it could have been. The RDI thus measures the real or perceived burden or travel cost incurred by a person walking or bicycling. An RDI of 2 was selected as the threshold where that travel cost makes it increasingly unlikely that an active travel trip would be completed. The “design vehicle” when selecting that threshold was a walking pedestrian. Selecting an RDI of 2 was an attempt to balance observed travel behavior and the realities of existing crossing opportunities along the state highway system. In addition, since this analysis used about a quarter-mile spacing between test destinations, an RDI of 2 corresponds to the one-half mile maximum distance transit planners assume a pedestrian will be willing to walk to catch a bus or train. (FHWA, Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit, 2013) So with respect to multimodal trips, RDIs greater than 2 might make transit less attractive.83 years ago
- This feature class represents the points that were used for the Route Directness Index calculation. These points were generated along the increasing state routes as represented by the 12/31/2021 WSDOT LRS. Points were only generated within Population Centers as defined by the 2021 Active Transportaiton Plan. Every 250 feet along the route a transect was created perpendicular to the route extending 500 feet on each side of the route. These points represent the midpoint of each transect. The Route Directness Index (RDI) is a ratio that compares the straight-line (crow-flies) distance across a barrier and between two points to the actual distance imposed by the network of paths available to a traveler. RDI data is particularly relevant to pedestrian and/or bicyclist trips due to the extra time, physical energy, and exposure to weather out of direction travel creates. Research indicates that pedestrians are especially sensitive to out of direction travel and Broach, 2016, found that "to avoid an additional unsignalized arterial crossing, a pedestrian would be willing to go over 70 meters (230 feet) farther via an alternate path." This finding suggests that route directness is relevant to considerations of both utility and safety with respect to active travel. A complete discussion of route directness, including potential applications to decision making, can be found Washington State Multimodal Permeability Pilot, August 2021.RDI can be analyzed at different scales. A high-level analysis of RDI can address questions that compare population centers across the state or consider whether the RDI values are generally similar within a given population center or tend to vary in different portions of a population center. High level data could be combined with other statewide data such as crash data, transit stops, level of traffic stress data, destination data, etc. to analyze potential correlations. High level RDI data is less useful for analyzing a particular crossing location or recommending solutions to address high RDI values. A more detailed analysis is likely required when questions involve corridor studies or project evaluations. Detailed location information can refer to key destinations and crossing locations that are not captured using higher level network maps.The lowest RDI is 1 because a trip between those points can be made directly along an existing roadway. The actual methodology analyzed hypothetical trips where the start and end points were about a quarter mile apart relative to a straight line. In such a situation, an RDI of 2 would mean the trip is twice the distance it might otherwise be, or about one-half mile. Although one-half mile is not particularly far, the RDI is independent of the actual distance. We might start further down the road and if the RDI remained a 2 our trip distance would be twice as long as it could have been. The RDI thus measures the real or perceived burden or travel cost incurred by a person walking or bicycling. An RDI of 2 was selected as the threshold where that travel cost makes it increasingly unlikely that an active travel trip would be completed. The “design vehicle” when selecting that threshold was a walking pedestrian. Selecting an RDI of 2 was an attempt to balance observed travel behavior and the realities of existing crossing opportunities along the state highway system. In addition, since this analysis used about a quarter-mile spacing between test destinations, an RDI of 2 corresponds to the one-half mile maximum distance transit planners assume a pedestrian will be willing to walk to catch a bus or train. (FHWA, Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit, 2013) So with respect to multimodal trips, RDIs greater than 2 might make transit less attractive.83 years ago
- Sargassum muticum is an introduced alga that is widely distributed in Washinton State saltwater areas. This dataset summarizes Sargassum occurrence using data from the ShoreZone Inventory. Sargassum is classified as being patchy (less than 50%) or continuous (greater than 50%) along each unit of shoreline (an area with similar physical characteristics). The majority of the shoreline is described by line data, polygon features exist in some areas with extensive shallows. The ShoreZone Inventory includes all saltwater shorelines statewide. It was completed between 1994 and 2000 using aerial videography collected at low tide. For more information on the inventory, see http://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/aquatics/aquatic-science/nearshore-habitat-inventory93 years ago
- This line layer from the ShoreZone Inventory divides the shoreline in 8 shoreline types based on substrate type. This classification is a simplification of the BC Shoreline Classification.The ShoreZone Inventory characterizes several physical parameters within shoreline segments. The majority of the shoreline is described by line data. Polygon features exist in some areas with extensive shallows. The ShoreZone Inventory includes all saltwater shorelines statewide. It was completed between 1994 and 2000 using aerial videography collected at low tide. For more information on the inventory, see http://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/aquatics/aquatic-science/nearshore-habitat-inventory93 years ago
- Kelp is a type of brown algae with recognized ecological value and management protections. This dataset summarizes occurrence of non-floating kelp (stalked or prostrate) species using data from the ShoreZone Inventory. It is classified as being patchy (less than 50%) or continuous (greater than 50%) along each unit of shoreline (an area with similar physical characteristics). The ShoreZone Inventory includes all saltwater shorelines statewide. It was completed between 1994 and 2000 using aerial videography collected at low tide. For more information on the inventory, see http://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/aquatics/aquatic-science/nearshore-habitat-inventory83 years ago
- This dataset includes all locations where manual counts have been collected as part of the Washington Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project beginning in 2008. The Washington State Documentation Project occurs annually in the early fall. Bicycle and pedestrian usage of specific intersections in cities throughout the State are counted and documented, similar to the National Documentation Project. WSDOT and the Cascade Bicycle Club enlist the support of volunteers and other organizations to benchmark the numbers of people bicycling and walking on trails, bike lanes, sidewalks, and other facilites across the state. For more information on the Washington State Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project, please visit http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/bike/Count.htm83 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- SWIFD is the Statewide Washington Integrated Fish Distribution, presented as a linear featureclass based on WA single stream identifiers (LLID). The Statewide Washington Integrated Fish Distribution (SWIFD) dataset is a single National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) event layer for the state of Washington. Within the Treaty Tribes and Washington State co-management area, the Northwest Indian Fisheries (NWIFC) and Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) collaborated to create a single data schema and to combine fish distribution data. The NWIFC and WDFW combined data area is within the boundaries of Washington State Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA) 01 -- 23. This is the western Washington region including the western Washington Cascades, the Puget Sound, the Hood Canal, the Strait of Juan de Fuca, and the Olympic peninsula from the Nooksack River in the north (WRIA 01) to the Chehallis River (WRIA 22/23) in the South. The data schema remains the same for Washington state fish distribution data outside of the co-management area, but all fish distribution data outside of the co-management area is supplied by WDFW. The foundational fish distribution dataset is an event table that contains attributes for each species of fish, anadromous and resident, that have previously been mapped by either NWIFC or WDFW. This event layer maps to the ROUTED 1:24,000-scale version of NHD for Washington state, using NHD ReachCodes as the route identifier, and relative 0-100 linear measures within each reach/route. SWIFD events are in the USGS Hydrologic Event Management (HEM, http://nhd.usgs.gov/tools.html#hem) table format and HEM is used to update and maintain the event tables. Each individual fsh species/run contains information on verification of the upper extent of fish distribution, life history, and habitat use. In the final dataset all the individual fish species/run distributions are stacked onto the NHD reaches, so a given stream reach with 6 unique species/runs will have 6 features associated with it. Usually a definition query is applied to this featureclass to display a single species at a time. The event table structure of the dataset does allow groups of species/runs to be integrated via the use of event overlays. Users should also pay attention to the DISTTYPE_DESC field to ensure they are displaying the appropriate records for their purposes. In particular, there are confirmed absence records for certain species that should not be displayed as occupied stream habitat. SWIFD is developed by dissolving the foundational NHD ReachCode event table SWIFD_2HEM_evts by the LLID and the specific fish record attributes: LLID;LLID_STRM_NAME;SPECRCODE;SPECIESRUN;SPECCODE;SPECIES;RUN_TIME;RUNTIME_DESC;DIST_TYPE;DISTTYPE_DESC;USE_TYPE;USETYPE_DESC;LIFE_HIST;LIFEHIST_DESC;83 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- These maps delineate the entire Puget Sound shoreline by geomorphic type. The primary purpose of the mapping was to identify feeder bluffs, eroding shorelines that are important to maintaining nearby beaches. Knowledge of the distribution of these features can be used by local planners and resource agencies to better manage Puget Sound shorelines. The study emphasized mapping of coastal bluffs, but also extended to a wide range of other coastal landforms, including rocky shores, river deltas, and small lagoons and estuaries. This mapping project is described in the following report, available from the Department of Ecology: MacLennan., A. Johannessen, J.W., Williams, S.A., Gerstel, W., Waggoner, J.F., and Bailey, A., 2013, Feeder Bluff Mapping of Puget Sound, prepared by Coastal Geologic Services, Bellingham, for Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia WA, 117 pp and map folio. See https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/parts/1406016part1.pdf.63 years ago
- This dataset shows the general locations of Regional Biodiversity Areas and Corridors (BAC) for the Columbia Plateau as defined by WDFW’s Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) program. This dataset was derived from data generated by the Washington Connected Landscapes Project: Analysis of the Columbia Plateau Ecoregion. For its purpose as a tool to flag regions with high-quality, intact wildlife habitat and corridors, this data is Best Available Science according to the criteria provided in WAC 365-195 for the Growth Management Act (GMA, RCW 36.70A). 93 years ago
- This dataset provides information on fixed-route transit stops for the State of Washington as of 8/15/22. Stop data was extracted from General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) data. Because GTFS data is typically created and managed by each individual transit agency, WSDOT cannot guarantee the accuracy of these data.Most data points are provided direct from GTFS feeds according to the specification at https://gtfs.org/. The stop_id field has been prepended with a code for each agency to ensure every stop has a distinct stop_id.Some fields are added describing the frequency level of service at each stop, based on the levels and methodology described in the WSDOT Frequent Transit Service Study (more information at https://engage.wsdot.wa.gov/frequent-transit-service-study/)Please send comments and questions to gtfs@wsdot.wa.gov83 years ago
- This dataset provides information on fixed-route transit route lines for the State of Washington as of 8/15/22. Stop data was extracted from General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) data. Because GTFS data is typically created and managed by each individual transit agency, WSDOT cannot guarantee the accuracy of these data.Most data points are provided direct from GTFS feeds according to the specification at https://gtfs.org/. The route_id field has been prepended with a code for each agency to ensure every route has a distinct route_id.Please send comments and questions to gtfs@wsdot.wa.gov83 years ago
- The land base of the Pacific Northwest includes large areas that could support hardwoods or a hardwood component. Often, however, site index, the most commonly used measure of a site's potential productivity, is not available for red alder as other species occupy the site. In order to make site-specific management decisions, the suitability for red alder production can be assessed by geographic and topographic position, soil moisture and aeration during the growing season, and soil fertility and physical condition (Harrington 1986). The difficulty of weighing these physical factors to determine site suitability appears to be a major impediment to the establishment of red alder plantations. Additionally, forest managers are lacking a planning tool that would consider red alder in the landscape for long term management plans. To assist forest managers in their planning and site selection efforts, we developed a GIS-based Red Alder Site Suitability Model based on physical criteria identified by Harrington (1986) as most influential on the productivity of red alder. The major components of the model are elevation, topographic position, slope, aspect, soil type, and soil depth. The model was implemented in a GIS (ESRI ArcPro v.3.0) raster environment with topographic position, slope, aspect, and elevation derived from a 10-meter digital elevation model (DEM), using lidar data where available. Topographic position class of valley, lower slope, flat slope, middle slope, upper slope, or ridgetop was derived from the topographic position index (TPI) using standard deviation thresholds as described by Weiss (2001). The soil texture and depth were derived from Washington DNR’s corporate soil data layer. Each pixel was then classified and assigned one of four suitability categories: High, Medium, Low, and No Potential. Because of the level of spatial detail of the model, forest managers can assess the potential of red alder management on any given site, such as planned timber harvest. Additionally, the model can be used at a larger scale, i.e. planning for future product diversification in a watershed.The model has been cursorily field-verified on existing red alder plantations and compared with locations and site index of natural red alder stands for DNR's forest inventory system. Initial results indicate that the model is accurate in identifying sites with potential for intensive red alder management. Local knowledge will still be an important factor in the application of the model. Frost pockets or areas susceptible to other physical damage such as ice damage (i.e. within the east wind drafts of the Columbia River Gorge) are not identified in by this model. The usefulness of this model will be determined by the experience of the field staff over time. References:Harrington, Constance A. 1986. A method of site quality evaluation for red alder. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-192. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 22 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-192Weiss, A. 2001. Topographic position and landforms analysis. In Poster presentation, ESRI user conference, San Diego, CA (Vol. 200). http://www.jennessent.com/downloads/tpi-poster-tnc_18x22.pdf83 years ago
- Locations and campsite numbers of campsites within Washington State Parks. Data is not complete; development of this dataset is ongoing. For more information, and to make on-line campsite reservations, see https://washington.goingtocamp.com/.Attribute Definitions:· Name - The name of the campsite. The name is most often represented as a number, but sometimes has additional characters.· ParkName - Name of the Washington State Park the campsite is located in.· ParkCode - The five-digit code representing the Washington State Park.· Join - A concatenation of Name and ParkCode, used for tablejoining purposes.· Keylink - A concatenation of Name and ParkName, used for tablejoining purposes.· Filter - Flags the campsite as inactive. Campsites are assumed to be active, depending on the time of year, if this field contains 'active' or is blank.· SourceNotes - Describes the source of the campsite locations and names. This is most often taken from the maps on the Washington State Parks online campsite reservation system (https://washington.goingtocamp.com/).To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- Last updated May 5, 2022. * This data layer depicts the current boundaries for WA State Parks, and properties owned by WSPRC (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission). Property types include State Park, State Park Conservation Area, State Park Heritage Site, State Park Property, State Park Trail, Historical State Park, and Marine State Park. Data is revised monthly or more frequently; however, errors and inaccuracies may exist in the data. This layer is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- Non-Motorized winter recreation trails in Washington State. Non-motorized Sno-Parks are only open to winter recreation sports such as cross-country skiing, dog sledding, snowshoeing, and snow play. Washington State Parks Winter Recreation Program manages more than 3,000 miles of groomed snowmobile trails, 300 miles of cross-country trails and five Snow Play Sno-Parks. Altogether, Washington State has more than 120 Sno-Parks, located on State Parks, U.S. Forest Service and Department of Natural Resources lands. The Winter Recreation Program manages Sno-Parks (cleared parking areas) in close proximity to groomed and backcountry trails.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).AttributesDifficultyTrail Difficulty level.ConditionCondition of trail.CommentGeneral notes/comments.GroomfundsGrooming funds for trail.KilometerTrail length in kilometers.Dist_miTrail distance in miles.AreaCodeArea code trail falls under.TrailUsageTrail usage type.63 years ago
- The Facility Inventory and Condition Assessment Program (FICAP) system is used effectively to monitor and plan for facility preservation, renovation and construction activities at Washington State Parks. The facility inventory GIS dataset provides the location of built structures owned or managed by the Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission - showing name, condition, size, construction date & cost. Also includes links to photos of each facility in the attribute table. Data is updated annually. Last updated August 2022. To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- Areas upland from surface water sources used for public drinking water supplies. The areas are limited to 30 miles upstream from the intakes. If you need the entire catchment areas, contact DOH. This layer is used in the Source Water Assessment Protection application https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/swap/index.html. Data is updated Monday mornings. Check the "Data updated:" date in the Details section. Metadata dates are not automatically updated.63 years ago
- This layer depicts roads within Washington State Parks, and information about their physical characteristics. Data is maintained by State Parks staff. Public roads are included where they pass through the park, to show where public roads lead to the entrances of parks. Development of this dataset is ongoing.Attribute Definitions: Type - Defines the type of roadway. Types include Camp Loop, Park Road, Private Road, Public Road, and Service Road. Park - The name of the WA State Park that contains the road. RoadName - Name of the park road, where available. Comments - General comments. Miles - The length of a road segment, in miles, as calculated in GIS (ArcGIS Pro). Surface - Road surface type, where known. Gravel, paved. To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- GIS layers symbolizing various data in the WSPMS database The surface type of the preservation unit, generally ACP (Asphalt Concrete Pavement), BST (Bituminous Surface Treatment) or PCCP (Portland Cement Concrete Pavement).A brief user guide is located at: https://data.wsdot.wa.gov/geospatial/DOT_WSPMS/WSPMSFeatureClassFieldDescription.docx83 years ago
- GIS layers symbolizing various data in the WSPMS database This featureclass has a text field with values Very Poor, Poor, Fair, Good and Very Good indicating the lowest category of PSC or RCN, Rutting and IRI.A brief user guide is located at: https://data.wsdot.wa.gov/geospatial/DOT_WSPMS/WSPMSFeatureClassFieldDescription.docx.83 years ago
- Land classification is an element of State Parks' Classification and Management Plan process (CAMP). Classifications determine what recreational uses and types of developments are appropriate in areas under park management. In general, sensitive areas are classified restrictively and allow only low-intensity uses and development of minor facilities. Less sensitive areas are classified to allow higher-intensity uses and more extensive facilities development. LandClassificationOriginal records CAMP designations at the time that the State Parks & Recreation Commission approved the plan. For further information on the classes and allowed structures and activities, see Washington State Parks Land Classification System (http://parks.state.wa.us/documentcenter/view/9843). Note: Some areas outside of current park boundaries are included within the Land Classification area. These areas are part of the Long-Term Park Boundary (http://parks.state.wa.us/documentcenter/view/9842).To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- The WA State Park system has hundreds of miles of trails, from short interpretive nature walks to challenging long-distance treks. The linework in this layer locates trails, describes their physical characteristics, and enumerates the activities permitted on trails. Completion of linework and attributes is ongoing.For attribute definitions, see Metadata - Fields - Details - Attributes. To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "WSPRC" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- Census tracts with 4, 5, 6 and 10 tier classifications. We'll be adding 2020 data when its available from the USDA or the Census.From Asnake Hailu,The schemes shared in the RUCAGuide.pdf are DOH modified layers, prepared merely for epidemiological purposes [I.e., to delineate geography for a comprehensive epidemiologic assessment, describing rural-urban differences in demographics, health outcomes, risk factors, access to services, and the like.] Those are not as such rural/urban designation tools for census block areas, nor for any of the other geography categories. The files with the DOH modified layers are available at https://doh.wa.gov/public-health-healthcare-providers/rural-health/data-maps-and-other-resources under the sub-county level: Zip Code and Census Tract sub-heading.Please note: those files are essentially a decade old. We were anticipating to update our core products that are on our website, if and when the Federal Office of Rural Health and Policy (FORHP) produces a newer version of RUCA codes based on census 2020. The FORHP customarily contracts with a university for that task. We are three years away from 2020, except there is no update posted on the webpage I am familiar to get the original RUCA delineations. Here is a path where I go to check for the newer version: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-commuting-area-codes/63 years ago
- This GIS data shows the locations of WSDOT fish passage sites in the 2023-2025 fish passage project delivery plan (https://wsdot.wa.gov/construction-planning/protecting-environment/improving-fish-passage/fish-passage-project-delivery-plans). The fish passage project delivery plan incorporates the Legislature’s new revenue funding and communicates WSDOT’s intentions for specific investments in transportation infrastructure. This GIS data is a subset of data compiled and extracted from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) Fish Passage and Diversion Screening Inventory (FPDSI) database. It includes data compiled from several WDFW and non-WDFW fish passage barrier inventory efforts. The Fish Passage project delivery plans are subject to change due to significant project issues and/or new information.83 years ago
- This GIS data shows the locations of WSDOT fish passage sites in the 2025-2027 fish passage project delivery plan (https://wsdot.wa.gov/construction-planning/protecting-environment/improving-fish-passage/fish-passage-project-delivery-plans). The fish passage project delivery plan incorporates the Legislature’s new revenue funding and communicates WSDOT’s intentions for specific investments in transportation infrastructure. This GIS data is a subset of data compiled and extracted from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) Fish Passage and Diversion Screening Inventory (FPDSI) database. It includes data compiled from several WDFW and non-WDFW fish passage barrier inventory efforts. The Fish Passage project delivery plans are subject to change due to significant project issues and/or new information.83 years ago
- This dataset provides geospatial locations and general bridge information for structures Owned By or Managed By WSDOT Bridge Preservation Office (BPO).The WSDOT Bridge Structures (On) layer is a line dataset that represents a bridge/structure that carries a roadway over a feature. If there is a vertical clearance restriction related to the bridge/structure, the minimum clearance will appear in either the MinVertClrncOverDeck or MinVertClrncUnderBridge fields. For more specific and detailed vertical clearance information please use the WSDOT Bridge Vertical Clearance Trip Planner: https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Bridge/Structures/BVCTP.htm (Chrome Browser works best)83 years ago
- This dataset provides geospatial locations and general bridge information for structures Owned By or Managed By WSDOT Bridge Preservation Office (BPO).The WSDOT Bridge Structures (Under) layer is a point dataset that represents a location at which a route crosses beneath a bridge/structure (a bridge/structure that is not represented in the (Bridge Structures (On) dataset) for example: pedestrian bridges, railroad bridges or tunnels. Vertical clearance minimum restrictions for a particular structure will be represented in the MinVertClrncUnderBridge or TunnelMinVertClrncOverRdBy10 fields. For more specific and detailed vertical clearance information please use the WSDOT Bridge Vertical Clearance Trip Planner: https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Bridge/Structures/BVCTP.htm (Chrome Browser works best)83 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- This map service provides general bridge information for all transportation structures within the Washington State Bridge Inventory System (WSBIS) in Washington State. This includes bridges, large culverts, tunnels, pedestrian & railroads passing over state routes, and pedestrian bridges adjacent to state routes on state right of way. The accuracy and completeness of the transportation structure data (including the structure location) are the responsibility of the structure owner. In cases where pedestrian & railroad structures pass over state or local agency routes, this data may be the responsibility of the route owner under the structure. Note that local agencies do not include a complete inventory of pedestrian & railroad structures in local agency rights of way. Please Note: If there is a vertical clearance restriction related to the bridge/structure, the minimum clearance will appear in either the MinVertClrncOverDeck, MinVertClrncUnderBridge or TunnelMinVertClrncOverRdBy10 fields. For more specific and detailed vertical clearance information please use the WSDOT Bridge Vertical Clearance Trip Planner: https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Bridge/Structures/BVCTP.htm(Chrome Browser works best)Reference Document: Criteria for Identifying Bridge Condition Stateshttps://data.wsdot.wa.gov/geospatial/DOT_Bridge/WSDOTBridgeConditionStates_Criteria.pdf#page=1Reference Document: Attribute Definition Guidehttps://data.wsdot.wa.gov/geospatial/DOT_Bridge/WSBIMCodingGuide_Appendix2C_2020.pdfIf you have any questions about this data, please contact George Comstock, Bridge Preservation Office (BPO) - comstog@wsdot.wa.gov-(360) 570-2540. If you're having trouble viewing these services, please email OnlineMapSupport@wsdot.wa.gov.Download individual data sets from https://gisdata-wsdot.opendata.arcgis.com83 years ago
- The agency (Washington State Parks) has mapped habitats of conservation concern (i.e., significance or importance) across most of the park system. This effort is commonly referred to as the Significant Natural Resources geodatabase (SNR). Below are a series of questions and answers that briefly describe the SNR and its associated metrics. What is the SNR? The SNR is a geodatabase that identifies areas of the park system that support important native habitats. Data comprising the SNR are derived from a number of sources and are believed to reflect the best data currently available related to species and habitats of conservation concern. What is the purpose of the SNR? The SNR serves many purposes, including but not limited to, informing Stewardship of important habitats, threats to them, and priority areas for restoration / protection; Capital Development, Planning, and Operations of areas to avoid when considering projects or planning activities (e.g., metal detecting) that could impact habitats of conservation significance; and, planners of important natural habitats adjacent to our parks that could help to maintain habitat integrity and function within them. How was the SNR developed? Vegetation communities and rare plant surveys have been conducted across 80+% of park uplands during the past two decades (these can be viewed in the Biological Surveys folders for each park on the N drive [N:\Park Information\Park Specific Information]). These surveys, first initiated in 2001 by contact biologists following protocols developed by Parks and the WA DNR Natural Heritage Program (NHP), serve as the foundation for the SNR. Additional habitat data, from sister conservation agencies, are layered atop select attributes collected during the vegetation surveys. The result is a geodatabase of important habitats to conserve across the park system. The full suite of data used in the SNR is noted below. What data comprises the SNR? As noted above, the SNR is comprised of data from the agency’s vegetation surveys and habitat-related data compiled by other government agencies. They are considered to be the most relevant and best datasets to use in the model, which span a range of habitat characteristics and conditions. Specifically, the following geodatabases (metrics) comprise the SNR: 1. State Parks Vegetation Community and Rare Plant Surveys a. Plant Associations (PA) and their Global (G) and State (S) conservation ranks b. Overall Ecological Condition of the PA c. Ecological Systems and their functional sizes d. Old Growth habitats 2. NHP Rare Plants and their G and S ranks 3. WDFW Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) rare species habitats and their conservation status 4. Washington Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Working Group landscape integrity model 5. National Wetlands Inventory to map habitats close to water.63 years ago
- Washington's State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP, 2015) is a comprehensive plan for conserving the state's fish and wildlife and the natural habitats on which they depend. It is part of a nationwide effort by all 50 states and five U.S. territories to develop conservation action plans and participate in the State and Tribal Wildlife Grants (SWG) Program. These data layers represent both the observed species range, as well as, the modeled potential species range for Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN), as identified in Washington’s State Wildlife Action Plan, 2015. Species range is defined as the geographic area, in which a species regularly occurs within Washington, including areas used for breeding as well as important distinct foraging, wintering, or migration areas, where appropriate. Range does not include accidental, infrequent, or peripheral areas that are disconnected from the regularly occurring area or wintering or migration areas that are generally broad and nonspecific. SWAP SGCN species ranges (observed and potential) are spatially represented, using USGS watershed boundaries (USGS hydrologic units - HUCS) at various scales. Potential suitable habitat distribution data for each of the SCGN species was derived from “Ecological Systems” data. Ecological Systems were developed by NatureServe to provide a mid-scale ecological classification, for uplands and wetlands, useful for conservation and environmental planning. The Washington State SWAP data is organized as a collection of individual species ranges (observed and potential range polygons), as well as, potential habitat distribution raster files - that have been compressed (into a ZIP files) for download. No map services exist for these data at this time. 23 years ago
- Noxious weed survey dataset for WA State Parks. WA State Parks has a legal responsibility to control or eradicate noxious weeds on its property. The state noxious weed list includes non-native species that degrade significant quantities of wildlife habitat, increase the risk of wildfire, endanger public health, and impact the long-term health of natural, agricultural, and recreation lands.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).AttributesCollectorName or initials of the person that collected the data.data_sourceThe name of the agency that the Collector/Observer is affiliated with.date_of_surveyDate of the surveyParkName of the Washington State Park that noxious weed survey was completed at.location_descriptionGeneral description of the area that noxious weeds were found at.SurveyIntensityIntensity of the noxious weed survey.SoilDisturbanceLevel of soil disturbance found at the survey site, if applicable.FireDisturbanceLevel of fire disturbance found at the survey site, if applicable.common_nmA drop down menu of common names for noxious weeds species provided by the WA State Noxious Weed Board. Users can input several noxious weed species.Species_CoverageApproximate coverage area for each individual noxious weed species found in survey area.other_weed_nameOther weeds/exotics found on site that are not included in the drop down menu in the common_nm field.TotalCoverageTotal coverage area for all noxious weed species found in survey area.TotalDistributionClassification of the spatial distribution pattern of noxious weeds in the survey area.TreatmentPriorityLevel or priority that treatment should be given to weeds in the survey area, ranging from high to low.commentsGeneral notes/comments.63 years ago
- Noxious weed survey dataset for WA State Parks. WA State Parks has a legal responsibility to control or eradicate noxious weeds on its property. The state noxious weed list includes non-native species that degrade significant quantities of wildlife habitat, increase the risk of wildfire, endanger public health, and impact the long-term health of natural, agricultural, and recreation lands.AttributesCollectorName or initials of the person that collected the data.data_sourceThe name of the agency that the Collector/Observer is affiliated with.date_of_surveyDate of the surveyParkName of the Washington State Park that noxious weed survey was completed at.location_descriptionGeneral description of the area that noxious weeds were found at.SurveyIntensityIntensity of the noxious weed survey.SoilDisturbanceLevel of soil disturbance found at the survey site, if applicable.FireDisturbanceLevel of fire disturbance found at the survey site, if applicable.common_nmA drop down menu of common names for noxious weeds species provided by the WA State Noxious Weed Board. Users can input several noxious weed species.Species_CoverageApproximate coverage area for each individual noxious weed species found in survey area.other_weed_nameOther weeds/exotics found on site that are not included in the drop down menu in the common_nm field.TotalCoverageTotal coverage area for all noxious weed species found in survey area.TotalDistributionClassification of the spatial distribution pattern of noxious weeds in the survey area.TreatmentPriorityLevel or priority that treatment should be given to weeds in the survey area, ranging from high to low.commentsGeneral notes/comments.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- The Sitka Spruce boundary layer was created to satisfy the Forest Practices Emergency Rules of March 20, 2000. The Franklin and Dyrness, 1973, "Generalized vegetation map of Oregon and Washington" (at a scale of approximately 1:2,000,000) was digitized to create the current sitka spruce zone. According to Forest Practices Rules, if the uppermost point of perennial flow cannot be identified with standard observations (see board manual, section 23), then type 4 Waters begin at a point along the channel where the contributing basin area is at least 13 acres in the Sitka Spruce Zone.93 years ago
- This layer replaces master2000 for the previous datum NAD27. The mastertic tics were recreated with new tic ids that are based on a hashing of their state plane coordinates. The idtics are unique within the last 4 digits for a vicinity of 100,000 feet square. The idtics will be the same for tics at the same location between the two tic sets (so tics don't double up when appended). (For example, a tic with xtic = 2,480,000 and ytic = 360,000 will have a tic id of 02346800 at any of the tic intervals 2000, 5000, 10,000, and 20,000.) Other tic sets have been created that can be moved into covers that follow the same rules for tic ids: master10k, master20k, master50k, master100k, quadtic2_5m, quadtic5m, quadtic7_5m, quadtic10m, quadtic15m, and quadtic30m. The quadtic covers have hashed tic ids based on the geographic coordinate intervals that are used on USGS 7.5, 15, and 30 minute quads93 years ago
- For large areas, like Washington State, download as a file geodatabase. Large data sets like this one, for the State of Washington, may exceed the limits for downloading as shape files, excel files, or KML files. For areas less than a county, you may use the map to zoom to your area and download as shape file, excel or KML, if that format is desired.Abstract:The FP_GIS_FPA_ shapefiles represents Forest Practices Application/Notification (FPA/N) harvest unit boundaries, FPA/N specific tabular data, FPA/N specific Office Checklist tabular data and FPA/N specific stakeholder tabular data. An FPA/N may include harvest activity, forest road activity and aerial chemical spray activity. FPA/N harvest units include timber harvest and salvage sites. FPA/N harvest unit polygons are captured from FPA/N Activity Maps. Attribute data is captured from the FPA/N and associated documents, and may be compiled from many sources.Supplemental_Information: From July 1996 through October 2002, FPSPOLY data was collected in Oracle using the Mapping and Planning System (MAPS). From October 28, 2002 to July 10, 2009, data was collected in Oracle using the Forest Practices Application Review System (FPARS). From July 13, 2009, to the present data is collected in dotNET using FPARSv3.Washington State is divided into two State Plane Zones, north and south. For this data set, north zone data coordinates have been converted to south zone coordinates.103 years ago
- See https://wa-stateparks.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=be76cf1a59dc40c3b655ca746aee5820 for project report and metadata.63 years ago
- Layer depicting the city boundaries and areas within Washington State where Labor and Industries does not conduct electrical inspections.These areas are self-inspected by the municipality or power company in that area.APPLICATION LAYER - DO NOT DELETE63 years ago
- City limit for cities in Washington State. The boundary lines represent the borders of the city limits for all the incorporated cities residing in Washington State. Data used for this layer was downloaded from the Washington State Department of Ecology's open data portal. The original data consisted of all the incorporated cities, and the urban growth areas in Washington State. ACTIVE PUBLIC SERVICE - DO NOT DELETE63 years ago
- Locations of commercial shellfish harvest sites (shellfish harvesters, shellstock shippers, and shucker packers) in Washington State. Also displayed on the Commercial Shellfish Map Viewer here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/oswpviewer/index.html Relay and wet storage sites are not included.63 years ago
- Shellfish biotoxin closure zones in Puget Sound and Washington coastal areas. The areas also support the Internet biotoxin bulletin applications at https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/biotoxin/biotoxin.html and https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/oswpviewer/index.html63 years ago
- Locations of fecal coliform sampling stations in Washington State. Also displayed on the Commercial Shellfish Map Viewer here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/oswpviewer/index.html63 years ago
- The boundaries of commercial shellfish growing areas in Washington State. Also displayed on the Commercial Shellfish Map Viewer here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/oswpviewer/index.html63 years ago
- Used by Shellview. Non-parcel areas that are permanently or temporarily closed for shellfish harvesting. Also displayed on the Commercial Shellfish Map Viewer here: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/oswpviewer/index.html63 years ago
- Land classification is an element of State Parks' Classification and Management Plan process (CAMP). Classifications determine what recreational uses and types of developments are appropriate in areas under park management. In general, sensitive areas are classified restrictively and allow only low-intensity uses and development of minor facilities. Less sensitive areas are classified to allow higher-intensity uses and more extensive facilities development. The Land Classification layer records CAMP designations at the time that the State Parks & Recreation Commission approved the plan. For further information on the classes and allowed structures and activities, see Washington State Parks Land Classification System (http://parks.state.wa.us/documentcenter/view/9843). Note: Some areas outside of current park boundaries are included within the Land Classification area. These areas are part of the Long-Term Park Boundary (http://parks.state.wa.us/documentcenter/view/9842).13 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- Washington Large Fire dataset represents large fires in Washington State typically over 100 acres, but smaller perimeters have been included when data is available. Collecting accurate large fire perimeters is a coordinated effort between federal, state and local agencies. The Northwest Coordination Center in Portland, Oregon heads this effort by compiling daily fire perimeters from the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) ftp site during fire season and at the end of each calendar year. The purpose of this data is to provide consistent spatial data throughout Washington for management, planning or analysis involving fire history. Fire perimeter polygons represent final fire perimeters provided by jurisdictional agency, local agencies or Incident Management Teams assigned to the fire. Final products for each polygon are maintained at the local level to track the area affected by fire. This dataset dates back to 1973, some data may be missing or inaccurate. DNR works in coordination with other agencies to make every attempt to get complete and correct data at the end of each fire season.93 years ago
- (ZIP File - Data for the Private Lands Hunting Opportunities (PLHO) is updated on the first of every month.)The Private Lands Hunting Opportunities (PLHO) Hunt Area Access, Hunt Area Boundary, and Safety Zone feature classes provide area and point location, project enrollment information, huntable game, and other general descriptive data for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) participating private lands hunting opportunity areas. WDFW's Private Lands Biologists input contractual information, hunting opportunity, and locational information into internal databases from which a denormalized table is generated and joined to the spatial features. For more information see: http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/hunting_access/private_lands/.23 years ago
- This data set contains processed survey data for the Midwinter Aerial Seabird Surveys conducted in Puget Sound area from December through February annually. This is a zipped (compressed) file geodatabase containing GIS data and must be downloaded, unzipped and viewed in using GIS software such as ArcMap or ArcGIS Pro. This includes avian observations, survey routes and surveyed areas, as well as supplemental layers involved in subsequent statistical analysis such as depth-basin analysis strata, excluded areas, species look-up and crosswalk tables, and a table of abundance estimates. An interactive web-map displaying abundance estimates derived from this data is viewable here.This geodatabase contains the following datasets: PSEMP_Analysis_Strata (polygon), Pocket_estuaries (polygon), PSEMP_Survey_Observations (point), PSEMP_SurveyRoutes (polyline), PSEMP_SurveyArea (polygon), Species (table), PSEMP_Group (table), SpeciesPSEMP_Group (table), AbundanceEstimates (table), PSEMP_LogSurvey_OverlapWithin (polygon).23 years ago
- OFM Small Area Estimate Program (SAEP) population and housing estimates for select Census geographies.63 years ago
- OFM Small Area Estimate Program (SAEP) population and housing estimates for select Census geographies.63 years ago
- OFM Small Area Estimate Program (SAEP) population and housing estimates for select Census geographies.63 years ago
- OFM Small Area Estimate Program (SAEP) population and housing estimates for select Census geographies.63 years ago
- OFM Small Area Estimate Program (SAEP) population and housing estimates for select Census geographies.63 years ago
- OFM Small Area Estimate Program (SAEP) population and housing estimates for select Census geographies.63 years ago
- OFM Small Area Estimate Program (SAEP) population and housing estimates for select Census geographies.63 years ago
- OFM Small Area Estimate Program (SAEP) population and housing estimates for select Census geographies.63 years ago
- 3 years ago
- For detailed up-to-date information on how this measure was derived, view the notes for this measure on the Washington Tracking Network: https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/wtn/WTNPortal/#!q0=363213 years ago
- This map service layer shows the seagrass species present at each site sampled (2000-2015) by a monitoring program covering greater Puget Sound. The monitoring is conducted by the Washington Department of Natural Resources. More recent data (2000-2017) is included in the complete dataset that is available for download.93 years ago
- This map service layer contains the site boundary polygons used for monitoring seagrasses in the marine nearshore of greater Puget Sound. Monitoring is conducted by the Washington Department of Natural Resources. The site polygons cover all the potential native seagrass habitat for the entire monitoring study area. The underlying data are included in the complete dataset that is available for download.93 years ago
- These polygons represent the spatial position for special Deer Hunts in Washington state as described in the rules and regulations presented in the 'Washington's Big Game Hunting Seasons and Regulations' pamplet. The polygons conform to the legal descriptions in the the Huntiing Pamphlet and as written into Washington Administrative Code (Section 220-415-010)63 years ago
- These polygons represent the spatial position for special Elk Hunts in Washington state as described in the rules and regulations presented in the "Washington's Big Game Hunting Seasons and Regulations" pamphlet. The polygons conform to the legal descriptions in the the Hunting Pamphlet and as written into Washington Administrative Code (Section 220-415-040)63 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- Noxious weed survey dataset for WA State Parks. WA State Parks has a legal responsibility to control or eradicate noxious weeds on its property. The state noxious weed list includes non-native species that degrade significant quantities of wildlife habitat, increase the risk of wildfire, endanger public health, and impact the long-term health of natural, agricultural, and recreation lands.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).AttributesCollectorName or initials of the person that collected the data.data_sourceThe name of the agency that the Collector/Observer is affiliated with.date_of_surveyDate of the surveyParkName of the Washington State Park that noxious weed survey was completed at.location_descriptionGeneral description of the area that noxious weeds were found at.SurveyIntensityIntensity of the noxious weed survey.SoilDisturbanceLevel of soil disturbance found at the survey site, if applicable.FireDisturbanceLevel of fire disturbance found at the survey site, if applicable.common_nmA drop down menu of common names for noxious weeds species provided by the WA State Noxious Weed Board. Users can input several noxious weed species.Species_CoverageApproximate coverage area for each individual noxious weed species found in survey area.other_weed_nameOther weeds/exotics found on site that are not included in the drop down menu in the common_nm field.TotalCoverageTotal coverage area for all noxious weed species found in survey area.TotalDistributionClassification of the spatial distribution pattern of noxious weeds in the survey area.TreatmentPriorityLevel or priority that treatment should be given to weeds in the survey area, ranging from high to low.commentsGeneral notes/comments.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).63 years ago
- This line feature class represents Moose Areas and Hunts in Washington State. These boundaries are used to determine the areas where the Moose hunts listed in the "Washington's Big Game Hunting Seasons and Regulations" pamphlet will be carried out.63 years ago
- This polygon feature class represents Moose Areas and Hunts in Washington. These boundaries are used to determine the areas where the Moose hunts listed in the "Washington's Big Game Hunting Seasons and Regulations" pamphlet will be carried out.63 years ago
- This Line feature class represents the boundaries of the Mountain Goat Hunt Areas in Washington. These boundaries are used to determine the areas where the Mountain Goat hunts listed in the 'Washington's Big Game Hunting Seasons and Regulations' pamphlet will be carried out.63 years ago
- This polygon feature class represents Mountain Goat Hunt Areas in Washington State. These boundaries are used to determine the areas where the Mountain Goat hunts listed in the "Washington's Big Game Hunting Seasons and Regulations" pamphlet will be carried out.63 years ago
- 3 years ago
- Washington State Department of Agriculture regulates dairy farm compliance with state water quality and food safety law. This regulation includes regular inspections of dairy production fields and facilities. The milking facilities, which generally represent the heart of the operation, are mapped for internal and public use. This dataset includes all active dairy milking facilities. It includes information about the spatial distribution of dairies in Washington State and information about each business itself.23 years ago
- Used to evaluate the statewide distribution of retail locations and plan outreach efforts.23 years ago
- Used to evaluate the statewide distribution of clinic locations and plan outreach efforts.23 years ago
- 3 years ago
- 3 years ago
- 3 years ago
- 3 years ago
- 3 years ago
- 3 years ago
- 3 years ago
- 3 years ago
- This layer shows the dates and times of images taken in 2015 (1 foot resolution) as part of the Statewide Imagery Consortium.63 years ago
- This layer shows the dates and times of images taken in 2016 (6 inch resolution) as part of the Statewide Imagery Consortium.63 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- PHS On The Web (POTW) is a web-based, interactive mapping tool for citizens, landowners, local governments, developers, conservation groups and others to find basic information about known locations of Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) in Washington State. PHS is a source of best available science that can inform local planning activities, development projects, conservation strategies, incentive programs, and numerous other applications. The three GIS layers provided in this file geodatabase are the layers displayed in the POTW (Public) online map application. The three layers are scheduled to be updated on the first Monday of each month. These three GIS layers are: WDFWPHSPlusPublicLine, WDFWPHSPlusPublicPoint, and WDFWPHSPlusPublicPolygon. In these three layers, sensitive species are not shown as mapped (as a point, line, or polygon) but the locations are masked as a Section (one square mile), Quarter Township (nine square miles), or Township (thirty-six square miles) polygons.Sensitive species and habitat information are defined in WDFW Policy 5210. Priority habitats and species locations deemed sensitive by WDFW are not publicly displayed beyond a certain resolution (e.g., township or section) due to an increased risk of human interference. Sensitive data is exempt from public disclosure under the Public Records Act; this term is defined in RCW 42.56.430. Sensitive species are any wildlife species likely to become endangered or threatened; this term is defined in WAC 200-200-100. Qualifying landowners, university researchers, government agencies, and tribes may request PHS maps that contain this sensitive data.Since this GIS layer contains non-sensitive species information, it can be used without limitations, but please acknowledge the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) as the source of this information. Please do not distribute this data, instead refer others to WDFW. If you have any questions about this layer, you can contact PHS at this email address: phsproducts@dfw.wa.gov with a subject line of the email being "POTW Public Dataset Question".Please note, although mapped PHS data is useful for determining the general extent of priority species or habitats, the department has not surveyed the entire state of Washington. PHS map data is meant to serve as a starting point to identify priority habitats and species. It is not meant to replace or preempt more detailed field-based, site-level mapping. Site-specific surveys are usually needed to rule out the presence of priority habitats or species. PHS maps do not provide an official agency determination of the potential impacts to fish and wildlife of a specific project.Additional ResourcesPHS On The Web Application: https://geodataservices.wdfw.wa.gov/hp/phs/PHS On the Web Map Service: https://geodataservices.wdfw.wa.gov/arcgis/rest/services/PHSOnTheWeb/PHSOnTheWebPublic/MapServer23 years ago
- Washington Congressional Districts 2022, as amended by adoption of HCR 4407 on February 8th 2022. Made into law IAW RCW 44.05.Contains 10 features representing each of Washington States 10 Congressional Districts.Projected to NAD 1983 HARN Washington State Plane South US Feet63 years ago
- 3 years ago
- 3 years ago
- 3 years ago
- WDFW maintains a centralized database of fish passage, diversion screening, fish use, and habitat information from inventory efforts conducted throughout Washington State. WDFW’s Fish Passage and Diversion Screening Inventory (FPDSI) database is a main data source for planning fish passage projects.23 years ago
- Input datasets: Washington State Department of Natural Resources: Transportation 2011 (roads only); Non-DNR Major Public Lands (2014) Washington State Department of Ecology: NHD 2014 (not pipeline, coastline, or Grays Harbor artificial path); HUC-12 Watersheds63 years ago
- Input datasets: Washington State Department of Natural Resources: Transportation 2011 (roads only); Non-DNR Major Public Lands (2014) Washington State Department of Ecology: NHD 2014 (not pipeline, coastline, or Grays Harbor artificial path); HUC-12 Watersheds23 years ago
- Input datasets: Washington State Department of Natural Resources: Transportation 2011 (roads only); Non-DNR Major Public Lands (2014) Washington State Department of Ecology: NHD 2014 (not pipeline, coastline, or Grays Harbor artificial path); HUC-12 Watersheds63 years ago
- Input datasets: Washington State Department of Natural Resources: Transportation 2011 (roads only); Non-DNR Major Public Lands (2014) Washington State Department of Ecology: NHD 2014 (not pipeline, coastline, or Grays Harbor artificial path); HUC-12 Watersheds23 years ago
- The Forest Practices Application Mapping Tool is a Web Application designed for Forest Lands Owners to get the information necessary to review and make Forest Practices Applications through the Forest Practices Division of the Washington Department of Natural Resources.23 years ago
- **NOTE: This feature service has replaced "School Districts - Washington State".**This feature service depicts the boundaries of the nine Educational Service Districts in Washington State. Educational Service Districts are nine regional educational support agencies partnering with the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) to provide essential services for school districts and communities and to help OSPI implement legislatively-supported education initiatives.Attribute definitions with alias in [ ] and source in ():OrganizationId [Organization Id] - Unique organization code for database purposes (EDS)ESDCode [ESD Code] - Educational Service District unique code (EDS)ESDNum [ESD Number] - Educational Service District numberESDName [ESD Name] - Educational Service District name (EDS)ShortName [Short Name] - Abbreviated ESD name (Calculated)PhysicalAddress [School Physical Address]- Physical Address of ESD (EDS)MailingAddress [School Mailing Address] - Mailing Address of ESD (EDS)Website [Website] - ESD website URL (Edited)63 years ago
- This web app allows the user to view which Washington State public recreation lands have ADA accessible recreational features. Categories of ADA accessible features include Camping, Hiking, Restrooms, Trails, and many others. Users can either click on a ADA information point (represented by a colored conifer tree icon) and get a listing of ADA accessible features, or run a query that selects properties that meet the chosen criteria.23 years ago
- Mobile map of Alta Lake State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 11, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Anderson Lake State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 12, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Belfair State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 13, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Birch Bay State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 13, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Bogachiel State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 12, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Bottle Beach State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 13, 2021.13 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Bridle Trails State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 13, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Brooks Memorial State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 16, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Bay View State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 16, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Camano Island State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 16, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Federation Forest State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 17, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Flaming Geyser State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 17, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Griffiths-Priday State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 17 2021.13 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- Estimates of persons with disabilities or other support needs by Census tract in Washington State. DSHS prepared estimates of persons with disabilities or other support needs in Washington Census tracts using data from the US Census Bureau’s 2012 American Community Survey. The estimates were prepared for DSHS and the Washington Department of Health to assist in emergency preparedness planning for Washington jurisdictions. Only 5-year estimates (2008-2012) are available for Census tracts. Estimated counts, percentages, margins of error (MOEs) of counts and percentages by Census tract have been calculated for the following characteristics: Persons with Disabilities, Hearing Difficulty, Vision Difficulty, Cognitive Difficulty, Ambulatory Difficulty, Self-Care Difficulty, Independent Living Difficulty, Persons with Two or More Disabilities, Persons with Disabilities and in Poverty, Persons in Groups Quarters, Households Without Vehicles, Persons Speaking English less than "Very Well," Persons in Poverty.Lifecycle status: ProductionPurpose: enable open access to DSHS dataDSHS Data Security: Category 1 - PublicLast Update: 4/24/2015Update Cycle: As neededFGDC Metadata - For Layer: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_EstimatesbyCensusTract.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Adult Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_AdultEstimates.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Senior Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_SeniorEstimates.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Youth Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_YouthEstimates.xmlImportant: DSHS reserves the right to alter, suspend, re-host, or retire this service at any time and without notice. This is a map service that you can use in custom web applications and software products. Your use of this map service in these types of tools forms a dependency on the service definition (available fields, layers, etc.). If you form any dependency on this service, be aware of this significant risk to your purposes. You might consider mitigating your risk by extracting the source data and using it to host your own service in an environment under your control. Typically, DSHS Enterprise GIS staff will provide notification of changes via the Comments RSS capability in ArcGIS Online. You may subscribe to the RSS feed that publishes comments to monitor any planned and notified changes.43 years ago
- Mobile map of Joemma Beach State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 17, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Kopachuck Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 17, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Lake Sammamish State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 18, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Leadbetter Point State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 18, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Lime Kiln Point State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 18, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Lyons Ferry State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 18, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Mount Pilchuck State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 18, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Mount Spokane State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 18, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Nisqually State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 18, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Nolte State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 20, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Obstruction Pass State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 20, 202113 years ago
- Mobile map of Olallie State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 20, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Palouse Falls State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 20, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Peshastin Pinnacles State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 20, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Rockport State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 20, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Saint Edward State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 20, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of South Whidbey State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 23, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Squak Mountain State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 23, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Squilchuck State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 23, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Tolmie State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 23, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Westport Light State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 23, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Conconully State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 23, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Maryhill State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 25, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Saltwater State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 30, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Jarrell Cove State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 2, 2021.13 years ago
- **NOTE: This feature service has replaced "School Districts - Washington State".**This data was compiled by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) to provide boundary and attribute information for the 295 Public School Districts in the State of Washington. The polygons are our best representation of current district boundaries based on legal descriptions, county, and other available GIS data. Users should contact the local school district(s) to confirm the interpretation of district boundaries in questions.Attribute definitions with alias in [ ] and source in ():OrganizationId [Organization Id] - Unique organization code for database purposes (EDS)ESDCode [ESD Code] - Educational Service District unique code (EDS)ESDNum [ESD Number] - Educational Service District numberESDName [ESD Name] - Educational Service District name (EDS)LEACode [LEA Code] - Local Educational Authority/District unique code (EDS)LEAName [LEA Name] - Local Educational Authority/District name (EDS)ShortName [Short Name] - Abbreviated District name (Calculated)PhysicalAddress [School Physical Address]- Physical Address of school (EDS)MailingAddress [School Mailing Address] - Mailing Address of school (EDS)AdministratorName [Administrator Name] - School Administrator's name (EDS)AdministratorEmail [Administrator Email] - School Administrator's email (EDS)Phone [Phone] - District phone (EDS)Website [Website] - District website URL (Edited)County [County] - Primary District County (EDS)Counties [All Counties] - All Counties with areas in District (GIS)CongressionalDistricts [Congressional Districts] - All Congressional Districts with areas in District (EDS)LegislativeDistricts [Legislative Districts] - All Legislative Districts with areas in District (EDS)Type [Type] - Type of School District: Public School District, Charter District, or Tribal Compact (EDS)TransportationRegion [Transportation Region] - Transportation Coordinator Regions63 years ago
- Mobile map of Fields Spring State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 13, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Grayland Beach State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 14, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Ike Kinswa State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 15, 2021.13 years ago
- Washington Department of Natural Resource Open Data Plan. A plan by Washington Department of Natural Resources to provide GIS Data to the Public through Web Sites such as this. What we are doing and what we plan to do.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Illahee State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 16, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Kanaskat-Palmer State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 16, 2021.13 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- Estimates of persons with disabilities or other support needs by Census tract in Washington State. DSHS prepared estimates of persons with disabilities or other support needs in Washington Census tracts using data from the US Census Bureau’s 2012 American Community Survey. The estimates were prepared for DSHS and the Washington Department of Health to assist in emergency preparedness planning for Washington jurisdictions. Only 5-year estimates (2008-2012) are available for Census tracts. Estimated counts, percentages, margins of error (MOEs) of counts and percentages by Census tract have been calculated for the following characteristics: Persons with Disabilities, Hearing Difficulty, Vision Difficulty, Cognitive Difficulty, Ambulatory Difficulty, Self-Care Difficulty, Independent Living Difficulty, Persons with Two or More Disabilities, Persons with Disabilities and in Poverty, Persons in Groups Quarters, Households Without Vehicles, Persons Speaking English less than "Very Well," Persons in Poverty.Lifecycle status: ProductionPurpose: enable open access to DSHS dataDSHS Data Security: Category 1 - PublicLast Update: 4/24/2015Update Cycle: As neededFGDC Metadata - For Layer: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_EstimatesbyCensusTract.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Adult Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_AdultEstimates.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Senior Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_SeniorEstimates.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Youth Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_YouthEstimates.xmlImportant: DSHS reserves the right to alter, suspend, re-host, or retire this service at any time and without notice. This is a map service that you can use in custom web applications and software products. Your use of this map service in these types of tools forms a dependency on the service definition (available fields, layers, etc.). If you form any dependency on this service, be aware of this significant risk to your purposes. You might consider mitigating your risk by extracting the source data and using it to host your own service in an environment under your control. Typically, DSHS Enterprise GIS staff will provide notification of changes via the Comments RSS capability in ArcGIS Online. You may subscribe to the RSS feed that publishes comments to monitor any planned and notified changes.43 years ago
- Estimates of persons with disabilities or other support needs by Census tract in Washington State. DSHS prepared estimates of persons with disabilities or other support needs in Washington Census tracts using data from the US Census Bureau’s 2012 American Community Survey. The estimates were prepared for DSHS and the Washington Department of Health to assist in emergency preparedness planning for Washington jurisdictions. Only 5-year estimates (2008-2012) are available for Census tracts. Estimated counts, percentages, margins of error (MOEs) of counts and percentages by Census tract have been calculated for the following characteristics: Persons with Disabilities, Hearing Difficulty, Vision Difficulty, Cognitive Difficulty, Ambulatory Difficulty, Self-Care Difficulty, Independent Living Difficulty, Persons with Two or More Disabilities, Persons with Disabilities and in Poverty, Persons in Groups Quarters, Households Without Vehicles, Persons Speaking English less than "Very Well," Persons in Poverty.Lifecycle status: ProductionPurpose: enable open access to DSHS dataDSHS Data Security: Category 1 - PublicLast Update: 4/24/2015Update Cycle: As neededFGDC Metadata - For Layer: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_EstimatesbyCensusTract.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Adult Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_AdultEstimates.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Senior Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_SeniorEstimates.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Youth Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_YouthEstimates.xmlImportant: DSHS reserves the right to alter, suspend, re-host, or retire this service at any time and without notice. This is a map service that you can use in custom web applications and software products. Your use of this map service in these types of tools forms a dependency on the service definition (available fields, layers, etc.). If you form any dependency on this service, be aware of this significant risk to your purposes. You might consider mitigating your risk by extracting the source data and using it to host your own service in an environment under your control. Typically, DSHS Enterprise GIS staff will provide notification of changes via the Comments RSS capability in ArcGIS Online. You may subscribe to the RSS feed that publishes comments to monitor any planned and notified changes.43 years ago
- Estimates of persons with disabilities or other support needs by Census tract in Washington State. DSHS prepared estimates of persons with disabilities or other support needs in Washington Census tracts using data from the US Census Bureau’s 2012 American Community Survey. The estimates were prepared for DSHS and the Washington Department of Health to assist in emergency preparedness planning for Washington jurisdictions. Only 5-year estimates (2008-2012) are available for Census tracts. Estimated counts, percentages, margins of error (MOEs) of counts and percentages by Census tract have been calculated for the following characteristics: Persons with Disabilities, Hearing Difficulty, Vision Difficulty, Cognitive Difficulty, Ambulatory Difficulty, Self-Care Difficulty, Independent Living Difficulty, Persons with Two or More Disabilities, Persons with Disabilities and in Poverty, Persons in Groups Quarters, Households Without Vehicles, Persons Speaking English less than "Very Well," Persons in Poverty.Lifecycle status: ProductionPurpose: enable open access to DSHS dataDSHS Data Security: Category 1 - PublicLast Update: 4/24/2015Update Cycle: As neededFGDC Metadata - For Layer: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_EstimatesbyCensusTract.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Adult Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_AdultEstimates.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Senior Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_SeniorEstimates.xmlFGDC Metadata - For Youth Table: http://gis.dshs.wa.gov/metadata/opendata/ACS2012_YouthEstimates.xmlImportant: DSHS reserves the right to alter, suspend, re-host, or retire this service at any time and without notice. This is a map service that you can use in custom web applications and software products. Your use of this map service in these types of tools forms a dependency on the service definition (available fields, layers, etc.). If you form any dependency on this service, be aware of this significant risk to your purposes. You might consider mitigating your risk by extracting the source data and using it to host your own service in an environment under your control. Typically, DSHS Enterprise GIS staff will provide notification of changes via the Comments RSS capability in ArcGIS Online. You may subscribe to the RSS feed that publishes comments to monitor any planned and notified changes.63 years ago
- Motor vehicles are Washington's largest source of air pollution. The Emission Check Program tests factory-installed emission control systems on motor vehicles, and identifies vehicles whose systems are not working properly. This program is estimated to prevent more than 149,000 tons of air pollution in Washington per year. Emission testing is required by federal law in areas that have had problems meeting health-based air quality standards. In Washington, emission testing is required in the urban areas of Clark, King, Pierce, Snohomish, and Spokane counties.Automobile emission check areas are designated by zip code where the vehicle is registered. In Clark County, three zip codes cover only partial areas: 98604 - Except north of NE 279th St.; 98629 - Except east of NE 50th Avenue; 98671 - Except Skamania County. A complete list is available at <http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/air/cars/zip_codes.htm>. More information on automobile emission testing can be found at <http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/air/airhome.html>.63 years ago
- DSHS and the state Health Care Authority (HCA) jointly designated Regional Service Areas (RSAs) in June 2015, following legislative authorization in 2014. RSAs define new geographical boundaries for the state to purchase behavioral and physical health care through managed care contracts. They are not administrative authorities. Behavioral Health Organizations (BHOs) are located within newly formed Regional Service Areas (RSAs). There is one BHO per RSA, except for the Southwest Washington RSA, which has a contract with the Health Care Authority for managed care plans. RSAs join and include contiguous counties, contain at least 60,000 people on Medicaid, possess an adequate number of health care providers, and reflect natural physical and behavioral health service referral patterns. More information on BHOs is available at this link (https://www.dshs.wa.gov/bha/division-behavioral-health-and-recovery/behavioral-health-organizations).Lifecycle status: ProductionPurpose: enable open access to DSHS dataDSHS Data Security: Category 1 - PublicLast Update: 7/7/2016Update Cycle: as neededData Sources: DSHSImportant: DSHS reserves the right to alter, suspend, re-host, or retire this service at any time and without notice. This is a map service that you can use in custom web applications and software products. Your use of this map service in these types of tools forms a dependency on the service definition (available fields, layers, etc.). If you form any dependency on this service, be aware of this significant risk to your purposes. You might consider mitigating your risk by extracting the source data and using it to host your own service in an environment under your control. Typically, DSHS Enterprise GIS staff will provide notification of changes via the "Comments" RSS capability in ArcGIS Online. You may subscribe to the RSS feed that publishes comments to monitor any planned and notified changes.63 years ago
- The Parcel layer consists of parcels that are areas land in which the Department of Natural Resources holds some interest and are located anywhere in the upland area of the State of Washington. Three types of Parcels are currently held in the parcel layer. The number of Parcel types may increase in the future. Ownership Parcels, parcel type code 1, consist of Washington State owned land managed by the Department of Natural Resources. Most ownership parcels are held and managed for the benefit of some trust such as the Common School and Indemnity trust. Of the several parcel types, only Ownership Parcels represent the entire extent of the particular type of land managed by DNR. The other parcel types are incomplete data sets. Disposed Parcels, parcel type code 2, consist of ownership parcels that have been disposed of since July 1, 2007. A very few parcels disposed of prior to that date are also included. Easement Parcels, parcel type code 3, consist of various types of easements acquired for the State by the Department. Some of the Easements are negative easements over land not owned by the State, for example Conservation Easements which remove certain development rights away for the parcel owner. Other Easements are positive rights acquired by the State, such as roadway easements.WA DNR Managed Land Parcels Metadata93 years ago
- Ecology created SMA_Poly_Adopt (also known as SMA_Jurisdiction_Lakes) by selecting appropriate water bodies from the National Hydrographic Dataset "NHDWaterbody.lyr" as maintained by the Department of Ecology.The Shoreline Management Act (SMA) applies to lake sand reservoirs greater than 20 acres in area. The area used to make this determination is defined by a continuous ordinary high water mark and may include vegetated areas as well as open water areas.Lakes over 1,000 acres in area and all associated shorelands are shorelines of statewide significance. Lakes of statewide significance are listed by county in WAC 173-20.Water bodies found to be smaller than the 20-acre minimum will be removed from SMA_Poly_Adopt. Water bodies greater than 20 acres not captured in SMA_Poly_Adopt will be added to it. These changes occur on an irregular basis. See Chapter 173-18-044 WACThe SMA_Jurisdiction_Lakes dataset was resynchronized to the March 2019 version of the NHDhttps://ecology.wa.gov/Water-Shorelines/Shoreline-coastal-management/Shoreline-coastal-planning/Shoreline-Master-Programs63 years ago
- This map shows the general pattern of arsenic contamination from Ruston (Tacoma Smelter Plume) By Census Block Group. With 90% certainty, at least 1 in 10 parcels will have soil arsenic at or above levels shown. Predictions are based on distance and direction from the former Asarco smelter, and on sampling data from forested and other soils undisturbed by development. Actual arsenic levels may vary greatly from parcel to parcel.Disclaimer: Actual arsenic levels may vary greatly from parcel to parcel. Property-specific sampling is necessary to determine the actual amount of arsenic on a given property. How to Sample your own soil - https://ecology.wa.gov/Spills-Cleanup/Contamination-cleanup/Dirt-Alert-program/Soil-samplingPattern and Description of the Tacoma Smelter Plume:There are three major factors to Arsenic deposition (the three D's) but many others exist. 'D'irection- wind rose direction,'D'istance, 'D'isturbanceArsenic tends to exceed state cleanup levels more often than other metals. Lead is the other main contaminant.Arsenic and lead are found mainly in the top six inches of soil.In areas where soil has been moved or turned over, contamination can be deeper.Undisturbed areas, such as forests, tend to have higher levels of contamination.In general, levels are related to distance and direction from the former smelter. Levels decrease with distance and are higher along the dominant north-northeast and south-southwest wind directions.Created a dataset for arsenic(0 to 6 inches sample depth) that had similar study characteristics in the field and lab. Various environmental studies were reviewed because of the size of the study area. Ecology reviewed data from over 130 studies and found 23 studies that had applicable data. Theses studies contained over 22,500 disturbed-residential samples and 1469 undisturbed samples for our analysis.63 years ago
- This map shows the general pattern of arsenic contamination from Ruston (Tacoma Smelter Plume) By Census Block Group. With 90% certainty, at least 1 in 10 parcels will have soil arsenic at or above levels shown. Predictions are based on distance and direction from the former Asarco smelter, and on sampling data from forested and other soils undisturbed by development. Actual arsenic levels may vary greatly from parcel to parcel.Disclaimer: Actual arsenic levels may vary greatly from parcel to parcel. Property-specific sampling is necessary to determine the actual amount of arsenic on a given property. How to Sample your own soil - https://ecology.wa.gov/Spills-Cleanup/Contamination-cleanup/Dirt-Alert-program/Soil-samplingPattern and Description of the Tacoma Smelter Plume:There are three major factors to Arsenic deposition (the three D's) but many others exist. 'D'irection- wind rose direction,'D'istance, 'D'isturbanceArsenic tends to exceed state cleanup levels more often than other metals. Lead is the other main contaminant.Arsenic and lead are found mainly in the top six inches of soil.In areas where soil has been moved or turned over, contamination can be deeper.Undisturbed areas, such as forests, tend to have higher levels of contamination.In general, levels are related to distance and direction from the former smelter. Levels decrease with distance and are higher along the dominant north-northeast and south-southwest wind directions.Created a dataset for arsenic(0 to 6 inches sample depth) that had similar study characteristics in the field and lab. Various environmental studies were reviewed because of the size of the study area. Ecology reviewed data from over 130 studies and found 23 studies that had applicable data. Theses studies contained over 22,500 disturbed-residential samples and 1469 undisturbed samples for our analysis.63 years ago
- We have established a Vessel Sewage No Discharge Zone (NDZ) for Puget Sound and certain adjoining waters. The NDZ is a body of water where boats may not release sewage, whether treated or not. It helps protect public health, water quality, and sensitive resources. The NDZ (Chapter 173-228 WAC) was adopted on April 9, 2018, after a five year public process and approval from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The rule was effective May 10, 2018. However, certain commercial vessels have a five year delay before the rule begins. There is no change for graywater discharges. For more information, visit Ecology's NDZ webpage.63 years ago
- These 10 Ecoregions were created to support mapping and analysis for the Chehalis Basin Strategy Aquatic Species Restoration Plan (ASRP; original document can be found at https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/SummaryPages/1906009.html).For the ASRP, the entire Chehalis Basin was divided into Geospatial Units (GSUs). These GSUs are relatively small areas primarily defined by being a watershed to either a first-order stream or a stream- or river segment. They are used to define inputs to the Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment model (EDT), which is a spatially-aware model primarily used to estimate the impact of interventions on highly mobile aquatic species, such as salmon.The Ecoregions in this dataset were created by combining the smaller GSUs into larger units with similar ecological, geological, and in particular hydrological characteristics. Drainage basins for large and medium river systems, like the Wynoochee, Satsop, Skookumchuck, etc. were preserved intact within single ecoregions. Smaller drainage basins, like the Johns and Humptulips rivers, were combined with other basins to make up larger Ecoregions.Primarily, the Ecoregions were derived to support the EDT salmon model, and the development of restoration scenarios (see 4.2.2.1 of the ASRP Phase 1 document). Questions asked at the Ecoregion level included species distribution, the relative value of different restoration measures, and priority actions for each Ecoregion.The Ecoregions were created by ICF International Inc. in January 2017. See the Chehalis Basin Strategy ASRP Phase 1 document (https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/SummaryPages/1906009.html) for more detail on the derivation of these ecoregions and their use in supporting the ASRP.63 years ago
- An instream flow rule is a flow regime set in state regulation. The legal authority to set instream flows by rule comes from laws passed by Washington State legislature, including:Construction projects in state waters (RCW 77.57.020) Water code (RCW 90.03.247)Minimum water flows and levels (Chapter 90.22 RCW)Water resources act of 1971 (Chapter 90.54 RCW, particularly section 020)Watershed planning (RCW 90.82.080)For background information and related links:https://ecology.wa.gov/Water-Shorelines/Water-supply/Protecting-stream-flowsFor information about specific areas:https://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=173Title 173 WAC, 173-501 to 173-564For information about tribal land designations (reservation and trust) used in this dataset:https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/gispublic/DataDownload/ECY_BND_TribalLands.htm63 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- This data compiled by the Washington Military Department on August 21, 2019. The All Hazards Alert Broadcast (tsunami) Audio v2 Minor Feature Layer represents the decibel level propagation waves of the audio signal from an AHAB siren. The range covers 5 decibels to 130 decibels. Within the dataset the 60 decibel and 70 decibel propagation line represents the lowest level of sound strength that a person could clearly hear the messages issued from an AHAB siren. 70 decibels is coded in yellow to indicate the near lowest level of clear audio. The 60 decibels is coded in red to indicate the cut off established for clear audio.63 years ago
- PHS on the Web is a Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife web-based, interactive map for citizens, landowners, cities and counties, tribal governments, other agencies, developers, conservation groups, and interested parties to find basic information about the known location of Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) in Washington State. PHS is a source of best available science that can inform local planning activities, development projects, conservation strategies, incentive programs, and numerous other land use applications.The species and habitats that appear on the map are informed by WDFWs PHS List. The map displays known locations of priority habitats and species that have been provided to the department by agency biologists and other sources of scientific data about species and habitat locations. Data is updated as new information is gathered and verified in the field. This map should not be considered an exhaustive survey of all fish and wildlife presence.The data displayed on PHS on the Web is for informational purposes only. Before making final decisions about a project or plan using this map, WDFW strongly recommends a field visit by a fish and wildlife biologist or habitat expert to make determinations about species presence, absence, or exact location. The location of species can change over time, not every parcel has been surveyed and biologists add new field observations on a regular basis.Please note: The specific location of some fish and wildlife information is not available on PHS on the Web. These locations deemed “sensitive” by WDFW are not displayed on the map beyond a certain resolution (e.g. Township or Section) due to an increased risk of human interference. Eligible landowners, University researchers, government agencies, tribes and some others may qualify to receive this data. Please visit WDFWs PHS Data Release web page for more information about how to receive sensitive data.23 years ago
- Positional data corrections 9/27/2022 - dataset damagedThis data compiled by the Washington Military Department on August 22, 2019. The All Hazards Alert Broadcasting System (AHAB) data points supply visual depiction of where the siren locations are along the Washington State Coast and some inland waterways. If an actual tsunami event occurs the sirens supply not only audible but visual warnings of the impending danger via a wailing audio sound and an intense blue light for the hearing impaired, which can also cut through fog and is visible from a long distance. The sirens further supply a 4500-watt public address system to relay verbal information to the local populations or play digitally pre-recorded messages. The siren design enables a 360-degree coverage. Has the capability to make test and actual evacuation announcements in English and Spanish (These are pre-recorded on each siren’s installed micro SD card.) Using pre-programmed phrases and words, messages can be created at any control point for such things as ‘Shelter in Place’, and Hazardous Material Notification. Siren positional data is derived from the satellite transponder attached to each siren which derives its location from current GPS satellites deployed by the United States. Attribute Description RTU - Siren reference number Address - Nearest address of where the siren is located Name - Name of the siren LocationReference - Description of where the siren is located in relation to address City - City where the siren is location County - County where siren is located Elevation - Elevation in feet AMSL of the siren location Latitude - Latitude of siren location Longitude - Longitude of siren location Updated: 8/22/201963 years ago
- The agency (Washington State Parks) has mapped habitats of conservation concern (i.e., significance or importance) across most of the park system. This effort is commonly referred to as the Significant Natural Resources geodatabase (SNR). Below are a series of questions and answers that briefly describe the SNR and its associated metrics. What is the SNR? The SNR is a geodatabase that identifies areas of the park system that support important native habitats. Data comprising the SNR are derived from a number of sources and are believed to reflect the best data currently available related to species and habitats of conservation concern. What is the purpose of the SNR? The SNR serves many purposes, including but not limited to, informing Stewardship of important habitats, threats to them, and priority areas for restoration / protection; Capital Development, Planning, and Operations of areas to avoid when considering projects or planning activities (e.g., metal detecting) that could impact habitats of conservation significance; and, planners of important natural habitats adjacent to our parks that could help to maintain habitat integrity and function within them. How was the SNR developed? Vegetation communities and rare plant surveys have been conducted across 80+% of park uplands during the past two decades (these can be viewed in the Biological Surveys folders for each park on the N drive [N:\Park Information\Park Specific Information]). These surveys, first initiated in 2001 by contact biologists following protocols developed by Parks and the WA DNR Natural Heritage Program (NHP), serve as the foundation for the SNR. Additional habitat data, from sister conservation agencies, are layered atop select attributes collected during the vegetation surveys. The result is a geodatabase of important habitats to conserve across the park system. The full suite of data used in the SNR is noted below. What data comprises the SNR? As noted above, the SNR is comprised of data from the agency’s vegetation surveys and habitat-related data compiled by other government agencies. They are considered to be the most relevant and best datasets to use in the model, which span a range of habitat characteristics and conditions. Specifically, the following geodatabases (metrics) comprise the SNR:1. State Parks Vegetation Community and Rare Plant Surveysa. Plant Associations (PA) and their Global (G) and State (S) conservation ranksb. Overall Ecological Condition of the PAc. Ecological Systems and their functional sizesd. Old Growth habitats2. NHP Rare Plants and their G and S ranks3. WDFW Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) rare species habitats and their conservation status4. Washington Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Working Group landscape integrity model5. National Wetlands Inventory to map habitats close to water.63 years ago
- Click to downloadClick for metadataService URL: https://gis.dnr.wa.gov/site2/rest/services/Public_Forest_Practices/WADNR_PUBLIC_FP_Unstable_Slopes/MapServer/3The siteclass data layer was created for use in implementing Forest Practices' Riparian Management Rules. (See WAC 222-30-021 and 222-30-022.) The siteclass data layer was derived from the DNR soils data layer's site index codes and major tree species codes for western and eastern Washington soils contained in the layer's Soils-Main table and Soils-Pflg (private forest land grade) table. Site index ranges in the Soils_PFLG took precedence over site index ranges in the Soils-Main table where data existed.The siteclass data layer was created for use in implementing new ForestPractices' Riparian Management Rules. (See WAC 222-30-021 and 222-30-022.) The siteclass information was derived from the DNR soils data layer's site indexcodes and major tree species codes for western and eastern Washington soilscontained in the layer's Soils-Main table and Soils-Pflg (private forest landgrade) table. Site index ranges in the Soils_PFLG took precedence over siteindex ranges in the Soils-Main table where data existed.Siteclass codes as derived from the soil survey:For Western Washington, the 50 year site index is used SITECLASS SITE INDEX RANGE I 137+ II 119-136 III 97-118 IV 76-96 V 1-75For Eastern Washington, the 100 year site index is used SITECLASS SITE INDEX RANGE I 120+ II 101-120 III 81-100 IV 61-80 V 1-60In addition to the coding scheme above, the following codes were added forrule compliance: SITECLASS DESCRIPTION 6 (Red Alder) The soils major species code indicated Red Alder 7 (ND/GP) No data), NA, or gravel pit 8 (NC/MFP) Non-commercial or marginal commercial forest land 9 (WAT) Water body(Rule note: If the site index does not exist or indicates red alder,noncommercial, or marginally commercial species, the following apply:If the whole RMZ width is within those categories, use site class V.If those categories occupy only a portion of the RMZ width, then use thesite index for conifer in the adjacent soil polygon.)WADNR SOILS LAYER INFORMATION LAYER: SOILS GEN.SOURCE: State soils mapping program CODE DOCUMENT: State soil surveys CONTACT: NA COVER TYPE: Spatial polygon coverage DATA TYPE: Primary data Information for the SOILS data layer was derived from the Private Forest Land Grading system (PFLG) and subsequent soil surveys. PFLG was a five year mapping program completed in 1980 for the purpose of forest land taxation. It was funded by the Washington State Department of Revenue in cooperation with the Department of Natural Resources, Soil Conservation Service (SCS), USDA Forest Service and Washington State University. State and private lands which had the potential of supporting commercial forest stands were surveyed. Some Indian tribal and federal lands were surveyed. Because this was a cooperative soil survey project, agricultural and non- commercial forest lands were also included within some survey areas. After the Department of Natural Resources originally developed its geographic information system, digitized soils delineations and a few soil attributes were transferred to the system. Remaining PFLG soil attributes were added at a later time and are now available through associated lookup tables. SCS soils data on agricultural lands also have subsequently been added to this data layer. Approximately 1100 townships wholly or partially contain digitized soils data (2101 townships would provide complete coverage of the state of Washington). SOILS data are currently stored in the Polygon Attribute Table (.PAT) and INFO expansion files. COORDINATE SYSTEM: WA State Plane South Zone (5626) (N. zone converted to S. zone) COORDINATE UNITS: Feet HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD27 PROJECTION NAME: Lambert Conformal Conic **** MAJOR CODES USED FOR SITECLASS DATA*****PFLG DATA: ITEM: PFLG.MAJ.SPEC TITLE: Potential major tree species for given soil FORMAT: INPUT OUTPUT DATA DECIMAL ARRAY ARRAY WIDTH WIDTH TYPE PLACES OCCUR. INDEX ------------------------------------------------- 3 3 C 0 0 0 CODE TABLE OR VALUE RANGE: SOIL.MAJ.SPEC.CODE DESCRIPTION: Potentially major tree species for a given soil type. The data carried by this item describes a major commercial tree species that could potentially grow on a specific soil type as identified in the Private Forest Land Grading program (PFLG). Non-tree codes are also included to map non-soil ground cover, e.g. water, gravel pits. ITEM: PFLG.SITE.INDEX TITLE: Mean site index calc.from trees on given soil FORMAT: INPUT OUTPUT DATA DECIMAL ARRAY ARRAY WIDTH WIDTH TYPE PLACES OCCUR. INDEX ------------------------------------------------- 3 3 I 0 0 0 CODE TABLE OR VALUE RANGE: 0-200 DESCRIPTION: Site index data collected for the Private Forest Land Grading soils program (PFLG). It is a designation of the quality of a forest site based on the height of of the tallest trees (dominant and co-dominant trees) in a stand at an arbitrarily chosen age. Usually the age chosen is 50 or 100 years. For example, if the average height attained by the tallest trees in a fully stocked stand at the age of 50 years is 75 feet, the site index is 75 feet. Westside site conditions are estimated by using an index age of 50 years, while eastside site conditions are estimated by using an index age of 100 years.--------------------------------------------------------------------SOILS-MAIN DATA: CODE TABLE NAME: SOIL.MAJ.SPEC.CODE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- CODE MAP/REPORT MAP CODE DESCRIPTION LABEL SYMB --------- ------------ ---- -------------------------------------------------- AF ALPINE FIR 0 Subalpine fir DF DOUGLAS FIR 0 Douglas fir GF GRAND FIR 0 Grand fir GP GRAVEL PIT 0 Gravel pit LP LODGEPOLE PN 0 Lodgepole pine MFP MAR FOR PROD 0 Marginal forest productivity NA N/A 0 Not applicable NC NON-COMMERC 0 Non-commercial ND NO DATA 0 No data PP PONDEROSA PN 0 Ponderosa pine RA RED ALDER 0 Red alder WAT WATER 0 Water WH W HEMLOCK 0 Western hemlock WL W LARCH 0 Western larch WP W WHITE PINE 0 Western white pine ITEM: SITE.INDEX.SIDE TITLE: Indicates 100 yr or 50 yr soil site index FORMAT: INPUT OUTPUT DATA DECIMAL ARRAY ARRAY WIDTH WIDTH TYPE PLACES OCCUR. INDEX ------------------------------------------------- 1 1 C 0 0 0 CODE FILE OR VALUE RANGE: SITE.INDEX.SIDE.CODE DESCRIPTION: Code used to indicate whether 100 year or 50 year site index tables are used to calculate the site index of a soil type. Note that some site indexes for "eastside" soils are based on the 50 year index table. SITE.INDEX.SIDE Indicates 100 yr or 50 yr soil site index CODE FILE SITE.INDEX.SIDE.CODE IS NOT USED BY OTHER ITEMS CODE MAP/REPORT MAP CODE DESCRIPTION LABEL SYMB --------- ------------ ---- -------------------------------------------------- E 100 YR SITE 0 Soil site index based on 100 year table W 50 YR SITE 0 Soil site index based on 50 year table------------------------------------------------------------------83 years ago
- Click to downloadClick for metadataService URL: https://gis.dnr.wa.gov/site2/rest/services/Public_Forest_Practices/WADNR_PUBLIC_FP_Water_Type/MapServer/4For large areas, like Washington State, download as a file geodatabase. Large data sets like this one, for the State of Washington, may exceed the limits for downloading as shape files, excel files, or KML files. For areas less than a county, you may use the map to zoom to your area and download as shape file, excel or KML, if that format is desired.The DNR Forest Practices Wetlands Geographic Information System (GIS) Layer is based on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). In cooperation with the Washington State Department of Ecology, DNR Forest Practices developed a systematic reclassification of the original USFWS wetlands codes into WAC 222-16-035 types. The reclassification was done in 1995 according to the Forest Practice Rules in place at the time. The WAC's for defining wetlands are 222-16-035 and 222-16-050.The DNR Forest Practices Wetlands Geographic Information System (GIS) Layer is based on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). In cooperation with the Washington State Department of Ecology, DNR Forest Practices developed a systematic reclassification of the original USFWS wetlands codes into WAC 222-16-035 types. The reclassification was done in 1995 according to the Forest Practice Rules in place at the time. The WAC's for defining wetlands are 222-16-035 and 222-16-050.It is intended that these data be only a first step in determining whether or not wetland issues have been or need to be addressed in an area. The DNR Forest Practices Division and the Department of Ecology strongly supports the additional use of hydric soils (from the GIS soils layer) to add weight to the call of 'wetland'. Reports from the Department of Ecology indicate that these data may substantially underestimate the extent of forested wetlands. Various studies show the NWI data is 25-80% accurate in forested areas. Most of these data were collected from stereopaired aerial photos at a scale of 1:58,000. The stated accuracy is that of a 1:24,000 map, or plus or minus 40 feet. In addition, some parts of the state have data that are 30 years old and only a small percentage have been field checked. Thus, for regulatory purposes, the user should not rely solely on these data. On-the-ground checking must accompany any regulatory call based on these data.The reclassification is based on the USFWS FWS_CODE. The FWS_CODE is a concatenation of three subcomponents: Wetland system, class, and water regime. Forest Practices further divided the components into system, subsystem, class, subclass, water regime, special modifiers, xclass, subxclass, and xsystem. The last three items (xsomething) are for wetland areas which do not easily lend themselves to one class alone. The resulting classification system uses two fields: WLND_CLASS and WLND_TYPE. WLND_CLASS indicates whether the polygon is a forested wetland (F), open water (O), or a vegetated wetland (W). WLND_TYPE, indicates whether the wetland is a type A (1), type B (2), or a generic wetland (3) that doesn't fit the categories for A or B type wetlands. WLND_TYPE = 0 (zero) is used where WLND_CLASS = O (letter "O"). The wetland polygon is classified as F, forested wetland; O, open water; or W, vegetated wetland depending on the following FWS_CODE categories: F O W --------------------------------------------------- Forested Open Vegetated Wetland Water Wetland --------------------------------------------PFO* POW PUB5 E2FO PRB* PML2 PUB1-4 PEM* PAB* L2US5 PUS1-4 L2EM2 PFL* PSS* L1RB* PML1 L1UB* L1AB* L1OW L2RB* L2UB* L2AB* L2RS* L2US1-4 L2OW ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * indicates inclusion of the subcategory (ie. PEM* includes PEM1F, PEM1FB, etc.). DNR FOREST PRACTICES WETLANDS DATASET ON FPARS Internet Mapping Website: The FPARS Resource Map and Water Type Map display Forested, Type A, Type B, and "other" wetlands. Open water polygons are not displayed on the FPARS Resource Map and Water Type Map in an attempt to minimize clutter. The following code combinations are found in the DNR Forest Practices wetlands dataset: WLND_CLASS WLND_TYPE wetland polygon classification F 3 Forested wetland as defined in WAC 222-16-035 O 0 *NWI open water (not displayed on FPARS Resource or Water Type Maps) W 1 Type A Wetland as defined in WAC 222-16-035 W 2 Type B Wetland as defined in WAC 222-16-035 W 3 other wetland * NWI open water polygons are indicated by WLND_CLASS = O and WLND_TYPE = 0. Open water is used in the USFWS and WAC 222-16-035 classification system. These open water polygons are not included in the FPARS Resource Map and Water Type Map views of this dataset in an attempt to minimize clutter on the FPARS maps.83 years ago
- This imagery service is for viewing only, no downloading of the raster images available.23 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- WBDHU6: This geospatial dataset represents the 3rd level (6-digit) hydrologic unit boundaries of the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) layer for Washington. It was created by dissolving boundaries from the finer resolution hydrologic units to create these broader boundaries. See metadata for the wbd_wa_poly feature class for a more complete description of the WBD. USGS Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) located here: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/pdf/tm11-a3.pdf23 years ago
- 3 years ago
- Washington State Department of Agriculture regulates dairy farm compliance with state water quality and food safety law. This includes regular inspections of dairy production fields and facilities. The milking facilities, which generally represent the heart of the operation, are mapped for internal and public use. This dataset includes all active cow dairy milking facilities. The data are updated quarterly. The dataset includes information about the spatial distribution of dairies in Washington State and information about each business itself. Pursuant to WAC 16-06-210, some information is expressed in ranges to meet non-disclosure requirements. The following is a description of the attributes included with the WA Dairies dataset: AG ID: The agency given identification number assigned at the initial licensing of the dairy. Facility Size: This is a general summary of the farm size. For DNMP purposes, size is determined by mature (milking + dry) animal numbers; with a dairy herd of up to 199 animals being a Small, 200-699 being medium, and 700 or greater being Large. Business Name: The name which appears on the milking license. Site Address: The street address of the farm milking facility (not the business mailing address). Site City: The city wherein lies the milking facility County: The county wherein lies the milking facility. DNMP Region: The Dairy Nutrient Management Program Region wherein lies the milking facility. CAFO Status: This field denotes whether or not the dairy milking license has an associated Confined Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) permit. CAFO ID: The permit identification number for the associated dairy. Range Current Acres: The current and approximate acreage of land application or farming production land associated with the dairy. Range Current Milking: The current and approximate number of milking animals currently in rotation. Range Current Dry: The current and approximate number of mature dry animals currently in rotation. Range Current Heifers: The current and approximate number of heifers (ages 6 months old to fresh) currently in rotation. Range Current Calves: The current and approximate number of calves (ages 0 to 6 months) currently in rotation. Latitude (WGS84): Latitude Datum World Geodetic System 1984 Longitude (WGS84): Longitude Datum World Geodetic System 1984 WRIA: The Water Resources Inventory Area (WRIA) wherein lies the milking facility. Conservation District: The Conservation District serving the dairy business.63 years ago
- DOWNLOAD RASTER IMAGERYThese layers show current Resource Inventory Units (RIUs) symbolized using attributes populated from remote-sensing predictionsRS-FRIS is a remote-sensing based forest inventory for WA DNR State Trust lands. RS-FRIS predicts forest conditions using statistical models that relate field measurements to three-dimensional remotely-sensed data (DAP and LiDAR point clouds). Forest metrics are predicted at a scale of 1/10th acre and stored as rasters. The attributes of each RIU are calculated as the mean of the raster cell values that fall within each polygon. Note: origin year and age are exceptions, and are based on the median value. RS-FRIS 4.0 was constructed using remote-sensing data collected in 2019 and 2020. Origin year and age are periodically updated to reflect harvest activities; all other attributes continue to report conditions as shown in the remote sensing data.Layers include: AGE, BA, BA_4, BA_4_CONIFER, BA_4_HWD, BA_6, BA_T100, BAP_HWD, BFVOL_GROSS, BFVOL_NET, BIOMASS_ALL, BIOMASS_LIVE, CANOPY_LAYERS, CARBON_ALL, CARBON_LIVE, CFVOL_DDWM, CFVOL_TOTAL, CLOSURE, COVER, HT_LOREY, HT_T40, HT_T100, HTMAX, QMD, QMD_6, QMD_T100, RD, RD_6, RD_SUM, SDI_SUM, SDI_SUM_4, SNAG_ACRE_15, SNAG_ACRE_20, SNAG_ACRE_21, SNAG_ACRE_30, TREE_ACRE, TREE_ACRE_4, TREE_ACRE_4_CONIFER, TREE_ACRE_6, TREE_ACRE_8, TREE_ACRE_11, TREE_ACRE_20, TREE_ACRE_21, TREE_ACRE_30 and TREE_ACRE_31.543 years ago
- Click to downloadClick for metadataService URL: https://gis.dnr.wa.gov/site3/rest/services/Public_Boundaries/WADNR_PUBLIC_Cadastre_OpenData/FeatureServer/10Official Washington State boundary93 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.This evolutionarily significant unit, or ESU, includes all naturally spawned populations of Chinook salmon from rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound, including the Strait of Juan De Fuca from the Elwha River, eastward, including rivers and streams flowing into Hood Canal, South Sound, North Sound and the Strait of Georgia in Washington, and 26 artificial propagation programs.23 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, two species of chum salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover chum by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.23 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.63 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, four species of coho salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover coho by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.23 years ago
- This dataset was updated in January 2013 to make use of newer watershed boundaries that better depict the freshwater range of Pacific salmon and steelhead under NOAA Fisheries' jurisdiction. They are provided for general reference only and do not constitute a legal description of any species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.Throughout the West Coast, two species of sockeye salmon are protected under the Endangered Species Act. The West Coast Region works with its partners to protect, conserve, and recover sockeye by addressing the threats these animals face and by restoring the habitat on which they depend.23 years ago
- This data delineates Washington DNR Forest Fire Shutdown Zones.During the fire season the map is used to display the Industrial Fire Precaution Levels (IFPL). The boundaries are provided to the public and other agencies in GIS formal to administer the shutdown zones.93 years ago
- Created to help protect the catchment areas for surface water sources. This layer is used in the Source Water Assessment Protection application. https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/eh/maps/SWAP/index.html23 years ago
- This dataset is used to track wildfire information, assess wildfire risks, and to plan wildfire prevention activities. It includes information about wildfires that have occurred on lands protected by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, 2008 to present.This dataset is used to track wildfire information, assess wildfire risks, and to plan wildfire prevention activities.93 years ago
- Explore big game, small game, upland game and migratory waterfowl hunting regulations for the state of Washington in a browser-based webmap application. This webmap allows a user to:Find permit and general season huntsSearch using criteria such as season, location, weapon type and moreReview specific hunt notes, Private Lands Hunting Opportunities and moreThis webmap was created by the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife and replaces the functionality of the GoHunt map application, which is no longer available.23 years ago
- Web Map illustration of certificated service areas described in the certification authority issued to Gas Company by Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC). Please note that the utility service territory boundaries identified in this map might not reflect up-to-date service territory boundaries. For up-to-date service territory information, please contact the natural gas utility directly.For additional information and question pertaining to natural gas certificate coverage and issuance please, contact the UTC Energy Section, (360) 664-1301.13 years ago
- Tacoma-Pierce County Nonattainment Area (a.k.a. Wapato Hills-Puyallup River Valley PM2.5 Nonattainment Area)63 years ago
- Washington marine (saltwater) shorelines including Puget Sound, Hood Canal, the Strait of Juan de Fuca, and the Pacific coastline. Also includes those portions of Washington's marine shorelines that are designated "Shorelines of State-wide Significance" by the Shoreline Management Act, Chapter 90.58. Nisqually Delta area updated May 2016 to reflect post dike removal.63 years ago
- The Washington State Department of Ecology has conducted monthly water quality monitoring at hundreds of freshwater and marine water quality stations throughout the state since 1959. Ecology monitors about 80 stations each year, some on a one-year basis, some on a five-year rotation, and some are monitored continuously. This spatial data set shows the location of these monitoring stations.63 years ago
- Streams where populations of New Zealand Mudsnails have been confirmed. Created as a featureclass and linear event table based on the current version of the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD).63 years ago
- Mobile map of Kitsap Memorial State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 17, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Manchester State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 17, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Rainbow Falls State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 20, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Rasar State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 20, 202113 years ago
- Mobile map of Scenic Beach State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 20, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Schafer State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 20, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Seaquest State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 21, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Spencer Spit State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 22, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Twanoh State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 22, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Twenty-Five Mile Creek State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 28, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Twin Harbors State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 28, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Wenatchee Confluence State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 29, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Yakima Sportsman State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published September 29, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of the Lake Spokane Campground portion of Riverside State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 5, 2021.13 years ago
- This feature layer presents the extent of floating kelp beds (Nereocystis luetkeana and Macrocystis pyrifera) along the Strait of Juan de Fuca and outer coast of Washington State summarized over the 1989-2021 monitoring period and three Aquatic Reserves over the 2010-2021 period.This summary layer, as well as the underlying annual surveys, are also available as a download. Data are derived from photo interpretation of low tide aerial photography in the late summer, the season of maximum extent. Polygons represent bed extent or planimeter, which include the kelp canopy floating on the surface and small gaps between plants (25 meter threshold for delineating discrete beds). The entire data set is comprised of the following components: yearly inventories (feature classes) from 1989 through 2021, excluding 1993 (kelpYYYY), a combined inventory from all years (kelp1989_2021), a spatial index delineating the geographic extent of monitoring sub-areas (map_index) and tabular data describing kelp characteristics for each year that link to the spatial index (summary_kelps_stats). It was necessary to generalize the polygons in kelp1989_2021 in order to produce a dataset that did not exceed the maximum number of vertices allowed for the feature class. Users who wish to use the most precise inventory estimates should use the tabular summary tables which summarize area by map_index. The tabular estimates are more precise because they are based on the source imagery, while the area estimates in the feature classes reflect subsequent processing.93 years ago
- There are more than 120 Sno-Parks (parking lots cleared of snow) available statewide during the winter. Approximately 80 of the Sno-Parks are designated primarily for snowmobiling. Please note that Sno-Parks and trail reports are updated regularly during the winter season. Sno-Park and trail information may change without notice due to snow conditions, temperatures, equipment breakdowns, etc. For updates, please check the website regularly.To download this and other data from Washington State Parks, go to geo.wa.gov and search for "wsprc" (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission).AttributesParkingType of SnoParkAreaCodeArea code SnoPark falls in.ElevationElevation of SnoPark (in feet).SnoParkIDSnoPark ID Number.ProperNameOfficial name of SnoParkCommentsGeneral notes/comments.LatitudeLatitudinal coordinates.LongitudeLongitudinal coordinates.DirectionsDirections on how to get to SnoPark.AltDirectionsAlternative directions on how to get to SnoPark.PDFA link to download a map of the SnoPark as a PDF.ImageLinkA photo of the SnoPark taken by a drone.ParkingSpacesNumber of parking spaces available at the park.PermitsPermits required to access the Park, if applicable.63 years ago
- Rivers and Lakes in Washington where known populations of New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) exist upstream or in the immediate watershed. Originally created from Washington Rivers polygon layer in 2010. Addtional polygons imported from NHDArea and NHDWaterbody beginning in 2014.63 years ago
- Mobile map of Moran State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Lincoln Rock State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November , 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Pearrygin Lake State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Millersylvania State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Cama Beach Historical State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Cape Disappointment State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Sacajawea State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Potlatch State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of the southwestern portion of Potholes State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Pacific Beach State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Olmstead Place Historical State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Paradise Point State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Sun Lakes-Dry Falls State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Steamboat Rock State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Dosewallips State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Lake Chelan State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Curlew Lake State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Watersheds where populations of the New Zealand mudsnail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) have been found or are likely to be found due to proximity to known populations. Based on HUC12 WBD Watersheds from USGS.63 years ago
- Mobile map of Daroga State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Lake Wenatchee State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Ocean City State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Peace Arch Historical State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Ginkgo Petrified Forest State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of the northern portion of Deception Pass State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Fort Flagler Historical State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Fort Simcoe Historical State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Fort Townsend Historical State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Fort Worden Historical State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Blake Island Marine State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Does Island Marine State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of James Island Marine State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Jones Island Marine State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Patos Island Marine State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- This GIS layer contains bathymetric elevation bands (derived from bathymetric contours) of selected freshwater lakes in Washington State. The majority of the bathymetric contours were digitized from maps contained in a series of seven documents: Reconnaissance Data on Lakes in Washington, Water-Supply Bulletin 43, Volume 1 through 7 by the United States Geological Survey in cooperation with the Washington State Department of Ecology. The exceptions are 1) Lake Chelan which was digitized in 2016 from the publication Morphometry of Lake Chelan (published in January 1987); 2) Lake Sammamish whose digital data was acquired from King County in 2013 and is derived from data collected during the publication of Development of a Three-Dimensional Hydrographic Model of Lake Sammamish (published in November 2008); and 3) Lake Crescent, whose digital bathymetric soundings were taken by a private party during 2013/2014 and provided to the Department of Ecology and were converted to contour lines in 2016.23 years ago
- Mobile map of Stuart Island Marine State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Sucia Island Marine State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Lake Lenore Caves State Park Heritage Site, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Steptoe Butte State Park Heritage Site, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Camp William T. Wooten State Park Property, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Wallace Falls State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published August 30, 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Crawford State Park Heritage Site, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Larrabee State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of the southern portion of Deception Pass State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of the northeastern portion of Potholes State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published November 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Possession Point State Park Property, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published December 2021.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Klickitat State Park Trail, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published January 2022.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Willapa Hills State Park Trail, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published January 2022.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Columbia Plateau State Park Trail, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published January 2022.13 years ago
- Mobile map of Spokane River Centennial State Park Trail, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published January 2022.13 years ago
- Littoral drift, or shore drift, is the process by which beach sediment is moved along the shoreline. Drift results primarily from the oblique approach of wind-generated waves and can therefore change in response to short-term (daily, weekly, or seasonally) shifts in wind direction. Over the long term, however, many shorelines exhibit a single direction of net shore drift. Net shore-drift is determined through geomorphologic analysis of beach sediment patterns and of coastal landforms. Many shorelines can be divided into discrete littoral, or drift, cells, which are independent of one another and for which distinct sediment sources and sinks can be identified. This coverage denotes the extent of individual littoral cells and the direction of net shore-drift within each.23 years ago
- Mobile map of Fort Ebey State Park, Washington. For use in the Field Maps app by ESRI. Published January 2022.13 years ago
- The National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) is a geospatial database that contains current effective flood hazard data. FEMA provides the flood hazard data to support the National Flood Insurance Program. You can use the information to better understand your level of flood risk and type of flooding.What does 1% Annual Chance mean? A flood that has a 1% chance of happening in any given year, also referred to as the Base Flood or 100-year flood.What is a Base Flood Elevation? The elevation of flood water during a 1% annual chance flood event is the Base Flood Elevation or BFE. The BFE is height of flood waters meeting the 1% annual chance and is expressed in feet at designated riverine cross sections and coastal transects.To download the current GIS version of the FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer, Please visit the FEMA Map Service Center and use the SEARCH ALL PRODUCTS option, then navigate to your State or County.To learn more, please feel free to contact Jerry Franklin at 360-407-7470 or Jerry.Franklin@ecy.wa.gov.23 years ago
- WSDOT Aviation Division has developed an easy to use web-based GIS mapping application that provides users with online access to critical information contained in Airport Layout Plans (ALP) and Airport Master Plans (AMPs). The goal of this application is to facilitate informed land use decision making by providing online access to critical airport information and interactive planning tools. With this application, users can:Select and view specific airport facility features, such as runways, aprons, taxiways, buildings, safety areas, airspace and property boundaries. Utilize a variety of beneficial tools and features; including: an address locator, lat/long locator, measuring tool, highway milepost locator, etc.Zoom to specific airports, cities or geographic regions.Select from 12 different base maps, including an aeronautical chart.FAR Part 77 airspace calculator (coming soon)If you have any questions about content of the application, please contact Carter Timmerman, Aviation Planner - timmerc@wsdot.wa.gov - (360) 709-8019. If you're having trouble viewing the application, please contact our Online Map Support. 23 years ago
- WDFW’s PHS_OregonWhiteOak layer consists of “Oak Woodlands in Southwest Washington” polygons (within all of Clark County and small portions of Skamania and Cowlitz counties) that shows modeled, presumed locations of Oregon White Oak Woodlands, as well as older polygons mapped by WDFW Habitat and Wildlife biologists. These oak polygons are defined by WDFW’s Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) program.23 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- This GIS layer contains bathymetric elevation bands (derived from bathymetric contours) of selected freshwater lakes in Washington State. The majority of the bathymetric contours were digitized from maps contained in a series of seven documents: Reconnissance Data on Lakes in Washington, Water-Supply Bulletin 43, Volume 1 through 7 by the United States Geological Survey in cooperation with the Washington State Department of Ecology. The exceptions are 1) Lake Chelan which was digitized in 2016 from the publiclication Morphometry of Lake Chelan (published in January 1987); 2) Lake Sammamish whose digital data was acquired from King County in 2013 and is derived from data collected during the publication of Development of a Three-Dimensional Hydrographic Model of Lake Sammamish (published in November 2008); and 3) Lake Crescent, whose digital bathymetric soundings were taken by a private party during 2013/2014 and provided to the Department of Ecology and were converted to contour lines in 2016.23 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- Web map for display of WA State Parks map data for staff and the public.13 years ago
- This interactive storymap is a supplement to the Washington State Freight System Plan, finalized and released by WSDOT in December 2022. This storymap provides the economic context of state freight system and illustrates how different supply chains of key freight industries work in Washington state, including agriculture, food manufacturing, forestry, and aerospace manufacturing.23 years ago
- Washington Department of Natural Resources Local Unit. These areas are administrative subunits of a Washington Department of Natural Resources District.WA DNR Units Metadata93 years ago
- This map service includes seagrass presence from underwater surveys in the marine nearshore of greater Puget Sound. The surveys are made with underwater video as part of a monitoring program conducted by the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Attributes describe the seagrass species classified at each point along the linear survey with a nominal spacing between points of approximately 1 meter. The map service currently serves 2000-2015 data. More recent data (2000-2017) is available for download.93 years ago
- This image service shows historical floating kelp locations along the Washington Coast and Puget Sound. It combines nine map sheets that were originally published in 1912. They summarize field surveys from 1911-1912. The Puget Sound surveys were conducted by Rigg. The maps were scanned and georeferenced, and the image service is hosted by the Washington Department of Natural Resources.23 years ago
- The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) Water Quality Program undertook the Nitrate Prioritization Project in 2014 (Morgan, 2014) because of growing concerns about groundwater contamination by nitrates, and the inability to display and evaluate nitrate data on a statewide basis. This report originated from the agriculture and water quality talks that took place in 2012. Participating agencies agreed that if data exists, everyone should be able to see it in one central location. Agencies that contributed included the Washington Dept. of Ecology, Washington Dept. of Health, Washington Dept. of Agriculture, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Natural Resource Conservation Service, U.S. Geological Survey, and the Washington Conservation Commission. The Safe Drinking Water Act nitrate limit for delivery of water from public water systems is 10 mg/L. This limit has been exceeded in public water supplies and private wells in various areas of the state going back decades. Not only is contaminated groundwater a public health issue, treatment is also very costly to the public water supply systems and individual households who must deal with contamination on their own. The goals of this project were to: Collect and organize statewide information about nitrate monitoring results, the physical factors that tend toward nitrate contamination, and United States Geological Survey (USGS) risk studies that evaluate the physical factors against monitoring results. Delineate areas where high nitrates in groundwater occur. Prioritize those areas by potential impacts to people and resources. Make the information available to everyone. The inputs for developing candidate Nitrate Priority Areas include: A single database of nitrate sampling results for groundwater compiled from state and federal databases. USGS nitrate risk studies. Surficial geology, soil properties, topography, well locations and depths, agricultural land use, irrigated areas, annual average precipitation, nitrate concentrations, and population. Monitoring data from the USGS and the Washington State Departments of Health and Ecology were collected and summarized. The well locations were mapped using a Geographic Information System (GIS). Clusters of wells where a sample has exceeded 10 mg/L are a strong indicator that groundwater at that location is at high risk of, or currently is contaminated by nitrate. Other indicators include USGS nitrate risk analyses, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil drainage classes and travel time through the soil profile (Ksat), surficial geology, recharge and well depths.Boundaries for candidate Nitrate Priority Areas were developed based on section lines that approximate natural boundaries. These areas will be subject to review and change where appropriate. Once the proposed Nitrate Priority Areas have been reviewed, section line-based boundaries may be replaced by natural boundaries where appropriate. Time series plots were produced for wells with four or more sample results with at least one result over 5 mg/L. This resulted in a distribution of over 1200 graphs across the state. These are accessible through the GIS as a popup from the well location point for those who have a GIS system with this capability, and who request and receive the necessary files. A web-based application would make these graphs widely and easily available. Challenges with databases always include checking for errors, such as the occasional locational or data entry error. Care must be used to understand the limitations of the data and the peculiarities of each data source. These issues are described more in this report. Recommendations include developing a web application to make this information easily accessible by anyone with internet access, and automating the data downloads so they are easily updated. Management of nitrate sources to prevent groundwater contamination should be adjusted for sensitive conditions like excessively draining soils and very hydrologically conductive geologic materials. Nitrate source loading needs to be reduced in impacted areas to prevent groundwater contamination. Results of this study can be used to protect public drinking water supplies by focusing actions on areas within the state that have the highest potential for impacts due to nitrate contamination of groundwater.63 years ago
- This feature class is a representation of the Game Management Unit Areas of Washington state. This polygon information represents a generalized interpretation of the legal descriptions in the Washington Administrative Code; Sections (Section 220-401-010 to 220-401-060). and the 'Washington's Big Game Hunting Seasons and Regulations' pamphlet. The river coast lines have been extended to County lines to create a more cartographically useful product.63 years ago
- Emergency Response Boundaries have been extracted from the WA (Enhanced) E911 system. They represent the response boundaries of emergency service providers across Washington State. Includes individual layers for Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Fire Services (Fire), and Law Enforcement Services (Law).63 years ago
- Emergency Response Boundaries have been extracted from the WA (Enhanced) E911 system. They represent the response boundaries of emergency service providers across Washington State. Includes individual layers for Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Fire Services (Fire), and Law Enforcement Services (Law).23 years ago
- Linear referencing is a method for locating data at a measured distance along a linear feature.A linear referencing system is also referred to as an LRS. You might have heard an LRS reference like this: a collision occurred near milepost 135 on Interstate 5, Southbound.Or like this: there is a road closure due to a landslide on State Route 410 near milepost 48.23 years ago
- Web Map illustration of Garbage Service Area Boundary described in the certificated authority issued to Solid Waste Companies by Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC). For additional information and questions pertaining to solid waste certificate coverage and issuance please, contact the UTC Licensing Section, 360-664-1223,13 years ago
- The State Art Collection is a public collection of artwork: it is publicly owned, publicly sited, and publicly selected. It currently includes over 4,500 works, making Washington home to not only one of the oldest state public art collections, but also one of the largest. The State Art Collection is shaped in an inclusive manner to represent the diversity of contemporary artistic production. Artworks in the State Art Collection are acquired for sites such as K-12 schools, colleges, universities, and state agencies. Artworks at colleges and universities are included in this data set. Notable local, regional, and national artists are represented in the collection holdings.23 years ago
- WA Public Safety Answering Points (PSAP) Boundaries. This data was updated with Nov 2018 version. Attributes have changed. Please update your links as needed. contact Joanne Markert, State GIS Coordinator, 360.407.8691 with any questions or concerns.63 years ago
- 3 years ago
- The digital maps presented here were originally published as hard copy maps in the Coastal Zone Atlas of Washington between 1978 and 1980. Although the Atlas has been out of print for many years, the maps contain information that remain the basis for local planning decisions. After receiving multiple requests for electronic versions of portions of the Atlas, an effort was made to scan, georeference and digitize aspects of the Atlas, beginning with the slope stability maps. These maps indicate the relative stability of coastal slopes as interpreted by geologists based on aerial photographs, geological mapping, topography, and field observations. Such methods are standard, but may occasionally result in some unstable areas being overlooked and in some stable areas being incorrectly identified as unstable. Further inaccuracies are introduced to the data through the process of converting the published maps into digital format. Important land use or building decisions should always be based on detailed geotechnical investigations. This mapping represents conditions observed in the early and mid-1970s. Shorelines and steep slopes are dynamic areas and many landslides have occurred since that time that are not reflected on these maps. Subsequent human activities may have increased or decreased the stability of some areas.23 years ago
- This dataset contains spatial and attribute information of the Surface Water Quality Standards for the State of Washington, Chapter 173-201A WAC. Four views of the WQ Standard are contained in this dataset, Freshwater Beneficial Uses, Seasonal Supplemental Spawning and Egg Incubation Temperature Standards, rules designated in Table 602, and exceptions to Table 602 listed in the footnotes. If any discrepancies are found between GIS layers and the published rule, the published rule takes precedence. Updated April 2018.23 years ago
- Drought Areas data description: This data layer is derived from copying the designated WRIAs. WRIAs data description: Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA) for Washington State at 1:24,000 scale. WRIAs were formalized under WAC 173-500-040 and authorized under the Water Resources Act of 1971, RCW 90.54. Ecology was given the responsibility for the development and management of these administrative and planning boundaries. These boundaries represent the administrative under pinning of this agency's business activities. The original WRIA boundary agreements and judgments were reached jointly by Washington's natural resource agencies (Ecology, Natural Resources, Fish and Wildlife) in 1970.23 years ago
- These polygon features represent Water Quality Improvement (WQI) projects managed by the Washington State Department of Ecology. WQI projects can be TMDLs, Straight To Implementation (STI) plans, 4b projects and TMDL Alternatives. The boundaries show where the WQI project applies and is being implemented. TMDL Boundaries identified as "In Development" are considered draft and are subject to change when the project has been approved by the U.S. EPA. U.S. EPA only approves TMDLs and 4b projects. Boundaries are representations of each particular project and does not replace the official version of the approved TMDL report. Please see the TMDL Project webpage for specific information about that project. TMDL projects are required by the Federal Clean Water Act to identify pollution sources and pollution load reductions needed for water bodies to meet water quality standards. Once a TMDL project has been approved by the U.S. EPA, it enters an implementation phase where both point source and non-point source pollution is reduced through permit limits regulated under the NPDES system and through best management practices for land uses that contribute to non-point source pollution. Ecology’s water quality program works with permittees, local governments, watershed stakeholders, and residents to reduce sources of pollution to protect our aquatic resources and public health.23 years ago
- Air quality in most areas of Washington State is protected by local clean air agencies. Tribes protect and have authority over their tribal lands. Areas are based on county boundaries except for tribes where the boundary is the reservation. Ecology's regional offices have authority in all other areas63 years ago
- A dynamic map service composed of the points representing the Ecology streamflow gages joined to a table containing the previous day's streamflow summary data which is updated via a nightly process from the Hydstra database. All flow data presented for the gaging stations are based on the previous day’s flow. This service was specifically designed to support the Washington Current Streamflow Summary web mapping application.For more information, please email gis@ecy.wa.gov.23 years ago
- A dynamic map service composed of the points representing the Ecology streamflow gages joined to a table containing the previous day's streamflow summary data which is updated via a nightly process from the Hydstra database. All flow data presented for the gaging stations are based on the previous day’s flow. This service was specifically designed to support the Washington Current Streamflow Summary web mapping application.For more information, please email gis@ecy.wa.gov.43 years ago
- A dynamic map service composed of the points representing the Ecology streamflow gages joined to a table containing the previous day's streamflow summary data which is updated via a nightly process from the Hydstra database. All flow data presented for the gaging stations are based on the previous day’s flow. This service was specifically designed to support the Washington Current Streamflow Summary web mapping application.For more information, please email gis@ecy.wa.gov.63 years ago
- Welcome to the Department of Ecology Well Logs. A Well Log means a Well Report and describes the location, ownership, construction details and lithology of a completed well. This web site enables you to search for wells which have well reports and to view the well report using a variety of search tools. 23 years ago
- This dataset describes Tribal Lands in Washington State. Included are areas where the tribes ceded title to their historic areas of use to the U.S. Government through various treaties enacted during the later half of the 19th century. Boundary lines have been digitized from a variety of digital data sources including 1:100,000 streams for boundaries described in treaties as following a stream or river, 1:24k Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA), Watershed Administrative Unit (WAU) and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) boundaries for boundaries referred to in treaties as 'divide', 'summit' or 'between the waters of', 1:100,000 Major Public Lands (for current reservation areas), 10 meter DEM and 7.5 minute USGS digital Quad maps (to define ridgelines and 'divide' where WRIA, WAU or HUC boundaries don't exist) and NAIP orthophoto imagery (to get a feel for what a questionable boundary area actually looks like today). Ceded Land treaty areas are based on treaty language and US Government decrees dated 1854-1892. Natural geographic barriers such as streams and ridge lines were used where described or eluded to in treaty descriptions. Coordinate based latitude/longitude boundary lines were used in some Central Washington areas where described. References to general compass directions were followed using natural barriers such as watershed boundaries or drainages wherever possible. Some treaty boundary descriptions were found to be inadequate, inaccurate and in some cases misleading in nature in describing what should have been a natural boundary or even a coordinate based solution to a property description. Some of these boundary areas open to interpretation are discussed below in the Supplemental Information based on the language and definite boundaries of other treaty areas. Ceded areas in Oregon and Idaho from the Camp Stevens Treaties have been included in this dataset. The Washington State Department of Ecology makes no warranty for the accuracy of this material and is not libel for its use. Ecology will maintain this data layer for its own use and distribute to all interested parties. Updates, corrections and documentation should be submitted to the contact person. This data may or may not reflect the most current tribal reservation areas. Tribal reservations are updated regularly in the Major Public Lands (MPL) layer maintained by Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This GIS data is draft information and a work in progress and should be used only as a generalized visual guide to 150 year old treaties of limited content.93 years ago
- This dataset describes Tribal Lands in Washington State. Included are areas where the tribes ceded title to their historic areas of use to the U.S. Government through various treaties enacted during the later half of the 19th century. Boundary lines have been digitized from a variety of digital data sources including 1:100,000 streams for boundaries described in treaties as following a stream or river, 1:24k Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA), Watershed Administrative Unit (WAU) and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) boundaries for boundaries referred to in treaties as 'divide', 'summit' or 'between the waters of', 1:100,000 Major Public Lands (for current reservation areas), 10 meter DEM and 7.5 minute USGS digital Quad maps (to define ridgelines and 'divide' where WRIA, WAU or HUC boundaries don't exist) and NAIP orthophoto imagery (to get a feel for what a questionable boundary area actually looks like today). Ceded Land treaty areas are based on treaty language and US Government decrees dated 1854-1892. Natural geographic barriers such as streams and ridge lines were used where described or eluded to in treaty descriptions. Coordinate based latitude/longitude boundary lines were used in some Central Washington areas where described. References to general compass directions were followed using natural barriers such as watershed boundaries or drainages wherever possible. Some treaty boundary descriptions were found to be inadequate, inaccurate and in some cases misleading in nature in describing what should have been a natural boundary or even a coordinate based solution to a property description. Some of these boundary areas open to interpretation are discussed below in the Supplemental Information based on the language and definite boundaries of other treaty areas. Ceded areas in Oregon and Idaho from the Camp Stevens Treaties have been included in this dataset. The Washington State Department of Ecology makes no warranty for the accuracy of this material and is not libel for its use. Ecology will maintain this data layer for its own use and distribute to all interested parties. Updates, corrections and documentation should be submitted to the contact person. This data may or may not reflect the most current tribal reservation areas. Tribal reservations are updated regularly in the Major Public Lands (MPL) layer maintained by Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This GIS data is draft information and a work in progress and should be used only as a generalized visual guide to 150 year old treaties of limited content.93 years ago
- This dataset describes Tribal Lands in Washington State. Included are areas where the tribes ceded title to their historic areas of use to the U.S. Government through various treaties enacted during the later half of the 19th century. Boundary lines have been digitized from a variety of digital data sources including 1:100,000 streams for boundaries described in treaties as following a stream or river, 1:24k Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA), Watershed Administrative Unit (WAU) and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) boundaries for boundaries referred to in treaties as 'divide', 'summit' or 'between the waters of', 1:100,000 Major Public Lands (for current reservation areas), 10 meter DEM and 7.5 minute USGS digital Quad maps (to define ridgelines and 'divide' where WRIA, WAU or HUC boundaries don't exist) and NAIP orthophoto imagery (to get a feel for what a questionable boundary area actually looks like today). Ceded Land treaty areas are based on treaty language and US Government decrees dated 1854-1892. Natural geographic barriers such as streams and ridge lines were used where described or eluded to in treaty descriptions. Coordinate based latitude/longitude boundary lines were used in some Central Washington areas where described. References to general compass directions were followed using natural barriers such as watershed boundaries or drainages wherever possible. Some treaty boundary descriptions were found to be inadequate, inaccurate and in some cases misleading in nature in describing what should have been a natural boundary or even a coordinate based solution to a property description. Some of these boundary areas open to interpretation are discussed below in the Supplemental Information based on the language and definite boundaries of other treaty areas. Ceded areas in Oregon and Idaho from the Camp Stevens Treaties have been included in this dataset. The Washington State Department of Ecology makes no warranty for the accuracy of this material and is not libel for its use. Ecology will maintain this data layer for its own use and distribute to all interested parties. Updates, corrections and documentation should be submitted to the contact person. This data may or may not reflect the most current tribal reservation areas. Tribal reservations are updated regularly in the Major Public Lands (MPL) layer maintained by Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This GIS data is draft information and a work in progress and should be used only as a generalized visual guide to 150 year old treaties of limited content.93 years ago
- This dataset describes Tribal Lands in Washington State. Included are areas where the tribes ceded title to their historic areas of use to the U.S. Government through various treaties enacted during the later half of the 19th century. Boundary lines have been digitized from a variety of digital data sources including 1:100,000 streams for boundaries described in treaties as following a stream or river, 1:24k Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA), Watershed Administrative Unit (WAU) and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) boundaries for boundaries referred to in treaties as 'divide', 'summit' or 'between the waters of', 1:100,000 Major Public Lands (for current reservation areas), 10 meter DEM and 7.5 minute USGS digital Quad maps (to define ridgelines and 'divide' where WRIA, WAU or HUC boundaries don't exist) and NAIP orthophoto imagery (to get a feel for what a questionable boundary area actually looks like today). Ceded Land treaty areas are based on treaty language and US Government decrees dated 1854-1892. Natural geographic barriers such as streams and ridge lines were used where described or eluded to in treaty descriptions. Coordinate based latitude/longitude boundary lines were used in some Central Washington areas where described. References to general compass directions were followed using natural barriers such as watershed boundaries or drainages wherever possible. Some treaty boundary descriptions were found to be inadequate, inaccurate and in some cases misleading in nature in describing what should have been a natural boundary or even a coordinate based solution to a property description. Some of these boundary areas open to interpretation are discussed below in the Supplemental Information based on the language and definite boundaries of other treaty areas. Ceded areas in Oregon and Idaho from the Camp Stevens Treaties have been included in this dataset. The Washington State Department of Ecology makes no warranty for the accuracy of this material and is not libel for its use. Ecology will maintain this data layer for its own use and distribute to all interested parties. Updates, corrections and documentation should be submitted to the contact person. This data may or may not reflect the most current tribal reservation areas. Tribal reservations are updated regularly in the Major Public Lands (MPL) layer maintained by Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This GIS data is draft information and a work in progress and should be used only as a generalized visual guide to 150 year old treaties of limited content.93 years ago
- This dataset describes Tribal Lands in Washington State. Included are areas where the tribes ceded title to their historic areas of use to the U.S. Government through various treaties enacted during the later half of the 19th century. Boundary lines have been digitized from a variety of digital data sources including 1:100,000 streams for boundaries described in treaties as following a stream or river, 1:24k Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA), Watershed Administrative Unit (WAU) and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) boundaries for boundaries referred to in treaties as 'divide', 'summit' or 'between the waters of', 1:100,000 Major Public Lands (for current reservation areas), 10 meter DEM and 7.5 minute USGS digital Quad maps (to define ridgelines and 'divide' where WRIA, WAU or HUC boundaries don't exist) and NAIP orthophoto imagery (to get a feel for what a questionable boundary area actually looks like today). Ceded Land treaty areas are based on treaty language and US Government decrees dated 1854-1892. Natural geographic barriers such as streams and ridge lines were used where described or eluded to in treaty descriptions. Coordinate based latitude/longitude boundary lines were used in some Central Washington areas where described. References to general compass directions were followed using natural barriers such as watershed boundaries or drainages wherever possible. Some treaty boundary descriptions were found to be inadequate, inaccurate and in some cases misleading in nature in describing what should have been a natural boundary or even a coordinate based solution to a property description. Some of these boundary areas open to interpretation are discussed below in the Supplemental Information based on the language and definite boundaries of other treaty areas. Ceded areas in Oregon and Idaho from the Camp Stevens Treaties have been included in this dataset. The Washington State Department of Ecology makes no warranty for the accuracy of this material and is not libel for its use. Ecology will maintain this data layer for its own use and distribute to all interested parties. Updates, corrections and documentation should be submitted to the contact person. This data may or may not reflect the most current tribal reservation areas. Tribal reservations are updated regularly in the Major Public Lands (MPL) layer maintained by Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This GIS data is draft information and a work in progress and should be used only as a generalized visual guide to 150 year old treaties of limited content.93 years ago
- This dataset describes Tribal Lands in Washington State. Included are areas where the tribes ceded title to their historic areas of use to the U.S. Government through various treaties enacted during the later half of the 19th century. Boundary lines have been digitized from a variety of digital data sources including 1:100,000 streams for boundaries described in treaties as following a stream or river, 1:24k Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA), Watershed Administrative Unit (WAU) and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) boundaries for boundaries referred to in treaties as 'divide', 'summit' or 'between the waters of', 1:100,000 Major Public Lands (for current reservation areas), 10 meter DEM and 7.5 minute USGS digital Quad maps (to define ridgelines and 'divide' where WRIA, WAU or HUC boundaries don't exist) and NAIP orthophoto imagery (to get a feel for what a questionable boundary area actually looks like today). Ceded Land treaty areas are based on treaty language and US Government decrees dated 1854-1892. Natural geographic barriers such as streams and ridge lines were used where described or eluded to in treaty descriptions. Coordinate based latitude/longitude boundary lines were used in some Central Washington areas where described. References to general compass directions were followed using natural barriers such as watershed boundaries or drainages wherever possible. Some treaty boundary descriptions were found to be inadequate, inaccurate and in some cases misleading in nature in describing what should have been a natural boundary or even a coordinate based solution to a property description. Some of these boundary areas open to interpretation are discussed below in the Supplemental Information based on the language and definite boundaries of other treaty areas. Ceded areas in Oregon and Idaho from the Camp Stevens Treaties have been included in this dataset. The Washington State Department of Ecology makes no warranty for the accuracy of this material and is not libel for its use. Ecology will maintain this data layer for its own use and distribute to all interested parties. Updates, corrections and documentation should be submitted to the contact person. This data may or may not reflect the most current tribal reservation areas. Tribal reservations are updated regularly in the Major Public Lands (MPL) layer maintained by Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This GIS data is draft information and a work in progress and should be used only as a generalized visual guide to 150 year old treaties of limited content.93 years ago
- This dataset describes Tribal Lands in Washington State. Included are areas where the tribes ceded title to their historic areas of use to the U.S. Government through various treaties enacted during the later half of the 19th century. Boundary lines have been digitized from a variety of digital data sources including 1:100,000 streams for boundaries described in treaties as following a stream or river, 1:24k Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA), Watershed Administrative Unit (WAU) and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) boundaries for boundaries referred to in treaties as 'divide', 'summit' or 'between the waters of', 1:100,000 Major Public Lands (for current reservation areas), 10 meter DEM and 7.5 minute USGS digital Quad maps (to define ridgelines and 'divide' where WRIA, WAU or HUC boundaries don't exist) and NAIP orthophoto imagery (to get a feel for what a questionable boundary area actually looks like today). Ceded Land treaty areas are based on treaty language and US Government decrees dated 1854-1892. Natural geographic barriers such as streams and ridge lines were used where described or eluded to in treaty descriptions. Coordinate based latitude/longitude boundary lines were used in some Central Washington areas where described. References to general compass directions were followed using natural barriers such as watershed boundaries or drainages wherever possible. Some treaty boundary descriptions were found to be inadequate, inaccurate and in some cases misleading in nature in describing what should have been a natural boundary or even a coordinate based solution to a property description. Some of these boundary areas open to interpretation are discussed below in the Supplemental Information based on the language and definite boundaries of other treaty areas. Ceded areas in Oregon and Idaho from the Camp Stevens Treaties have been included in this dataset. The Washington State Department of Ecology makes no warranty for the accuracy of this material and is not libel for its use. Ecology will maintain this data layer for its own use and distribute to all interested parties. Updates, corrections and documentation should be submitted to the contact person. This data may or may not reflect the most current tribal reservation areas. Tribal reservations are updated regularly in the Major Public Lands (MPL) layer maintained by Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This GIS data is draft information and a work in progress and should be used only as a generalized visual guide to 150 year old treaties of limited content.93 years ago
- This dataset describes Tribal Lands in Washington State. Included are areas where the tribes ceded title to their historic areas of use to the U.S. Government through various treaties enacted during the later half of the 19th century. Boundary lines have been digitized from a variety of digital data sources including 1:100,000 streams for boundaries described in treaties as following a stream or river, 1:24k Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA), Watershed Administrative Unit (WAU) and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) boundaries for boundaries referred to in treaties as 'divide', 'summit' or 'between the waters of', 1:100,000 Major Public Lands (for current reservation areas), 10 meter DEM and 7.5 minute USGS digital Quad maps (to define ridgelines and 'divide' where WRIA, WAU or HUC boundaries don't exist) and NAIP orthophoto imagery (to get a feel for what a questionable boundary area actually looks like today). Ceded Land treaty areas are based on treaty language and US Government decrees dated 1854-1892. Natural geographic barriers such as streams and ridge lines were used where described or eluded to in treaty descriptions. Coordinate based latitude/longitude boundary lines were used in some Central Washington areas where described. References to general compass directions were followed using natural barriers such as watershed boundaries or drainages wherever possible. Some treaty boundary descriptions were found to be inadequate, inaccurate and in some cases misleading in nature in describing what should have been a natural boundary or even a coordinate based solution to a property description. Some of these boundary areas open to interpretation are discussed below in the Supplemental Information based on the language and definite boundaries of other treaty areas. Ceded areas in Oregon and Idaho from the Camp Stevens Treaties have been included in this dataset. The Washington State Department of Ecology makes no warranty for the accuracy of this material and is not libel for its use. Ecology will maintain this data layer for its own use and distribute to all interested parties. Updates, corrections and documentation should be submitted to the contact person. This data may or may not reflect the most current tribal reservation areas. Tribal reservations are updated regularly in the Major Public Lands (MPL) layer maintained by Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This GIS data is draft information and a work in progress and should be used only as a generalized visual guide to 150 year old treaties of limited content.93 years ago
- This dataset describes Tribal Lands in Washington State. Included are areas where the tribes ceded title to their historic areas of use to the U.S. Government through various treaties enacted during the later half of the 19th century. Boundary lines have been digitized from a variety of digital data sources including 1:100,000 streams for boundaries described in treaties as following a stream or river, 1:24k Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA), Watershed Administrative Unit (WAU) and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) boundaries for boundaries referred to in treaties as 'divide', 'summit' or 'between the waters of', 1:100,000 Major Public Lands (for current reservation areas), 10 meter DEM and 7.5 minute USGS digital Quad maps (to define ridgelines and 'divide' where WRIA, WAU or HUC boundaries don't exist) and NAIP orthophoto imagery (to get a feel for what a questionable boundary area actually looks like today). Ceded Land treaty areas are based on treaty language and US Government decrees dated 1854-1892. Natural geographic barriers such as streams and ridge lines were used where described or eluded to in treaty descriptions. Coordinate based latitude/longitude boundary lines were used in some Central Washington areas where described. References to general compass directions were followed using natural barriers such as watershed boundaries or drainages wherever possible. Some treaty boundary descriptions were found to be inadequate, inaccurate and in some cases misleading in nature in describing what should have been a natural boundary or even a coordinate based solution to a property description. Some of these boundary areas open to interpretation are discussed below in the Supplemental Information based on the language and definite boundaries of other treaty areas. Ceded areas in Oregon and Idaho from the Camp Stevens Treaties have been included in this dataset. The Washington State Department of Ecology makes no warranty for the accuracy of this material and is not libel for its use. Ecology will maintain this data layer for its own use and distribute to all interested parties. Updates, corrections and documentation should be submitted to the contact person. This data may or may not reflect the most current tribal reservation areas. Tribal reservations are updated regularly in the Major Public Lands (MPL) layer maintained by Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This GIS data is draft information and a work in progress and should be used only as a generalized visual guide to 150 year old treaties of limited content.93 years ago
- This dataset describes Tribal Lands in Washington State. Included are areas where the tribes ceded title to their historic areas of use to the U.S. Government through various treaties enacted during the later half of the 19th century. Boundary lines have been digitized from a variety of digital data sources including 1:100,000 streams for boundaries described in treaties as following a stream or river, 1:24k Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA), Watershed Administrative Unit (WAU) and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) boundaries for boundaries referred to in treaties as 'divide', 'summit' or 'between the waters of', 1:100,000 Major Public Lands (for current reservation areas), 10 meter DEM and 7.5 minute USGS digital Quad maps (to define ridgelines and 'divide' where WRIA, WAU or HUC boundaries don't exist) and NAIP orthophoto imagery (to get a feel for what a questionable boundary area actually looks like today). Ceded Land treaty areas are based on treaty language and US Government decrees dated 1854-1892. Natural geographic barriers such as streams and ridge lines were used where described or eluded to in treaty descriptions. Coordinate based latitude/longitude boundary lines were used in some Central Washington areas where described. References to general compass directions were followed using natural barriers such as watershed boundaries or drainages wherever possible. Some treaty boundary descriptions were found to be inadequate, inaccurate and in some cases misleading in nature in describing what should have been a natural boundary or even a coordinate based solution to a property description. Some of these boundary areas open to interpretation are discussed below in the Supplemental Information based on the language and definite boundaries of other treaty areas. Ceded areas in Oregon and Idaho from the Camp Stevens Treaties have been included in this dataset. The Washington State Department of Ecology makes no warranty for the accuracy of this material and is not libel for its use. Ecology will maintain this data layer for its own use and distribute to all interested parties. Updates, corrections and documentation should be submitted to the contact person. This data may or may not reflect the most current tribal reservation areas. Tribal reservations are updated regularly in the Major Public Lands (MPL) layer maintained by Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This GIS data is draft information and a work in progress and should be used only as a generalized visual guide to 150 year old treaties of limited content.93 years ago
- This dataset describes Tribal Lands in Washington State. Included are areas where the tribes ceded title to their historic areas of use to the U.S. Government through various treaties enacted during the later half of the 19th century. Boundary lines have been digitized from a variety of digital data sources including 1:100,000 streams for boundaries described in treaties as following a stream or river, 1:24k Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA), Watershed Administrative Unit (WAU) and Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) boundaries for boundaries referred to in treaties as 'divide', 'summit' or 'between the waters of', 1:100,000 Major Public Lands (for current reservation areas), 10 meter DEM and 7.5 minute USGS digital Quad maps (to define ridgelines and 'divide' where WRIA, WAU or HUC boundaries don't exist) and NAIP orthophoto imagery (to get a feel for what a questionable boundary area actually looks like today). Ceded Land treaty areas are based on treaty language and US Government decrees dated 1854-1892. Natural geographic barriers such as streams and ridge lines were used where described or eluded to in treaty descriptions. Coordinate based latitude/longitude boundary lines were used in some Central Washington areas where described. References to general compass directions were followed using natural barriers such as watershed boundaries or drainages wherever possible. Some treaty boundary descriptions were found to be inadequate, inaccurate and in some cases misleading in nature in describing what should have been a natural boundary or even a coordinate based solution to a property description. Some of these boundary areas open to interpretation are discussed below in the Supplemental Information based on the language and definite boundaries of other treaty areas. Ceded areas in Oregon and Idaho from the Camp Stevens Treaties have been included in this dataset. The Washington State Department of Ecology makes no warranty for the accuracy of this material and is not libel for its use. Ecology will maintain this data layer for its own use and distribute to all interested parties. Updates, corrections and documentation should be submitted to the contact person. This data may or may not reflect the most current tribal reservation areas. Tribal reservations are updated regularly in the Major Public Lands (MPL) layer maintained by Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This GIS data is draft information and a work in progress and should be used only as a generalized visual guide to 150 year old treaties of limited content.93 years ago
- Tacoma-Pierce County Nonattainment Area (a.k.a. Wapato Hills-Puyallup River Valley PM2.5 Nonattainment Area)63 years ago
- The Washington State Parcels Project provides a statewide data set of tax parcels attributes that cover those counties that currently have digital tax parcels. Attribute data has been normalized so that the field names are the same across all counties. The data set contains the tax parcel identification number, situs addresses, the Department of Revenue land use codes, improvement and land values, and a link to the county's assessor's website for parcel information (if it exists).63 years ago
- The Shoreline Public Access Project is a geographic information systems (GIS) project to identify the location, length, and degree of public access to Washington State's marine shoreline. Before the project, it was unknown how much of Washington's 3068 miles of shoreline was public. The information was scattered throughout various government agencies and the data quality was variable. Through the Shoreline Public Access Project, the best available information has been summarized into a single data set, used to answer questions about our shoreline's ownership and public accessibility.The purpose of the Shoreline Public Access Project is: 1) to combine various sources of shoreline data into an organized and comprehensive database 2) to create a more accurate dataset of publicly accessible shoreline. The ultimate purpose of this data is to give shoreline managers and planners another tool to assist them in making important shoreline decisions.For more information, contact Christina Kellum, Washington State Department of Ecology GIS Manager, gis@ecy.wa.gov.13 years ago
- The locations show the approximate location of shoreline oblique photo points along the inner and outer Washington Coast, the Columbia and Snake Rivers, and large freshwater lakes. The points represent the location of the airplane as recorded by an onboard GPS unit at the time the photographs were taken during the summer months of 2006.For more information, contact Christina Kellum, Washington State Department of Ecology GIS Manager, gis@ecy.wa.gov.13 years ago
- This web map contains datasets representing the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) of Washington State, labels for NHD features, and the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) basins for Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) levels 4, 8, and 12. The NHD dataset has been adopted as the Washington State hydrography standard. The NHD is a national framework for assigning reach addresses to water-related entities, such as industrial discharges, drinking water supplies, fish habitat areas, wild and scenic rivers. Reach addresses establish the locations of these entities relative to one another within the NHD surface water drainage network, much like addresses on streets. Once linked to the NHD by their reach addresses, the upstream/downstream relationships of these water-related entities--and any associated information about them--can be analyzed using software tools ranging from spreadsheets to geographic information systems (GIS). GIS can also be used to combine NHD-based network analysis with other data layers, such as soils, land use and population, to help understand and display their respective effects upon one another. Furthermore, because the NHD provides a nationally consistent framework for addressing and analysis, water-related information linked to reach addresses by one organization (national, state, local) can be shared with other organizations and easily integrated into many different types of applications to the benefit of all.This high-resolution NHD, generally developed at 1:24,000/1:4,800 scale. Local resolution NHD is being developed where partners and data exist. The NHD contains reach codes for networked features, flow direction, names, and centerline representations for areal water bodies. The NHD also incorporates the National Spatial Data Infrastructure framework criteria established by the Federal Geographic Data Committee.This map contains a BETA version of WaterType attached to the Skagit River Basin NHDflowlines. This Beta version of the Watertype is the result of a pilot project and will be refined over the next six months. The field is for users of NHD who want access to Water Type and who are not under Forest Practices rules. The WaterType uses Shorelines Master Program type S streams and Fish Presence Data from both WA Dept Natural Resources and WA Dept Fish and Wildlife.13 years ago
- Polygons depict time of travel estimates for active public drinking water supplies. Source location data were obtained from the Washington State Department of Health, Office of Drinking Water. Data is updated Monday mornings. Check the "Data updated:" date in the Details section. Metadata dates are not automatically updated.63 years ago
- This application displays the cities or towns with Certified Public Accountants.13 years ago
- This data compiled by the Washington Military Department on August 22, 2019. The All Hazards Alert Broadcasting System (AHAB) data points supply visual depiction of where the siren locations are along the Washington State Coast and some inland waterways. If an actual tsunami event occurs the sirens supply not only audible but visual warnings of the impending danger via a wailing audio sound and an intense blue light for the hearing impaired, which can also cut through fog and is visible from a long distance. The sirens further supply a 4500-watt public address system to relay verbal information to the local populations or play digitally pre-recorded messages. The siren design enables a 360-degree coverage. Has the capability to make test and actual evacuation announcements in English and Spanish (These are pre-recorded on each siren’s installed micro SD card.) Using pre-programmed phrases and words, messages can be created at any control point for such things as ‘Shelter in Place’, and Hazardous Material Notification. Siren positional data is derived from the satellite transponder attached to each siren which derives its location from current GPS satellites deployed by the United States. Attribute Description RTU - Siren reference number Address - Nearest address of where the siren is located Name - Name of the siren LocationReference - Description of where the siren is located in relation to address City - City where the siren is location County - County where siren is located Elevation - Elevation in feet AMSL of the siren location Latitude - Latitude of siren location Longitude - Longitude of siren location Updated: 8/22/201913 years ago
- Ecology created the GIS statewide river mile point layer in March 2007 by digitizing the river mile points depicted on the USGS 7½ minute (24k) topographic quadrangle maps. Some of the rivers have gaps in the river mile progression because several of the quadrangle maps do not have any river mile points, while a few were missing a point or two. In November 2014 Ecology added river mile points for the missing areas using Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) 1975 Stream Catalog, which only covers WRIA's 1 through 24. The Stream Catalog shows river miles for nearly every stream; however, only those water courses that have river miles from the USGS quadrangle maps were added. The field SOURCE denotes the source of the data point, USGS or WDFW. Discrepancies between the USGS and WDFW are documented in the Supplemental Information section.63 years ago
- 3 years ago
- 3 years ago
- This data was compiled by the Washington Military Department on June 27, 2019. The Limited English Proficiency (LEP) information is summarized at the county level as well as at the census track/ county subdivision layer level. County level data was derived from the 2016 Office of Financial Management (OFM) study which provided an estimate of population with limited English proficiency at the state and county levels. The census tract data are derived from the 2015 census update and indicates language spoken at home and ability to speak English for those over five years old. All data displayed indicate a population of at least 1,000 or 5% of the population.LEPCountyv2 = Limited English Proficiency County version 2 – from OFM census dataLEPCSDv2 = Limited English Proficiency County Subdivision version 2 – data drawn from US Census 2010 LEPtractsv2 = Limited English Proficiency Census Tracts version 2 – data drawn from US Census 2010Attribute DescriptionCounty - County nameLanguage - Limited English Proficiency Language(s) spoken for the corresponding polygon - each Language is followed by a number to indicate a sequence number for each data fieldSym - Symbology field used to symbolize the polygons - holds the total count of LEP languages spoken for that polygonAFFGEOID - American Fact Finder Geospatial ID used to link tabular data to the polygons - consists of the -- Census block identifier; a concatenation of 2010 Census state FIPS code, 2010 Census county FIPS code, 2010 Census tract code, and 2010 Census block numberName - County Subdivision name from American Fact Finder (AFF) dataLanguage - Limited English Proficiency Language(s) spoken for the corresponding polygon - each Language is followed by a number to indicate a sequence number for each data fieldSym - Symbology field used to symbolize the polygons - holds the total count of LEP languages spoken for that polygonNAMELSAD10 2010 Census translated legal/statistical area description and the block group numberAFFGEOID - American Fact Finder Geospatial ID used to link tabular data to the polygons - consists of the -- Census block identifier; a concatenation of 2010 Census state FIPS code, 2010 Census county FIPS code, 2010 Census tract code, and 2010 Census block numberDisplay Label - Geographic name for each polygon from AFFSym - Symbology field used to symbolize the polygons - holds the total count of LEP languages spoken for that polygonLanguage - Limited English Proficiency Language(s) spoken for the corresponding polygon - each Language is followed by a number to indicate a sequence number for each data field23 years ago
Title
Updated